How Exelon Pays
Exelon's represented-hourly base, E01 to E09 professional and vice-president grades and the SVP, EVP and CEO tiers, priced across 12 United States utility markets alongside 67 percent performance shares, 33 percent RSUs, a discounted ESPP, a $15.60M CEO package at 103:1 and 74 FY2025 H-1B filings.
Band Hierarchy
Exelon publishes no grade catalogue, no salary structure and no promotion matrix, but it does something more useful than most issuers: it prints base ranges, bonus targets and, from senior manager upward, an annual long-term incentive value directly in its job advertisements. The E01 through E09 codes below are Exelon's own, evidenced by current advertisements that name E03, E04 and E05 reporting relationships and identify a vice president as E09. E07 and E08 remain unresolved rather than invented, and the represented population runs on bargained wage steps outside the grade structure entirely.
Represented ladder — bargained craft, field and clerical
Professional ladder — E01 through E04
Management ladder — E05 through E06
Executive ladder — E07 through CEO
Disclosed executive layer
Track divergence
Hierarchy qualifications and legacy structures
- E01 through E09 are Exelon's own grade codes, not research nomenclature. A current director of enterprise transformation advertisement names E03, E04 and E05 direct reports, and a separate advertisement identifies a vice president of talent as E09. What is missing is the salary structure attached to those codes, not the codes themselves.
- E07 and E08 are the honest gap. No public source names a title at either grade, so the row shown here is a straight interpolation between the E06 advertisements and the disclosed vice-president package and should be read as a planning envelope only.
- Represented employees are not on this ladder at all. About 42 percent of the workforce is covered by a collective bargaining agreement whose wage schedules, overtime rules and retirement terms are set locally, and no current bargained wage table appears in any Exelon filing.
- Pre-2022 Exelon included Constellation's generation and competitive-energy business. Historical grade references survive only where current advertisements demonstrate continuity, and no claim is made that a former generation grade maps to a current utility grade.
- Exelon Corporation itself employs almost nobody. Staff are employed by Exelon Business Services Company, PHI Service Company and the six operating utilities, which is why visa sponsorship, savings-plan provisions and bargaining coverage all vary by legal entity rather than by grade.
- Long-term incentive eligibility, not bonus eligibility, is the meaningful boundary. Every grade participates in the annual incentive, but no routine employer equity grant was observed below E05 in any sampled advertisement, and the vehicle behind the advertised $25,000 and $50,000 values is never named.
Peer-level mapping
| Band | Archetype | Peer mapping | Caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| REP | Represented craft, field and clerical | Journeyman craft and field classifications at any investor-owned utility, priced on a bargained hourly scale rather than a salary grade | Roughly 42 percent of Exelon employees sit here and their pay is set by local collective agreements, so a single national midpoint hides real spread between IBEW locals, utilities and job classifications.A current Building Electrician B advertisement in Rockville at $41.95 an hour with a 4 percent bonus, widened to a $45,000 to $100,000 envelope because bargained rates, overtime, shift premium and call-out vary by local agreement. |
| E01 | Entry professional, analyst or engineer I | Analyst I, Engineer I or Associate at a comparable regulated utility | Role family and represented status can override the grade entirely; a craft apprentice hired the same week may out-earn an E01 professional on overtime alone.Blended from two current 7 percent advertisements, an executive facilities administrator in Chicago at $60,800 to $83,600 and an Illinois paralegal at $66,400 to $91,300. |
| E02 | Professional or engineer II | Analyst II, Engineer II or Professional at a comparable regulated utility | This is the widest bonus band on the ladder, running 10 to 15 percent between the Chicago engineer and Maryland general engineer advertisements, so the target is genuinely role-specific rather than grade-wide.A current Chicago engineer advertisement at $84,800 to $116,600 with a 10 percent bonus and a Maryland general engineer advertisement at $92,000 to $126,500 with 15 percent. |
| E03 | Senior professional or first-line supervisor | Senior Analyst, Senior Engineer or Supervisor at a comparable regulated utility | Both the individual-contributor and the first-line management route sit at E03, so the grade does not tell you whether the job carries direct reports.A national senior engineer advertisement at $103,200 to $141,900 and a Maywood senior business program manager advertisement at $88,800 to $122,100, both at a 15 percent target. |
| E04 | Principal or manager | Principal, Lead or Manager at a comparable regulated utility | E04 is the highest grade at which no routine long-term incentive appeared in any sampled advertisement, so a principal engineer and a first-time manager are both all-cash on target.A Kennett Square principal engineer advertisement at $122,400 to $168,300 and a Baltimore external affairs manager advertisement at $118,400 to $162,800, both at a 20 percent target. |
| E05 | Senior manager or key functional leader | Senior Manager or key functional leader at a comparable regulated utility | This is the first grade where a routine annual long-term incentive appears in advertisements, so the E04 to E05 step is worth more than the base increase suggests.Three current advertisements at a 25 percent target and a stated $25,000 annual long-term incentive: audit services in Baltimore at $139,200 to $191,400, corporate physical security in Chicago at $150,400 to $206,800 and an assistant general counsel in Washington at $190,400 to $261,800. |
| E06 | Director or senior functional leader | Director or Associate General Counsel at a comparable regulated utility | Specialist legal and technical roles are priced at E06 without a conventional director span, so the grade reflects market value as much as organisational scope.Two current advertisements at a 30 percent target and a stated $50,000 annual long-term incentive: a director of external affairs at $176,000 to $242,000 and an associate general counsel for FERC in Baltimore at $212,800 to $292,600. |
| E07-8 | Executive director or senior utility leader | Executive director or senior utility function leader, one step below an officer appointment | This is the weakest row on the page. It is an interpolation between director advertisements and disclosed vice-president packages, and no Exelon source names an E07 or E08 title.Interpolated between the E06 advertisement evidence and the 8-K vice-president and senior vice-president packages; no direct observation exists at this grade. |
| E09 | Vice President | Vice President at a comparable regulated utility | The disclosed anchor is the low end of the range. Caroline Fulginiti's vice-president and controller package, effective 5 October 2026, is $325,000 of base with a 40 percent target and $226,000 of long-term incentive, well below the modelled midpoint.Anchored on the 25 August 2026 Form 8-K vice-president and controller package and widened upward to a $325,000 to $500,000 base envelope for larger vice-president roles. |
| SVP | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President or utility business-unit officer | Utility senior vice presidents are paid on the operating company, not the parent. Andrew Plenge's ComEd senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer package, effective 1 January 2027, is $375,000 of base with a 50 percent target and $372,000 of long-term incentive.Anchored on the 25 August 2026 Form 8-K ComEd senior vice president package and interpolated upward toward the disclosed executive vice-president targets. |
| EVP | Executive Vice President and named executive officer | Named executive officer at a comparable regulated utility | These are 2025 target values from the proxy, not city-scaled pay. The four non-chief-executive named officers ran from a $2.65 million target for David Glockner to a $4.24 million target for Michael Innocenzo.Midpoints of the 2025 proxy target direct compensation table for the four non-chief-executive named executive officers; base runs $680,000 to $755,000 and long-term incentive $1.42 million to $2.75 million. |
| CEO | President and Chief Executive Officer | Utility holding-company chief executive | A single national package, never a city-scaled figure. The target shown is $14.40 million; the 2025 Summary Compensation Table outcome was $15,601,905 once actual incentive, pension change and other compensation are included.Calvin Butler's 2025 target direct compensation from the 2026 proxy: a $1.40 million salary rate, a 150 percent annual incentive target and a $10.90 million long-term incentive target. |
Critical evidence warning
Exelon publishes no salary structure, no range minimums or midpoints and no promotion matrix for any grade. The E01 through E06 rows are midpoints of ranges that Exelon itself advertised, which makes them unusually well evidenced for a company of this kind, but a midpoint is still a computation rather than a disclosed band. The E07 to E08, E09 and senior vice-president rows are interpolations anchored on two or three disclosed appointment packages. The represented row is a deliberately wide envelope because bargained rates, overtime and shift differentials vary by local agreement. Use the ladder for orientation and never as a quotation of an Exelon pay band.
Compensation by Band — Chicago
Low / median / high annual values at 1.00× base and 1.00× total-compensation factors versus Chicago. Total equals base plus bonus plus annualized equity.
| Band | Title | Base | Variable | Total TC | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REP | Represented craft, field and clerical Entry through journeyman; apprenticeship and collective-agreement dependent · modeled | $62K – $83K | 2% | $74K $63K – $85K | — |
| E01 | Entry professional, analyst or engineer I 0 to 2 years · verified | $65K – $87K | 7% | $81K $69K – $94K | — |
| E02 | Professional or engineer II 2 to 5 years · verified | $90K – $122K | 12.5% | $119K $101K – $137K | — |
| E03 | Senior professional or first-line supervisor 5 to 8 years · verified | $98K – $133K | 15% | $133K $113K – $152K | — |
| E04 | Principal or manager 7 to 12 years · verified | $117K – $158K | 20% | $165K $141K – $190K | — |
| E05 | Senior manager or key functional leader 10 to 15 years · verified | $147K – $199K | 25% | $241K $205K – $277K | $25K |
| E06 | Director or senior functional leader 12 to 18 years · verified | $180K – $244K | 30% | $326K $277K – $375K | $50K |
| E07-8 | Executive director or senior utility leader 15 to 22 years · modeled | $266K – $359K | 42.5% | $706K $600K – $812K | $261K |
| E09 | Vice President 18 to 25 years · modeled | $351K – $474K | 55% | $1.25M $1.06M – $1.44M | $613K |
| SVP | Senior Vice President 20+ years · modeled | $393K – $532K | 65% | $1.65M $1.40M – $1.90M | $886K |
| EVP | Executive Vice President and named executive officer 20+ years · verified | $610K – $825K | 90% | $3.45M $2.93M – $3.97M | $2.08M |
| CEO | President and Chief Executive Officer 25+ years · verified | $1.19M – $1.61M | 150% | $14.40M $12.24M – $16.56M | $10.90M |
Total Compensation Range by Band
Total compensation in Chicago across the employee bands. Proxy-disclosed executive cohorts are excluded so the employee bands stay readable.
Global Footprint & Pay Arbitrage
Exelon is a domestic United States regulated transmission-and-distribution group. It serves almost 11 million customers through ComEd, PECO, BGE, Pepco, Delmarva Power and Atlantic City Electric, and every one of its 20,571 employees works in the United States. No material Exelon employee office was verified in India, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Singapore, continental Europe or the Middle East, so this report models twelve American markets and manufactures no international bands. Chicago is the anchor and every other city is calibrated against the Chicago median.
Office and market catalogue — calibration factors versus Chicago
| Location | Likely office profile | Presence | Base | TC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago United States · USD | Corporate headquarters, the Exelon Business Services hub and the ComEd home market, and the source of most of the job-advertisement evidence in this ladder | Corporate headquarters; multiple current job advertisements | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Oakbrook Terrace United States · USD | The largest ComEd and business-services campus outside the Chicago Loop, and the densest technology-role market in the visa record with nine labour condition applications | Major ComEd and shared-services location | 0.98× | 0.98× |
Maywood United States · USD | ComEd operations market in Chicago's western suburbs, evidenced by a current senior business program manager advertisement at $88,800 to $122,100 | ComEd operations; current job advertisement | 0.98× | 0.98× |
Baltimore United States · USD | Baltimore Gas & Electric headquarters market and a major shared-services centre, carrying the audit, legal and technology advertisements that anchor the E05 and E06 rows | BGE headquarters; multiple current job advertisements | 0.98× | 0.98× |
Philadelphia United States · USD | PECO headquarters market, and the one utility whose craft and clerical population carries a materially better 401(k) fixed match than the rest of the group | PECO headquarters; labour condition application record | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Washington United States · USD | The highest-priced market in the model, covering Pepco, federal regulatory and policy roles and the assistant general counsel advertisement at $190,400 to $261,800 | Pepco, regulatory and policy roles; current job advertisement | 1.06× | 1.06× |
Rockville United States · USD | Pepco and PHI service-area location, and the source of the represented Building Electrician B advertisement at $41.95 an hour with a 4 percent bonus | Pepco/PHI operations; current represented advertisement | 1.03× | 1.03× |
Bethesda United States · USD | PHI Service Company technology market, evidenced by senior systems engineer labour condition applications rather than by a published headcount | PHI/BSC technology roles; visa wage records | 1.05× | 1.05× |
Newark United States · USD | Delmarva Power and shared-services market in Delaware, and the lowest-priced market in the model alongside Carneys Point | Delmarva Power/BSC; visa wage record | 0.96× | 0.96× |
Wilmington United States · USD | Delaware utility and regulatory market for Delmarva Power and PHI, serving the 945-employee Delmarva registrant | Delmarva Power/PHI service territory | 0.97× | 0.97× |
Mays Landing United States · USD | Atlantic City Electric operations hub for the smallest Exelon registrant at 630 employees, dominated by field and represented roles | Atlantic City Electric service territory | 0.97× | 0.97× |
Carneys Point United States · USD | Atlantic City Electric and shared-services technology location whose four senior software engineer visa records price above the Chicago technology median despite the lowest city index | ACE/BSC technology roles; visa wage records | 0.96× | 0.96× |
Exelon does not publish employee headcount by city, so this catalogue makes no claim about which market is largest after Chicago. Presence is evidenced by a headquarters, a utility service territory, a current job advertisement or a labour condition application worksite. The bundle's brief asked for a Newark, New Jersey location; Exelon's material Newark hub is in Delaware, and the table reflects the company rather than the brief.
Chicago anchor medians — the basis of every modeled cell
| Band | Base | Stock | Bonus | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E01 | $76K | $0 | $5K | $81K |
| E02 | $106K | $0 | $13K | $119K |
| E03 | $115K | $0 | $17K | $133K |
| E04 | $138K | $0 | $28K | $165K |
| E05 | $173K | $25K | $43K | $241K |
| E06 | $212K | $50K | $64K | $326K |
| EVP | $718K | $2.08M | $646K | $3.45M |
| CEO | $1.40M | $10.90M | $2.10M | $14.40M |
- Chicago is the anchor at 1.00. It is the corporate headquarters, the largest Exelon Business Services hub and the ComEd home market, and it carries more of the advertisement evidence in this ladder than any other city.
- The whole spread is about ten percentage points. Washington at 1.06 is the top of the model and Newark, Delaware and Carneys Point at 0.96 the bottom, so which state an Exelon offer comes from matters far less than which grade it is.
- City factors are flat across the ladder. A domestic regulated utility shows no evidence of the level-dependent geographic compression that offshore delivery models produce, so no separate top-of-ladder factor is applied anywhere.
- Base and total factors are identical in every market because the underlying calibration is a base-pay index and the incentive targets are grade-wide rather than city-specific. Nothing in the sources supports a different total-compensation geography.
- The executive vice-president and chief-executive rows are national proxy disclosures. They are not local pay ranges and should not be read as city-scaled figures in any selected market.
- Exelon publishes headcount by registrant, never by city: ComEd 6,688, PHI 4,422, BGE 3,383 and PECO 3,169, leaving roughly 2,900 at Exelon Business Services. A registrant total is not a city total and must not be presented as one.
Model rules
- Every modelled cell is the Chicago median multiplied by the city index. There is no foreign-exchange step because every Exelon salary evidenced in this report is denominated in United States dollars.
- A total compensation cell is base plus target annual incentive plus target annual long-term incentive. It excludes sign-on payments, relocation, severance, one-time retention awards, overtime and shift premium.
- No employer benefit load is added anywhere. The 401(k) fixed match, the variable match and the automatic contribution are employer cost, not pay, and total compensation is rebuilt from the components so that base plus bonus plus equity reconciles to the total on every row.
- Long-term incentive is entered as zero below E05 because that is what the sampled advertisements show, not because the field was left blank. A zero here is a finding.
- City indices are an analytical normalisation layer built for this report. They are not disclosed Exelon salary zones and should never be quoted as such; Exelon states only that actual salary depends on skills, qualifications, experience and other factors.
- Represented pay is carried as a single wide envelope rather than a bargained scale, because no current collective-agreement wage table was located in public sources.
Variable Pay & Annual Cash Incentive
Exelon states in its 2025 Form 10-K that all employees participate in an annual incentive programme, and it prints the target percentage in its job advertisements, which is why the staircase below is unusually well evidenced. What it never publishes is the non-executive formula: no business-unit weighting, no individual multiplier, no threshold or maximum schedule and no payout date. For executives the opposite is true, and the 2025 scorecard is disclosed metric by metric.
| Band | Target | Mechanism | Recent payout |
|---|---|---|---|
REP Represented craft, field and clerical | 0 to 4 percent of base | Annual incentive where the collective agreement provides for it; a current represented electrician advertisement states 4 percent. Overtime, shift premium and call-out pay are separate and are not an incentive target. | Not publicly disclosed |
E01 Entry professional | 7 percent of base | Annual incentive; two separate current advertisements at this grade both state a flat 7 percent target and neither states a long-term incentive. | Not publicly disclosed |
E02 Professional or engineer II | 10 to 15 percent of base | Annual incentive; the Chicago engineer advertisement states 10 percent and the Maryland general engineer advertisement 15 percent, so the target is role-specific inside the grade. | Not publicly disclosed |
E03 Senior professional or supervisor | 15 percent of base | Annual incentive; both sampled senior advertisements state 15 percent, and neither the senior engineer nor the senior program manager requisition carries a long-term incentive. | Not publicly disclosed |
E04 Principal or manager | 20 percent of base | Annual incentive; the principal engineer and external affairs manager advertisements both state 20 percent, which makes E04 the highest all-cash grade observed. | Not publicly disclosed |
E05 Senior manager | 25 percent of base plus $25,000 of long-term incentive | Annual incentive plus the first routinely observed equity value. Three separate advertisements state 25 percent and $25,000, across audit, physical security and legal. | Not publicly disclosed |
E06 Director | 30 percent of base plus $50,000 of long-term incentive | Annual incentive plus a doubled equity value. Both sampled director-level advertisements state 30 percent and $50,000. | Not publicly disclosed |
E07-8 Executive director or senior utility leader | 35 to 50 percent of base | Annual incentive; no advertisement or filing evidences this grade, so the target is interpolated between the director evidence and the disclosed vice-president package. | Not publicly disclosed |
E09 Vice President | 40 to 70 percent of base | Annual incentive. The only disclosed point is the vice president and controller appointment at a 40 percent target; larger vice-president roles are modelled above it. | Not publicly disclosed |
SVP Senior Vice President | 50 to 80 percent of base | Annual incentive. The disclosed point is the ComEd senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer appointment at a 50 percent target. | Not publicly disclosed |
EVP Executive Vice President | 80 to 100 percent of base | Base salary multiplied by the target percentage multiplied by the corporate performance factor, with committee negative discretion and a 0 to 200 percent range. Honorable and Glockner sit at 80 percent, Jones and Innocenzo at 100 percent. | The 2025 factor was 133.62 percent. Innocenzo took five points of negative discretion; the other three paid between 134.4 and 135.9 percent of a target computed on salary actually paid. |
CEO President and Chief Executive Officer | 150 percent of base | The same formula as the executive vice presidents on a 150 percent target, making the annual incentive worth $2.10 million at a $1.40 million salary rate. | $2,665,719 paid for 2025, about 128.9 percent of a target computed on salary actually paid, after five points of negative committee discretion. |
Executive incentive targets — percent of salary
Named-executive outcomes
| Executive | Target | Paid | Attainment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calvin G. Butler Jr. | $2,068,500 | $2,665,719 | 128.9% after five points of negative discretion |
| Jeanne M. Jones | $749,060 | $1,008,831 | 134.7% of a target computed on salary actually paid |
| Michael Innocenzo | $735,375 | $948,234 | 128.9% after five points of negative discretion |
| Colette D. Honorable | $534,700 | $726,893 | 135.9% of a target computed on salary actually paid |
| David Glockner | $545,382 | $732,772 | 134.4% of a target computed on salary actually paid |
Employee payout timing and history
Exelon states that all employees participate in an annual incentive programme aligning individual and business results, and its advertisements disclose the target percentage for the advertised role. Everything between those two facts is undisclosed: there is no published business-unit weighting, no individual performance multiplier, no threshold or maximum schedule for non-executives, and no payout date. Targets are also not guaranteed to be grade-wide, as the 10 and 15 percent split inside E02 shows. Eligibility itself varies by grade, classification, represented status and service.
Sales and special incentives
A regulated transmission-and-distribution utility has no commissioned sales force, and no sales incentive plan, project utilisation bonus, deal-closure payment or offshore allowance was found anywhere in Exelon's public material. The variable cash that matters outside the incentive plan is field cash: overtime, shift premium, call-out and storm-restoration hours in the represented population, which is real money and is not an incentive target.
Equity — RSUs, PSUs, Options & ESPP
Equity at Exelon is narrow, not broad. All employees participate in the annual incentive, but no routine employer grant appears in any sampled advertisement below the senior-manager grade, where a $25,000 annual long-term incentive shows up, doubling to $50,000 at director. Above that the disclosed executive design is 67 percent performance shares and 33 percent restricted stock units. The broad-based stock channels are the employee stock purchase plan and the Exelon Stock Fund inside the 401(k), neither of which is a compensatory grant.
- The 2020 plan authorised 21.9 million new shares and carried forward 7,095,559 shares that remained available under the prior plan at 1 March 2020, plus recycled shares from forfeited or withheld awards.
- No current remaining pool, burn rate or fully diluted utilisation percentage was located in any reviewed filing, and none is estimated here. A utilisation figure quoted anywhere for Exelon should be treated as unsourced until the current plan-status disclosure is checked.
- Exelon states that no stock options are outstanding and that none were exercised in 2025, so the entire equity programme runs on full-value awards.
- Share-equivalent counts anywhere on this page divide a target grant value by the $44.38 reference price observed on 26 August 2026. They are an illustration of scale, not a forecast of the number of units a grant will actually contain.
2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan reserve
Vesting — common reported employee schedule
Executive vesting is annual and predictable, which is why the same date recurs in the insider record: the 2 February 2026 cycle settled 198,151 units for the chief executive and granted 200,262 derivative awards on the same day, and the 3 February 2025 cycle settled 104,323. Because settlement and grant land together, a Form 4 filed in early February will almost always show a settlement, an award and a tax withholding at once, and the withholding is a code F transaction rather than a discretionary sale.
Eligibility by hierarchy level
- No routine employer equity grant was observed at any grade below E05 in any sampled advertisement. Discretionary awards below that grade may exist but were not evidenced, and the absence is recorded as a zero rather than as a gap.
- The advertised $25,000 and $50,000 annual values are role-specific commitments printed in a job advertisement. They are not proof of a grade-wide equity table, and the vehicle behind them is never named.
- The 2020 plan makes officers and employees of Exelon and its subsidiaries eligible, along with non-employee directors, so eligibility is a plan-level permission rather than an entitlement at any grade.
- The employee stock purchase plan and the Exelon Stock Fund are the only stock channels evidenced as open to the broad workforce, and eligibility for both can depend on plan terms and collective-agreement provisions for represented employees.
- Performance shares are described as a senior-executive instrument. Nothing in the sources supports a performance-share grant below the officer layer.
Indicative annual grant value by band — Chicago
| Band | Annual value (USD) | Median | Shares at $44.38 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E05 | $19K – $31K | $25K | ~422–704 |
| E06 | $38K – $63K | $50K | ~845–1,408 |
| E07-8 | $196K – $326K | $261K | ~4,411–7,351 |
| E09 | $460K – $766K | $613K | ~10,359–17,266 |
| SVP | $665K – $1.11M | $886K | ~14,973–24,955 |
| EVP | $1.56M – $2.61M | $2.08M | ~35,235–58,726 |
| CEO | $8.18M – $13.63M | $10.90M | ~184,205–307,008 |
Annualized planning value (±25%), not the face value of every new-hire grant. Share equivalents use the $44.38 reference price at 26 August 2026, 14:35 UTC market-data capture and ignore plan valuation rules and PSU performance. Highlighted rows are disclosed grant-date stock awards.
Named executive target equity
| Executive | Target | Units / structure |
|---|---|---|
Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | $10,900,000 | 67 percent performance shares and 33 percent restricted stock units; about 75.7 percent of the target package and roughly 245,600 share equivalents at $44.38. |
Michael Innocenzo Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | $2,750,000 | 67/33 performance shares and restricted stock units; the largest non-chief-executive target in the 2025 table. |
Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | $2,500,000 | 67/33 performance shares and restricted stock units, alongside a $755,000 salary rate and a 100 percent annual incentive target. |
Colette D. Honorable Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | $1,700,000 | 67/33 performance shares and restricted stock units, on an 80 percent annual incentive target. |
David Glockner Former Executive Vice President, Compliance, Audit and Risk | $1,420,000 | 67/33 performance shares and restricted stock units; the smallest named-executive target in the 2025 table. |
Robert Kleczynski Incoming Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | $1,765,000 | 67 percent performance shares and 33 percent restricted stock units from the 2027 grant, roughly 39,770 share equivalents at $44.38. |
Andrew Plenge ComEd Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | $372,000 | A senior utility executive package effective 1 January 2027, roughly 8,382 share equivalents at $44.38. |
Caroline Fulginiti Vice President and Controller | $226,000 | The lowest disclosed officer long-term incentive target at Exelon, roughly 5,092 share equivalents at $44.38. The vehicle mix is not separately stated. |
Executive Compensation
Exelon discloses executive pay twice over, once as a target package and once as a Summary Compensation Table outcome, and the two differ by more than a million dollars for the chief executive. The target view is the useful one for understanding design: 9.7 percent salary, 14.6 percent annual incentive and 75.7 percent long-term incentive. The reported view adds the actual incentive result, the grant-date accounting value of stock and a change in pension value that no other named officer except the chief operating officer carries at any scale.
Reading the package
On a target basis Calvin Butler's package is 9.7 percent salary, 14.6 percent annual incentive and 75.7 percent long-term incentive, so about 90 percent of target pay depends on performance. The reported 2025 outcome of $15,601,905 exceeded the $14.40 million target mainly because the annual incentive paid at roughly 129 percent even after five points of negative discretion, and because a $400,595 change in pension value and $256,567 of other compensation sit in the reported figure but not in the target. The $10,900,024 stock line is a grant-date accounting value, not cash received.
Exelon's chief executive is paid less than three of the four utility comparators and its ratio is the lowest of the group, but the comparison is fragile in both directions. American Electric Power's $36.6 million reflects sign-on and transition awards for a newly appointed chief executive, and Duke Energy's figure covers a partial year on a transition. Constellation, the business Exelon separated in February 2022, pays its chief executive more than Exelon does on a workforce with a much lower median, which is exactly what a competitive generation business looks like next to a regulated wires business. Regional and utility-president compensation is not separately disclosed by any of these issuers unless the person becomes a named executive officer or appears in an appointment filing.
Named Executive Officers & Board
Exelon's officer bench is mid-transition. Three appointment packages were disclosed on 25 August 2026, the chief financial officer role changes hands on 5 October 2026, and the chief operating officer is expected to leave in 2027 on a date still to be determined.
The other compensation column shown here combines the proxy's all other compensation with the change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings, so that salary plus incentive plus stock plus other reconciles exactly to the disclosed Summary Compensation Table total on every row. For the chief executive that is $256,567 of other compensation plus a $400,595 pension change. Colette Honorable and David Glockner carry no pension change at all, which is the clearest sign that Exelon's cash-balance pension is a legacy population rather than a universal officer benefit. Named executive salaries are reviewed each January and February and changes take effect on 1 March; 2025 increases ranged from 3 to 10 percent with the chief executive at 7.6 percent, which is why salary actually paid differs from the salary rate used to compute the target.
Board compensation framework
| Element | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Annual equity retainer for 2026 | $175,000 | Restricted stock units vesting at the next annual meeting, replacing the quarterly deferred stock units used for 2025 grants. |
| Annual equity retainer for 2025 | $165,000 | Paid to six of the nine directors listed for a full year of service; Anthony DeWalt received $133,833 and John Young $54,396 for partial service. |
| Board chair cash retainer for 2026 | $200,000 | Increased from $180,000. The chair, Paul Bowers, took $274,327 of cash in 2025. |
| Highest 2025 director total | $439,327 | Paul Bowers as chair, being $274,327 of cash and $165,000 of equity with no other compensation. |
| Typical 2025 non-chair total | $290,000 to $351,000 | Five directors sat in this range on cash retainers of $125,000 to $171,000 plus the $165,000 equity award. |
| Charitable matching item | $15,000 | Marjorie Rodgers Cheshire, Linda Jojo and Charisse Lillie each show a $15,000 other-compensation item for 2025. |
| One-off charitable contribution | $500,000 | Recorded against John Young, taking his 2025 total to $661,539 despite the smallest equity award on the board. |
Director pay is a governance package rather than an employment band and it is excluded from the pay ladder. The structural change worth noting is the 2026 shift from quarterly deferred stock units to a single annual restricted stock unit award vesting at the next annual meeting, alongside a $10,000 increase in the equity retainer and a $20,000 increase in the chair's cash retainer.
Regional heads and other officers
Below the five named officers, Exelon discloses nothing on a recurring basis. The only public window is a Form 8-K appointment, and the 25 August 2026 filing opened it wider than usual: Robert Kleczynski becomes Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on 5 October 2026 at $650,000 of base, a 90 percent annual incentive target and a $1.765 million long-term incentive target; Caroline Fulginiti becomes Vice President and Controller the same day at $325,000, 40 percent and $226,000; and Andrew Plenge becomes ComEd Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on 1 January 2027 at $375,000, 50 percent and $372,000. Jeanne Jones moves to Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategy, and Michael Innocenzo is expected to depart his Exelon, PECO and ComEd roles during 2027. Those three packages are the only evidence anywhere for what a vice president or a utility senior vice president is paid at Exelon.
Insider Trades — SEC Forms 3/4/5
Exelon is a Nasdaq-listed United States issuer, so Forms 3, 4, 5, 13D and 13G are the correct record and Indian promoter or SEBI takeover concepts do not apply. Almost every large transaction below is a compensation event rather than a market view: the annual cycle settles and grants on the same early-February date, and the share counts that follow are statutory tax withholding under Form 4 transaction code F.
| Date | Person | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-02 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Settlement Units and shares converted on the annual cycle date. Reported at a zero conversion price; this is equity compensation settling, not a purchase. | 198,151 | — | $0 |
| 2026-02-02 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Award New derivative awards granted on the same day the prior cycle settled, consistent with the $10.90 million annual long-term incentive target. | 200,262 | — | $0 |
| 2026-02-02 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Withholding Form 4 transaction code F. Shares surrendered to cover tax on the settlement, not a discretionary sale. | 82,268 | $43.91 | $3.61M |
| 2026-02-02 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Sale The genuine disposition in the 2026 cycle, and about a quarter of the size of the tax withholding on the same day. | 31,793 | $43.91 | $1.40M |
| 2026-02-02 | Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Award Restricted stock units granted on the annual cycle date, the 33 percent time-vested portion of her long-term incentive. | 18,789 | — | $0 |
| 2026-02-02 | Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Award Performance shares granted the same day, the 67 percent at-risk portion settling on the 2026 to 2028 scorecard. | 24,701 | — | $0 |
| 2026-02-02 | Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Withholding Tax settlement on the vesting portion of the same cycle. | 16,051 | $43.91 | $705K |
| 2026-02-02 | Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Sale Reported disposition following the settlement and withholding. | 7,154 | $43.91 | $314K |
| 2025-02-03 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Settlement The 2025 cycle settlement, about half the 2026 share count, reflecting a smaller prior-cycle grant and a lower vest-date price. | 104,323 | — | $0 |
| 2025-02-03 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Withholding Form 4 transaction code F at the 2025 vest-date price of $40.57. | 40,978 | $40.57 | $1.66M |
| 2025-02-03 | Calvin G. Butler Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | Sale The 2025 discretionary disposition, less than half the 2026 equivalent. | 11,996 | $40.57 | $487K |
| 2025-02-03 | Jeanne M. Jones Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Settlement Share count from the 2026 proxy vesting table. The proxy dollar value is computed on vest-date prices and is not restated here. | 19,197 | — | $0 |
| 2025-02-03 | Michael Innocenzo Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | Settlement Share count from the 2026 proxy vesting table for the 2025 cycle. | 20,986 | — | $0 |
| 2025-02-03 | David Glockner Former Executive Vice President, Compliance, Audit and Risk | Settlement The largest non-chief-executive 2025 vesting, larger than either sitting executive vice president despite the smallest grant target. | 31,171 | — | $0 |
| 2025-02-03 | Colette D. Honorable Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | Settlement A small settlement consistent with a short tenure of accumulated grants at the officer layer. | 3,734 | — | $0 |
| 2025-04-30 | Colette D. Honorable Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | Withholding An amended Form 4/A corrected this transaction from code S to code F, which is the clearest single illustration of why raw Exelon insider feeds overstate selling. | 1,463 | $40.57 | $59K |
Reading guide
Benefits & Perks
Exelon's benefit disclosure is lopsided in a useful way. The health, leave and education categories are confirmed only by category on the careers page, with no carrier, no premium share, no leave weeks and no paid-time-off day count anywhere. Retirement, by contrast, is quantified in detail in the Employee Savings Plan Form 11-K, and that filing is where the real structure shows: the match is not uniform across the group. The split below follows the operating utilities rather than geography, because at Exelon the employing entity, not the state, is what changes the terms.
Illinois — ComEd and Exelon corporate
- Population — ComEd employs 6,688 people, the largest Exelon registrant. Chicago also carries the corporate headquarters and most of the roughly 2,900-person Exelon Business Services population that is not attributed to any utility registrant. [official]
- Retirement — Standard non-represented fixed match of 60 percent on the first 5 percent. Capped at 3 percent of eligible pay, plus a performance-based variable match of up to a further 3 percent generally credited after year end. A 5 percent contributor can therefore attract up to 6 percent. [official]
- Retirement — Automatic 4 percent contribution for qualifying newer employees. Available to qualifying newer non-pension, non-represented, non-craft employees regardless of whether they defer anything, and stacked on top of the match rather than replacing it. [official]
- Bargaining — Represented ComEd employees follow their local agreement. Match, profit-sharing and fixed-contribution provisions vary by collective agreement, and no current bargained schedule appears in any Exelon filing. [npd]
- Pension — Cash-balance pension for eligible legacy populations. Coverage depends on hire date and employing entity and is not universal. The clearest evidence that it is a legacy population is that two of the five named executive officers report no change in pension value at all. [official]
Global programs
- Health — Medical, dental and vision cover. Confirmed as categories on the careers page and in job advertisements. Carrier, employer premium share, deductible, coverage tiers and actuarial value are not disclosed anywhere. [official]
- Income protection — Life and disability insurance. Confirmed as a category. The salary multiple, elimination period and benefit percentage are not published. [official]
- Retirement — 401(k) contributions of 1 to 50 percent of eligible pay. Pre-tax, Roth and after-tax contributions are permitted subject to Internal Revenue Service and plan limits, so the plan supports mega-backdoor style after-tax saving in principle. [official]
- Retirement — Potential employer commitment of up to 10 percent of pay. For a qualifying newer non-pension, non-represented, non-craft employee contributing 5 percent: 3 percent fixed match, up to 3 percent variable match and a 4 percent automatic contribution. That is a materially better retirement package than the headline match suggests. [official]
- Time off — Vacation, sick, floating and fixed holidays. Confirmed as categories. The number of days at any service length is not centrally published, and represented schedules are set by collective agreement. [npd]
- Family — Maternity, bonding, primary caregiver and parental leave. Confirmed as categories on the careers page. The number of paid weeks for any of them is not disclosed in any reviewed source. [npd]
- Family — Adoption and surrogacy assistance. Confirmed as a benefit. The financial limit is not published. [npd]
- Education — Tuition reimbursement. Confirmed as a benefit. The annual cap, eligible programmes and any service-repayment clause are not published. [npd]
- Wellbeing — Employee assistance programme, emotional-health support and fitness reimbursement. Confirmed as categories. Vendors and reimbursement limits are not published. [npd]
- Health access — Health-care travel support where covered care is unavailable locally. Confirmed on the careers benefits page and dependent on plan terms. Notable for a utility whose service territories span dense urban and rural areas. [official]
- Referral — Employee referral bonus. Referenced in job advertisements. Role eligibility and the amount are not centrally published. [official]
- Work model — Hybrid working described role by role. Advertisements frequently describe hybrid arrangements, but no universal enterprise policy on office days was found, and field and represented roles are shift-bound. [npd]
- Development — Leadership development, technical training, mentoring and annual development plans. Described in the 2025 Form 10-K human-capital disclosure. Learning platforms, certification budgets, sabbaticals and relocation schedules are not disclosed. [official]
Benefit fields not publicly quantified
The gap between what Exelon confirms and what it quantifies is unusually wide on benefits. Every health, leave, education and wellbeing item above is confirmed as a category and unquantified as a value, which means a candidate cannot compare an Exelon offer on paid parental weeks, holiday entitlement or tuition cap without asking. The one part of the package that is genuinely quantified is retirement, and it is quantified in a Form 11-K rather than on a careers page. Statutory leave entitlements in Illinois, the District of Columbia, Delaware and New Jersey apply to Exelon employees as they do to any employer in those jurisdictions, but they are government rules and are not presented here as Exelon benefits.
Performance Review & Pay Progression
Exelon discloses the executive review calendar, the executive scorecard and the equity vesting conditions, and discloses almost nothing about how an ordinary employee is rated or how a rating becomes money. It says ratings are linked to compensation outcomes and that market benchmarking informs pay, and then stops. The progression figures below are an interface model, not company policy.
Not publicly disclosed
Modeled promotion planning timeline
| Band | Years to next scope | Promotion hike | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| REP | Bargained wage steps and apprenticeship milestones rather than grade promotion; no corporate time-in-grade applies | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E01 | About 2 years to E02 | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E02 | About 3 more years, roughly 5 in total, to E03 | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E03 | About 2 to 4 years to E04 | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E04 | About 3 to 5 years to E05 | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E05 | About 2 to 4 years to E06 | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E06 | Highly selective; no standard time in grade exists between director and the executive layer | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E07-8 | Not disclosed; movement into the officer layer is an appointment rather than a promotion | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| E09 | Board and committee appointment; no time-in-grade norm applies | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| SVP | Board and committee appointment; no time-in-grade norm applies | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| EVP | Board and committee succession decision | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| CEO | Board and committee succession decision | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
The strongest evidenced progression facts at Exelon are the incentive target and the long-term incentive threshold, not the timing. Moving from E04 to E05 raises the bonus target from 20 to 25 percent and, more importantly, adds a $25,000 annual long-term incentive that did not exist at any lower grade; moving from E05 to E06 raises the target to 30 percent and doubles the long-term incentive to $50,000. Those two steps are worth far more than the base increase alone. Timing is inferred from the experience requirements printed in the advertisements themselves: 0 to 2 years at E01, 2 to 5 at E02, 5 to 8 at E03, 7 to 12 at E04, 10 to 15 at E05 and 12 to 18 at E06. Represented progression runs on apprenticeship milestones and bargained wage steps instead, and the current wage tables are not public.
Pay progression evidence
Modelled progression, not Exelon policy: E01 to E02 takes about two years for a modelled 8 to 15 percent increase; E02 to E03 about three further years, roughly five in total, for 8 to 15 percent; E03 to E04 two to four years for 10 to 18 percent; E04 to E05 three to five years for 12 to 20 percent and the first routinely observed equity; E05 to E06 two to four years for 12 to 20 percent and a doubled long-term incentive. Above E06 there is no norm at all, because the move into the officer layer is an appointment priced against the market rather than a promotion against a matrix. Every percentage in this paragraph is an implementation assumption; Exelon publishes no promotion increase for any grade.
H-1B / LCA Visa Footprint — United States
Exelon sponsors H-1B workers, but the parent name is not a complete search. Filings appear under Exelon Business Services Company LLC, Commonwealth Edison, Baltimore Gas & Electric, PECO Energy and PHI Service Company, because Exelon Corporation itself employs almost nobody. Across all five entities FY2025 produced 74 certified labour condition applications against 20,571 employees, so this is a real but marginal channel concentrated in technology, engineering, architecture, data and project roles. Labour condition applications are offered base salaries covering new hires, extensions, amendments and transfers alike, and they are not unique-hire counts.
Dataset summary
| Dataset | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| H1BData, Exelon Business Services FY2025 | 32 records, median $124,738 | The most granular title-and-city dataset available. Quartiles are not published and 88 percent of records sit between $100,000 and $150,000. |
| MyVisaJobs, Exelon Business Services FY2025 | 41 applications, average offered salary $145,097 | A larger record set than H1BData over a different window, and averages computed on range midpoints rather than medians. The two centre measures differ for that reason. |
| MyVisaJobs, Exelon Business Services FY2024 | 28 certified plus 2 withdrawn, average $143,319 | The withdrawal count matters: withdrawn applications appear in some third-party totals and not others. |
| MyVisaJobs, Exelon Business Services FY2023 | 28 certified, average $136,099 | Average offered base salary has risen about 6.6 percent over two years on a flat application count. |
| H1BGrader, cited window | Median $128,000, average $130,707 | A third centre measure on a different window again. It is quoted here only to show the spread between sources, not used in the city table. |
| Entity split, FY2026 through 18 August 2026 | Exelon Business Services 21, ComEd 12, PECO 10, BGE 8 | PECO's FY2026 count is already more than triple its FY2025 total of 3, the largest proportional shift among the entities. |
City-level H-1B wage history
| City | P25 | Median | P75 | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Oakbrook Terrace, IL The densest technology market in the record and the only city with a defensible spread. Manager IT, principal IT architect and senior manager IT titles. | $107K | $130,707 | $149K | 9 |
Baltimore, MD Senior software engineer and senior architect roles at the BGE and shared-services campus. | $125K | $124,738 | $136K | 7 |
Carneys Point, NJ Senior software engineer I and II roles. The median prices above the city index would suggest, which points to national rather than local pricing for shared-services technology. | $132K | $131,602 | $135K | 4 |
Chicago, IL Senior architect, senior data scientist and support analyst. A small sample for the headquarters city, which reflects where technology work actually sits. | $107K | $111,446 | $116K | 3 |
Bethesda, MD Senior systems engineer roles at PHI Service Company. Two records only. | $123K | $122,699 | $123K | 2 |
Washington, DC A single principal quantitative engineer record at $154,024, the highest individual wage in the FY2025 extract. | $154K | $154,024 | $154K | 1 |
Philadelphia, PA A single senior engineer record. No percentile can be computed from one observation. | $107K | $106,808 | $107K | 1 |
Newark, DE A single senior systems engineer record at the Delmarva shared-services site. | $110K | $109,845 | $110K | 1 |
All-years aggregates. P25/P75 are rounded reconstruction values marked modeled; medians and record counts are the stronger fields.
Selected title / worksite records
| Title | Worksite | Proffered wage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager IT | Oakbrook Terrace, IL | $168,200 | The highest management-track wage in the FY2025 record and consistent with the E05 senior-manager envelope. |
| Principal Quantitative Engineer | Washington, DC | $154,024 | The highest individual wage in the extract, at the E04 to E05 boundary in the highest-index market. |
| Principal IT Architect | Oakbrook Terrace, IL | $148,949 | An E04 to E05 technical role, above the modelled E04 Chicago base of $137,800. |
| Manager, IT | Oakbrook Terrace, IL | $137,758 | Almost exactly the modelled E04 anchor base, which is the closest single corroboration of the ladder in the visa data. |
| Senior Architect | Baltimore, MD | $135,782 | An E04 technical role in a market indexed at 0.98 times Chicago. |
| Senior Software Engineer II | Carneys Point, NJ | $135,408 | Above the Baltimore and Chicago equivalents despite the lowest city index in the model. |
| Senior Software Engineer | Baltimore, MD | $124,738 | The exact Exelon Business Services FY2025 median, sitting at the E03 to E04 boundary. |
| Senior Systems Engineer | Bethesda, MD | $122,699 | An E03 to E04 role at PHI Service Company. |
| Senior Data Scientist | Chicago, IL | $116,334 | Comfortably inside the E03 advertised range of $88,800 to $141,900 at the anchor city. |
| Senior Systems Engineer | Newark, DE | $109,845 | An E03 role in the lowest-indexed market in the model. |
| Senior Engineer | Philadelphia, PA | $106,808 | Below the modelled E03 Chicago median of $115,300 despite an index of 1.00, which is a reminder that a single record is not a market. |
| Senior Architect | Chicago, IL | $106,558 | The lowest architect wage in the record and the 25th percentile marker for both Chicago and Oakbrook Terrace. |
Reading the data correctly
- These are offered base salaries. They exclude the annual incentive, any long-term incentive, overtime and every benefit, so an E05 record at $168,200 carries a further 25 percent target bonus and $25,000 of long-term incentive that the visa filing never shows.
- A labour condition application is not a hire. It can cover an extension, an amendment or a transfer, and one worker can generate several across a career, so the 74 FY2025 applications overstate new sponsorship.
- Searching the parent name alone misses most of the record. Five separate legal entities file, and Exelon Business Services Company LLC is the largest of them by a wide margin.
- City percentiles are not statistically defensible where only one or two records exist. Washington, Philadelphia, Newark and Bethesda are shown with their record counts precisely so the reader can discount them.
- The FY2025 centre measures differ by source because the record sets and the statistics differ: $124,738 is a median across 32 H1BData records, $145,097 is an average across 41 MyVisaJobs records, and $128,000 is a median on a third window. None of them is wrong; they are answering different questions.
- Sponsorship is concentrated in technology, engineering, architecture, data and project roles. Nothing in the record suggests H-1B use in the represented craft and field population, which is where 42 percent of Exelon employees work.
Key Nuances & Insights
Exelon publishes no salary structure, yet its advertisements print a base range, a bonus target and, from senior manager upward, an annual long-term incentive value. Fourteen current advertisements were enough to reconstruct a coherent E01 to E06 ladder with the incentive staircase attached. Very few large employers leak their grade economics this cleanly, and it means an Exelon candidate can calibrate an offer against the company's own published numbers rather than against an aggregator.
No routine employer long-term incentive appeared in any sampled advertisement below E05. A principal engineer at $137,800 and a first-time manager at the same grade are both all-cash on target. The step to E05 adds $25,000 of annual long-term incentive on top of moving the bonus target from 20 to 25 percent, and E06 doubles it to $50,000. Framed as a percentage of target direct compensation, the E04 to E05 move is worth about 46 percent, far more than the base increase alone implies.
Exelon's 103 to 1 ratio is the lowest of the four utility peers checked, but that is mostly a workforce-mix fact rather than a restraint fact. The $150,905 median is above every peer, including Xcel at $147,664, Duke at $132,604 and Constellation at $122,610, because roughly 42 percent of Exelon employees are represented craft and field workers whose overtime, shift premium and storm-restoration hours land in the pay-ratio calculation. Identical executive pay at a company with a leaner represented workforce would produce a visibly worse ratio.
The Employee Savings Plan Form 11-K records a materially different fixed match for PECO craft and clerical employees: 100 percent of the first 5 percent contributed, against 60 percent of the first 5 percent for most non-represented employees elsewhere in the group. That is a two-percentage-point-of-pay difference driven entirely by which Exelon subsidiary employs you and in what classification, and it is invisible on any careers page.
For a qualifying newer non-pension, non-represented, non-craft employee contributing 5 percent, the arithmetic runs 3 percent fixed match, up to 3 percent performance-based variable match and a 4 percent automatic contribution paid whether or not the employee defers anything. That is a genuinely strong package for a utility and it is documented in a Form 11-K rather than in recruitment material, so most candidates never see it.
About 42 percent of employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Their pay progression, overtime rules, shift differentials and retirement terms are set by local agreements whose current wage tables appear in no Exelon filing. A represented Building Electrician B advertisement showed $41.95 an hour with a 4 percent bonus, which annualises to roughly $87,000 before any overtime, but that is one classification in one local and cannot be generalised.
Staff are employed by Exelon Business Services Company, PHI Service Company and the six operating utilities. That is why visa sponsorship, savings-plan provisions and bargaining coverage all vary by legal entity, why a search for H-1B filings under the parent name misses most of the record, and why an offer letter may name a company the candidate has never heard of. Registrant headcounts are ComEd 6,688, PHI 4,422, BGE 3,383 and PECO 3,169, leaving roughly 2,900 in the shared-services population.
The 2025 annual incentive weighted adjusted operating earnings per share at 60 percent, SAIDI at 15 percent, SAIFI at 15 percent and customer service at 10 percent. Earnings beat target at $2.77 against $2.69 and still the overall factor came in at 133.62 percent rather than near the maximum, because customer service at 7.46 fell below its 7.55 threshold and scored zero. At Exelon a strong financial year does not by itself produce a strong bonus.
The compensation committee applied five points of negative discretion to the chief executive and chief operating officer in 2025, taking their attainment to roughly 128.9 percent while the other named officers paid between 134 and 136 percent. Many issuers describe a discretion power they never exercise; Exelon's is live and it separated officers within the same certified scorecard year.
Exelon discloses nothing about vice-president or senior vice-president pay on a recurring basis, so the three packages in the 25 August 2026 Form 8-K carry the entire weight of the E09 and SVP rows. Two of the three are small: a vice president and controller at $325,000 of base with a 40 percent target and $226,000 of long-term incentive, and a ComEd senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer at $375,000, 50 percent and $372,000. Both sit at or below the bottom of the modelled envelope, which is a warning that the midpoints shown here are optimistic for smaller officer roles.
Exelon completed the separation of Constellation on 2 February 2022, taking generation and competitive energy out of the group. Pre-2022 grade references, pay ratios and peer comparisons do not map cleanly onto the current regulated wires business, and the separated business is now the most expensive comparator on the peer table: Constellation's chief executive was paid $17.115 million against Exelon's $15.602 million, on a median employee of $122,610 against $150,905.
The entire modelled spread runs from Newark, Delaware and Carneys Point at 0.96 to Washington at 1.06, about ten percentage points end to end, and Exelon publishes no geographic differential at all. Public ranges overlap heavily across Chicago, Baltimore and Philadelphia. Grade, job family and represented status move an Exelon package far more than which of six states it is written in, and the Carneys Point technology wages, which price above the local index, suggest shared-services roles are benchmarked nationally anyway.
For everyone below senior manager the employee stock purchase plan is the only equity there is, and it is the plan Exelon says least about. The 2026 proxy confirms the plan, the payroll deductions, the quarterly purchase dates and the existence of a discount, but does not restate the discount percentage, the contribution ceiling, any lookback or the annual purchase limit. Historic terms are deliberately not carried forward here, so a candidate weighing an Exelon offer on its purchase-plan value has to ask.
Average turnover across 2023 to 2025 was 5.93 percent, of which 2.39 points were retirement, 2.58 voluntary and 0.96 non-voluntary. Retirement is almost as large as voluntary attrition, which is a demographic signature specific to an ageing utility craft workforce. It also explains why succession planning and apprenticeship pipelines appear in the human-capital disclosure ahead of any retention-pay discussion.
Research control
Against the four utility comparators in the source register, Exelon is a middle-of-the-pack payer at the top and an above-median payer at the median. Its chief executive total of $15.602 million sits below Constellation at $17.115 million and American Electric Power at $36.602 million, roughly level with Xcel at about $15.999 million and above Duke at $13.653 million reported. Its 103 to 1 ratio is the lowest of the group. On employee pay the comparison inverts: the $150,905 median is the highest of the five companies, which is what a workforce that is 42 percent represented does to a median. The right conclusion is not that Exelon pays professionals better than its peers, for which there is no evidence, but that its workforce mix is more heavily weighted to well-paid unionised field roles than theirs.
Evidence classification
| Label | Meaning | Examples and permitted use |
|---|---|---|
| Verified | An Exelon or SEC filing, the Employee Savings Plan Form 11-K, the official careers benefits page, a government rule, or a current Exelon-family job advertisement that states the figure itself. | Quote directly. This covers every executive figure, the retirement match structure, the incentive targets and the advertised base ranges and long-term incentive values. |
| Reported | A labour condition application wage record, an employee-submitted salary record, or a third-party aggregator observation from Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, PayScale or Indeed. | Use as corroboration and never as the primary anchor. The visa records are base only and the aggregator figures carry unknown sample composition. |
| Modeled | The Chicago anchor multiplied by a city index, or an interpolation between two disclosed points such as the E07 to E08 row and the upper end of the vice-president and senior vice-president envelopes. | Treat as a planning envelope. These figures are transparent and replaceable and are not Exelon policy in any form. |
| Not publicly disclosed | No public source supports the figure. Recorded as an explicit gap rather than filled with a plausible number. | Ask in the process. Paid leave weeks, holiday days, the tuition cap, insurance coverage amounts, the rating scale and the merit matrix all sit here. |
Explicit “Not publicly disclosed” index
Known gaps and diligence before relying on a cell
- 1The two chief executive figures on this page differ deliberately. The CEO band row carries the $14.40 million target direct compensation from the 2026 proxy so that it is comparable with the other bands, which are also target values, while the executive section carries the $15,601,905 Summary Compensation Table total. Neither is wrong and neither should be quoted as the other.
- 2The executive vice-president and chief-executive rows are national proxy disclosures, not city-scaled pay. The ladder view applies a city index uniformly, so those two rows should be read as national values wherever the city selector sits. They are marked as excluded from the range chart for the same reason.
- 3Because every location factor is flat across the ladder, no top-of-ladder factor is set anywhere and the executive rows cannot distort the interpolation for junior bands. This is a domestic single-country report and no geographic compression pattern exists in the sources.
- 4The other compensation column in the executive table combines the proxy's all other compensation with the change in pension value so that the components reconcile exactly to the disclosed total. The two elements are shown separately in the chief-executive breakdown.
- 5Two named-executive totals reconcile a dollar short on the disclosed component figures, which is a rounding artefact in the source. The other compensation figure carries the residual dollar so that each row sums to the disclosed Summary Compensation Table total.
- 6No employer benefit load is included anywhere in total compensation. Several research bundles in this corpus add a notional 8 to 15 percent benefit value to produce a total reward figure; that is employer cost, not pay, and total compensation here is rebuilt from base, bonus and equity so that it reconciles.
- 7The represented population is carried as one wide band rather than as a bargained scale, and is excluded from the location factor logic in spirit even though the table applies the index uniformly. Represented pay moves with local agreements and overtime, not with a corporate city index.
- 8The FY2025 visa city records total 28 while the Exelon Business Services record count for the year is 32. The difference is records without a resolved worksite in the extract, and no attempt is made to allocate them.
- 9Two centre measures for FY2025 visa wages differ across sources, $124,738 as a median of 32 records and $145,097 as an average of 41. Both are shown rather than reconciled, because the record sets and statistics genuinely differ.
- 10FY2025 revenue of about $24.3 billion appears only in the bundle's structured data file rather than in the narrative report, so it is carried as an approximate figure. Adjusted operating earnings per share of $2.77 and 2026 guidance of $2.81 to $2.91 are directly evidenced.
- 11No non-United States Exelon employee population was verified anywhere. The research brief behind the bundle assumed offices in India, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Germany, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates; none exists, and this report models no international market rather than filling those rows with invented figures.
Source register — 30 sources
| S1 | About Exelon · Exelon Corporation · 2026-08-27. Current footprint, the six regulated utilities and almost 11 million customers. |
| S2 | Exelon completes separation of Constellation · Exelon Corporation newsroom · 2022-02-02. Entity history and the post-separation regulated-utility scope. |
| S3 | 2025 Form 10-K · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2026-02-12. Headcount of 20,571, registrant headcounts, 42 percent bargaining coverage, turnover, the all-employee annual incentive statement and revenue. |
| S4 | 2026 proxy statement · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2026-03-18. Executive target and actual compensation, the 2025 incentive scorecard, long-term incentive design, director pay and the 103 to 1 pay ratio. |
| S5 | 2020 proxy statement approving the 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2020-03-18. Plan authorisation of 21.9 million new shares, eligible participants and the 7,095,559 prior-plan shares carried forward. |
| S6 | Joint Form 8-K on leadership changes · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2026-08-25. The Kleczynski, Fulginiti and Plenge packages, the Jones role change and the planned Innocenzo departure. |
| S7 | Employee Savings Plan Form 11-K for 2025 · Exelon Business Services Company via SEC EDGAR · 2026-06-23. 401(k) contribution limits, the fixed and variable match, the automatic contribution and the PECO craft and clerical difference. |
| S8 | Careers benefits page · Exelon Corporation · 2026-08-27. Medical, dental, vision, retirement, paid time off, parental leave, tuition, adoption and health-care travel categories. |
| S9 | Job advertisement: Engineer, Chicago · Exelon via LinkedIn · 2026-08-27. Base $84,800 to $116,600 with a 10 percent annual bonus; the lower E02 anchor. |
| S10 | Job advertisement: Principal Engineer, Kennett Square · Exelon via LinkedIn · 2026-08-27. Base $122,400 to $168,300 with a 20 percent annual bonus and no long-term incentive; the E04 anchor. |
| S11 | Job advertisement: Senior Manager, Corporate Physical Security, Chicago · Exelon via LinkedIn · 2026-08-27. Base $150,400 to $206,800, a 25 percent bonus and a $25,000 long-term incentive; an E05 anchor. |
| S12 | Job advertisement: Director, External Affairs · Exelon via pac.org · 2026-08-27. Base $176,000 to $242,000, a 30 percent bonus and a $50,000 long-term incentive; the E06 anchor. |
| S13 | Job advertisement: Director, Enterprise Transformation Enablement · Exelon via LinkedIn · 2026-08-27. Names E03, E04 and E05 direct reports and identifies a vice president of talent as E09; the grade-code evidence. |
| S14 | Job advertisement: Building Electrician B, Rockville · Exelon via LinkedIn · 2026-08-27. Represented hourly rate of $41.95 with a 4 percent bonus and the represented benefits list. |
| S15 | Job advertisement: Senior Manager, Audit Services, Baltimore · Exelon via Monster · 2026-08-27. Base $139,200 to $191,400, a 25 percent bonus and a $25,000 long-term incentive; the lower E05 anchor. |
| S16 | Job advertisement: Associate General Counsel, FERC, Baltimore · Exelon via Legal.io · 2026-08-27. Base $212,800 to $292,600, a 30 percent bonus and a $50,000 long-term incentive; the specialist E06 anchor. |
| S17 | Form 4 history for Calvin Butler · SEC Form 4 index via secform4.com · 2026-08-27. The 2025 and 2026 annual cycle settlements, grants, code F withholdings and dispositions. |
| S18 | Form 4/A for Colette Honorable · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2025-04-30. The amendment correcting a code S sale to a code F tax withholding. |
| S19 | Exelon Business Services FY2025 labour condition applications · H1BData, from Department of Labor disclosure data · 2026-08-27. 32 wage records with titles and worksites, and the $124,738 median. |
| S20 | Exelon Business Services employer profile · MyVisaJobs · 2026-08-18. Application counts by entity and fiscal year, petition approvals and denials, and average offered salaries. |
| S21 | 2024 proxy statement · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2024-03-20. The 2023 incentive factor of 129.48 percent and post-separation long-term incentive treatment. |
| S22 | 2023 proxy statement · Exelon Corporation via SEC EDGAR · 2023-03-21. The 2022 incentive factor of 110.75 percent on the first post-separation scorecard. |
| S23 | SEC filings index · Exelon investor relations · 2026-08-27. Filing chronology, the 2024 incentive factor of 136.64 percent and access to the underlying documents. |
| S24 | USD to INR historical quote · Yahoo Finance · 2026-08-26. The foreign-exchange snapshot in the source bundle. No conversion is applied in this report because every figure is in United States dollars. |
| S25 | EXC historic price lookup · Exelon investor relations · 2026-08-26. The $44.38 reference share price used for every share-equivalent illustration. |
| S26 | Duke Energy 2026 proxy statement · Duke Energy via SEC EDGAR · 2026. Peer chief executive compensation of $13.653 million and a 106 to 1 ratio on a $132,604 median. |
| S27 | American Electric Power 2026 proxy statement · American Electric Power via SEC EDGAR · 2026. Peer chief executive compensation of $36.602 million and a 261 to 1 ratio on a $140,432 median. |
| S28 | Xcel Energy 2026 proxy statement · Xcel Energy via SEC EDGAR · 2026. Peer chief executive compensation of about $15.999 million and a 108 to 1 ratio on a $147,664 median. |
| S29 | Constellation Energy 2026 proxy statement · Constellation Energy via SEC EDGAR · 2026. Peer chief executive compensation of $17.115 million and a 140 to 1 ratio on a $122,610 median, for the business separated from Exelon in 2022. |
| S30 | Third-party salary records · Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, PayScale and Indeed · 2026-08-27. Corroboration only: a $112,000 software engineer median, a $169,933 data scientist median, a $94,000 company average base with $11,000 average bonus, a $148,000 to $203,000 Chicago senior engineer total pay range and a $108,804 senior engineer average salary. |
Recent News & Workforce Trend
Exelon's compensation news over the last four years is dominated by two things: the February 2022 separation of Constellation, which redefined what the company is, and an officer transition announced in August 2026 that changes the chief financial officer, the controller and the ComEd finance leadership within a single quarter. Nothing in the public record shows an enterprise-wide merit increase, pay freeze or salary cut for ordinary employees in 2025 or 2026.
Exelon reports headcount by SEC registrant rather than by city or function: ComEd 6,688, PHI 4,422 including Pepco 1,374, Delmarva Power 945 and Atlantic City Electric 630, BGE 3,383 and PECO 3,169. Those registrants account for 17,662 people, so roughly 2,900 sit in the Exelon Business Services and corporate population that employs most of the technology, finance, legal and audit roles priced on this page. A registrant total is not a city total. Average turnover across 2023 to 2025 was 5.93 percent, split as 2.39 percent retirement, 2.58 percent voluntary and 0.96 percent non-voluntary.
Generation and competitive energy left the group, leaving a United States regulated transmission-and-distribution holding company with six utilities. Pre-2022 grade references, pay ratios and peer comparisons do not map cleanly onto the current business, and Constellation is now one of the peer comparators on Exelon's own pay table.
Up from 20,014 a year earlier. The 2025 Form 10-K also gives the registrant split, the 5.93 percent average turnover across 2023 to 2025 and the statement that all employees participate in an annual incentive programme.
Adjusted operating earnings per share contributed 105.00 percent on a 60 percent weight, SAIDI 14.50 percent and SAIFI 14.12 percent on 15 percent weights each, and customer service scored zero after coming in at 7.46 against a 7.55 threshold. The chief executive and chief operating officer each absorbed five points of negative committee discretion.
Calvin Butler settled 198,151 units and received 200,262 new derivative awards, with 82,268 shares withheld at $43.91 for tax and 31,793 disposed. Jeanne Jones received 18,789 restricted stock units and 24,701 performance shares. This single date accounts for most of Exelon's annual insider-transaction volume.
Adjusted operating earnings per share of $2.77 against the $2.69 incentive target, with 2026 guidance of $2.81 to $2.91. The guidance range matters for compensation because the earnings measure carries 60 percent of the executive scorecard weight.
Calvin Butler's Summary Compensation Table total was $15,601,905 against a $150,905 median employee. The proxy also sets out the 2025 to 2027 performance-share design weighting adjusted earnings per share, operating return on equity, cash from operations to debt and relative total shareholder return at 25 percent each.
Named executive salaries are reviewed each January and February with changes effective 1 March. The 2025 round ranged from 3 to 10 percent, with the chief executive at 7.6 percent. No equivalent enterprise merit-effective date is published for the wider workforce.
The annual director equity award rises to $175,000 of restricted stock units vesting at the next annual meeting, replacing quarterly deferred stock units, and the board chair cash retainer rises from $180,000 to $200,000.
The filing sets out the 1 to 50 percent contribution range, the 60 percent fixed match on the first 5 percent, the performance-based variable match of up to 3 percent, the 4 percent automatic contribution for qualifying newer employees and the separate PECO craft and clerical provision of 100 percent of the first 5 percent.
Through 18 August 2026 the group had filed 21 applications at Exelon Business Services, 12 at ComEd, 10 at PECO and 8 at BGE. PECO's part-year count already more than triples its FY2025 total of three, the largest proportional shift among the sponsoring entities.
Robert Kleczynski becomes Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on 5 October 2026 at $650,000 of base, a 90 percent incentive target and $1.765 million of long-term incentive; Caroline Fulginiti becomes Vice President and Controller the same day at $325,000, 40 percent and $226,000; Andrew Plenge becomes ComEd Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on 1 January 2027 at $375,000, 50 percent and $372,000. Jeanne Jones moves to Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategy and Michael Innocenzo is expected to depart during 2027.
Fourteen live Exelon-family advertisements captured on the report date show 4 percent on a represented electrician role, 7 percent at entry professional, 10 and 15 percent inside the professional grade, 20 percent at principal and manager, 25 percent plus $25,000 of long-term incentive at senior manager and 30 percent plus $50,000 at director.