How Broadridge Pays
Broadridge's official W, B, T, S, P, K, M and E Global Career Framework bands and the R1 to R13 pay-observation spine, priced across 25 markets alongside stock options, RSUs and 0 to 150 percent performance RSUs, a $17.19M CEO package at 216:1, and a FY2026 H-1B median of $137,962.
Band Hierarchy
Broadridge is unusual in this series: the career architecture is official and public, and the pay attached to it is not. The 2026 U.S. Associate Guide describes a globally aligned Global Career Framework of roughly 20 functions, 90 job families, eight career bands and 39 coded levels plus the CEO. It publishes no title-to-code map, no experience expectation by code, no salary range, no incentive target and no employee grant table, so the R-spine below normalises public pay observations across tracks and must not be read as a Broadridge grade.
Individual contributor spine — R1 through R6 and specialist principal roles
Management spine — R7 through R11
Executive and board — named officers, chief executive and directors
Disclosed executive layer
Track divergence
Hierarchy qualifications and legacy structures
- The eight career bands and 39 coded levels are official and appear in Broadridge's own U.S. Associate Guide. Nothing else about them is public.
- No public source supports statements such as Software Engineer equals P2, Director equals M3 or Vice President equals E1. Any such claim is invented.
- The R1 to R13 spine in this report exists only because salary platforms and job postings expose titles rather than framework codes. It is a comparison device, not a reconstruction of Broadridge's grades.
- The guide's reference to legacy letter grades D through H is an Executive Retirement Savings Plan eligibility artifact as of 31 October 2024, not a current conversion table from the pre-2007 ADP structure.
- Peer mapping is limited to generic title equivalence. Fiserv, FIS and SS&C grade numbers are not comparable to anything Broadridge publishes.
- Broadridge does not disclose transfer rules, promotion gates, title equivalencies or the point at which a technical expert must move into management.
Peer-level mapping
| Band | Archetype | Peer mapping | Caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Analyst / Operations Associate | Entry analyst or junior engineer at Fiserv, FIS or SS&C | Generic title equivalence only. Broadridge publishes no crosswalk between its own career bands and any competitor grade, so a numeric peer mapping would be false precision.Base is the midpoint of a Broadridge Strategy Analyst posting at $85,000 to $95,000. The posting says bonus eligible without stating a target, and no routine equity grant is evidenced at this level, so the bonus is modeled at the low single-digit rate observed in the only published component split and equity is a real zero rather than a gap. |
| R2 | Associate Software Engineer | Associate or Engineer I at a comparable financial technology provider | Analytical stratum only. The R-spine normalises public pay observations across tracks and is not a Global Career Framework code.No United States posting or salary record sits between the Strategy Analyst midpoint and the Levels.fyi software engineer point, so this row is interpolated between them and marked modeled. The directly observed comparators are an India Member Technical total of ₹4.00 lakh to ₹7.00 lakh and a Canada Associate Software Engineer total of C$74,000 to C$89,000. |
| R3 | Software Engineer | Engineer II or established analyst at Fiserv, FIS or SS&C | Scope-based orientation only. Broadridge exposes no code for this population and salary platforms report titles rather than levels.The only fully split component observation for an ordinary Broadridge employee: a Levels.fyi United States software engineer point of about $100,000 base, $2,400 bonus and $2,200 stock, reported as roughly $105,000 total. Every modeled bonus and equity figure elsewhere in this ladder is scaled from this single record. |
| R4 | Senior Software Engineer | Senior Engineer or Senior Analyst at a comparable provider | Generic equivalence only; posting ranges are role and location specific rather than a published band.Base is the midpoint of a Broadridge Senior Software Engineer posting at $120,000 to $130,000, described as bonus eligible with no stated target. Bonus and equity are modeled from the R3 component split, since Broadridge publishes no short-term incentive target or long-term grant table for associates. |
| R5 | Lead Software Engineer / Technology Lead | Lead Engineer or first-line technical lead at a comparable provider | The lead stratum spans both expert individual contribution and first-line leadership; Broadridge publishes no rule for when a technical expert enters management.Base is the midpoint of a Broadridge Lead Software Engineer posting at $135,000 to $145,000. The India comparator is a Technology or Technical Lead total-pay envelope of ₹13.00 lakh to ₹22.00 lakh. Bonus and equity are modeled. |
| R6 | Senior Lead Software Engineer / Architect | Staff or Principal Engineer, or a specialist lead, at a comparable provider | Generic equivalence only. Function drives the range at this stratum more than seniority does.Base is the midpoint of a Broadridge Senior Lead Software Engineer posting at $145,000 to $155,000. Specialised cloud and platform postings in the same stratum run materially higher and are carried as the separate R6S row rather than folded into this median. |
| R6S | Principal Cloud / Platform Specialist | Principal or Distinguished specialist engineer at a comparable provider | A specialisation premium rather than a higher rung. Do not generalise this range to every senior individual contributor at the same stratum.Base is the midpoint of specialised Broadridge cloud and principal postings at $200,000 to $220,000, roughly forty percent above the generic senior lead midpoint at the same experience level. Bonus and equity are modeled. |
| R7 | Manager / Engineering Manager | Manager at Fiserv, FIS or SS&C | The posted range is drawn from engineering-management advertisements. Finance and operations managers at the same analytical stratum can be materially lower, which is the clearest example of function dominating level in this company.Base is the midpoint of a Broadridge Engineering Manager posting at $200,000 to $250,000. The Hong Kong comparator is a manager total of HK$921,000 to HK$988,000 and the United Kingdom comparator a project manager total of £59,000 to £110,000, both far below the United States anchor. Bonus and equity are modeled. |
| R9 | Director / Senior Director / AVP | Director or Senior Director at a comparable financial technology provider | The cross-function director envelope in the sources runs $125,000 to $227,293 with a $180,000 midpoint, and the senior director posting range runs $160,000 to $220,000. Those envelopes mix functions; this row uses the technology reading at the top of the evidence.Base is the FY2026 labour condition application offered wage of $227,293 for a Senior Director database role, the highest directly sourced director figure and the only one tied to a filing. Directors of software engineering in Canada post at C$150,000 to C$180,000 and an India Assistant Vice President is observed at ₹27.80 lakh to ₹38.00 lakh base. Bonus and equity are modeled. |
| R11 | Vice President | Vice President at Fiserv, FIS or SS&C | Broadridge does not map any title to an Executive E code, so a vice president here is a posting-derived stratum and not a disclosed executive level.Base is the upper-central point of a Broadridge Vice President posting envelope at $200,000 to $300,000, with VP Software Engineering observations near the top of that range. The India comparator is a vice-president base of ₹30 lakh to ₹56 lakh with reported additional pay of about ₹16.5 lakh. Bonus and equity at this level are modeled and are the least evidenced numbers in the ladder. |
| R12 | Named Executive Officer | Named executive officers at FIS, SS&C and Fiserv | This row carries the FY2025 Summary Compensation Table figures for Thomas P. Carey, the central of the four non-CEO named executives, whose totals span $2.11 million to $6.19 million. It is a single disclosed officer rather than a range for every executive-titled employee.FY2025 proxy row for Thomas P. Carey, President, Global Technology and Operations: $651,091 salary, $801,547 non-equity incentive, $898,472 stock awards plus $967,192 option awards, and $457,101 of other compensation. Stock and option figures are grant-date accounting values rather than cash received. |
| CEO | Chief Executive Officer | Chief executives of FIS, SS&C and Fiserv | A single worldwide figure. Peer ranking shifts sharply with sign-on awards, tenure and company size, and employee pay competitiveness cannot be inferred from it.FY2025 proxy row for Timothy C. Gokey: $1,076,667 salary, $1,552,705 non-equity incentive at about 96 percent of a 150 percent target, $6,459,215 stock awards plus $6,953,485 option awards, and $1,104,494 of pension and deferred change plus $42,092 of other compensation. |
| Board | Non-Employee Director | Large-cap United States financial technology boards | Retainer values rather than employment pay. Employee directors receive no incremental director compensation under the disclosed programme.FY2025 director programme: a $100,000 annual cash retainer and a $200,000 annual equity retainer delivered in deferred stock units and options, generally granted in November. The lead independent director receives a further $140,000 split $72,500 cash and $67,500 equity. |
Critical evidence warning
Every ordinary-employee figure in this report is an external observation. Broadridge publishes no salary range, no bonus target and no grant value for any of its 39 coded levels, so a posting midpoint, a crowdsourced point estimate or a visa filing wage is the strongest evidence available. India is the sharpest example of how unstable that is: Glassdoor puts a software engineer base central at ₹7.0 lakh while Levels.fyi reports a total point of ₹19.5 lakh, a gap far too wide to average away.
Compensation by Band — Lake Success, NY
Low / median / high annual values at 1.00× base and 1.00× total-compensation factors versus Lake Success, New York. Total equals base plus bonus plus annualized equity.
| Band | Title | Base | Variable | Total TC | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Analyst / Operations Associate 0–2 years · verified | $77K – $104K | 3% | $93K $79K – $107K | — |
| R2 | Associate Software Engineer 1–3 years · modeled | $81K – $109K | 3% | $98K $83K – $113K | — |
| R3 | Software Engineer 2–5 years · reported | $85K – $115K | 2% | $105K $89K – $120K | $2K |
| R4 | Senior Software Engineer 4–7 years · verified | $106K – $144K | 5% | $135K $115K – $156K | $4K |
| R5 | Lead Software Engineer / Technology Lead 6–10 years · verified | $119K – $161K | 8% | $158K $134K – $182K | $7K |
| R6 | Senior Lead Software Engineer / Architect 8–13 years · verified | $128K – $173K | 10% | $175K $149K – $201K | $10K |
| R6S | Principal Cloud / Platform Specialist 10–15 years · verified | $179K – $242K | 10% | $246K $209K – $283K | $15K |
| R7 | Manager / Engineering Manager 9–14 years · verified | $191K – $259K | 15% | $284K $241K – $326K | $25K |
| R9 | Director / Senior Director / AVP 14–22 years · verified | $193K – $261K | 20% | $318K $270K – $365K | $45K |
| R11 | Vice President 18–25 years · verified | $234K – $316K | 40% | $535K $455K – $615K | $150K |
| R12 | Named Executive Officer Executive appointment · verified | $553K – $749K | 125% | $3.78M $3.21M – $4.34M | $1.87M |
| CEO | Chief Executive Officer 25 or more years · verified | $915K – $1.24M | 150% | $17.19M $14.61M – $19.77M | $13.41M |
| Board | Non-Employee Director Senior executive or board background · verified | $85K – $115K | — | $300K $255K – $345K | $200K |
Total Compensation Range by Band
Total compensation in Lake Success, NY across the employee bands. Proxy-disclosed executive cohorts are excluded so the employee bands stay readable.
Global Footprint & Pay Arbitrage
Approximately 16,000 full-time associates across 28 countries at 30 June 2026, with no country or city headcount disclosed anywhere in the FY2026 Form 10-K. The 25 markets priced here are the ones where the bundle carries either an office verification plus a usable pay observation, or an office verification in a country whose pay evidence is strong enough to carry across cities.
Office and market catalogue — calibration factors versus Lake Success, New York
| Location | Likely office profile | Presence | Base | TC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lake Success, NY United States · USD | Corporate headquarters and the anchor market for every figure in this report | FY2026 Form 10-K and official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
New York, NY United States · USD | Client and technology hub and a recurring labour condition application worksite | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Edgewood, NY United States · USD | Operations and technology site and a recurring immigration worksite | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Deer Park, NY United States · USD | Long Island operations site carried at the New York metro anchor | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Newark, NJ United States · USD | Technology site and one of the largest visa worksites in the filing record | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Jersey City, NJ United States · USD | New York metropolitan client and technology site | Official office directory and immigration filings | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Boston, MA United States · USD | Client-facing office serving asset and wealth management clients | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Andover, MA United States · USD | Massachusetts office grouped with Boston in the office directory | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Chicago, IL United States · USD | Client-facing office; office evidence varies across captured directory views | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Kansas City, MO United States · USD | Operations and technology site named in immigration filings | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
El Dorado Hills, CA United States · USD | California office; no Broadridge California pay differential is disclosed | Official office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Coppell, TX United States · USD | Dallas-area technology and operations site concentrated in visa filings | Immigration filings and office directory | 1.00× | 1.00× |
Bangalore (Bengaluru) India · INR | Largest India technology and delivery centre; country-level pay evidence only | Official office directory and 2025 India footprint reporting | 0.04× | 0.04× |
Hyderabad India · INR | India technology and delivery centre carried at the India country calibration | Official office directory and 2025 India footprint reporting | 0.04× | 0.04× |
Mumbai India · INR | India centre closest to financial-services clients; no city premium is disclosed | Official office directory and 2025 India footprint reporting | 0.04× | 0.04× |
London United Kingdom · GBP | Primary United Kingdom client and product location with the strongest UK sample | Official office directory | 0.74× | 0.73× |
Edinburgh United Kingdom · GBP | Scottish office carried at the London calibration for want of city evidence | Official office directory | 0.74× | 0.73× |
Glasgow United Kingdom · GBP | Requested scope market; compensation is United Kingdom country evidence only | Not verified on the current official office page | 0.74× | 0.73× |
Toronto Canada · CAD | Largest Canadian technology and client location with the strongest Canada sample | Official office directory | 0.62× | 0.63× |
Markham Canada · CAD | Greater Toronto office carried at the Toronto calibration | Official office directory | 0.62× | 0.63× |
Montreal Canada · CAD | Quebec office carried at the Canada country calibration | Official office directory | 0.62× | 0.63× |
Sydney Australia · AUD | Primary Australian client-facing office; the public sample is sales-heavy and tiny | Official office directory | 0.45× | 0.44× |
Melbourne Australia · AUD | Australian office carried at the Sydney calibration with no city-specific sample | Official office directory | 0.45× | 0.44× |
Dublin Ireland · EUR | European office with one small engineering total-pay sample and nothing above it | Official office directory | 0.63× | 0.65× |
Hong Kong Hong Kong · HKD | Regional client-facing office; every observation is a single-submission range | Official office directory | 0.62× | 0.63× |
The official office directory is the primary verification source. Glasgow appears here as a requested scope market that could not be verified on the current official page, and it carries United Kingdom country evidence only. Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Paris, Zurich, Stockholm, Warsaw, Bucharest, Luxembourg, Singapore, Tokyo and Mexico City are verified or requested Broadridge locations in the source bundle but carry no Broadridge pay evidence of any kind, so they are omitted from the pricing table rather than given an invented factor.
Lake Success, New York anchor medians — the basis of every modeled cell
| Band | Base | Stock | Bonus | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | $90K | $0 | $3K | — | $93K |
| R3 | $100K | $2K | $2K | — | $105K |
| R4 | $125K | $4K | $6K | — | $135K |
| R5 | $140K | $7K | $11K | — | $158K |
| R6 | $150K | $10K | $15K | — | $175K |
| R6S | $210K | $15K | $21K | — | $246K |
| R7 | $225K | $25K | $34K | — | $284K |
| R9 | $227K | $45K | $45K | — | $318K |
| R11 | $275K | $150K | $110K | — | $535K |
| R12 | $651K | $1.87M | $802K | $457K | $3.78M |
| CEO | $1.08M | $13.41M | $1.55M | $1.15M | $17.19M |
| Board | $100K | $200K | $0 | — | $300K |
- The anchor is the New York metropolitan area around the Lake Success headquarters. Broadridge posts base ranges for United States technology roles, and those postings plus one Levels.fyi component split are what every other market is calibrated against.
- India factors come from the observed ratios rather than any company policy: a process analyst at roughly four percent of the United States analyst midpoint, a software engineer base at about seven percent of the United States base on Glassdoor, an assistant vice president at about fourteen percent of the United States director wage and a vice president at about nineteen percent of the United States posting midpoint.
- United Kingdom factors come from a London software engineer base of £44,000 to £62,000 against the United States anchor, with the senior-end factors derived from project and product manager total-pay observations of £59,000 to £110,000 and £72,000 to £116,000.
- Canada factors come from Toronto: an associate engineer total of C$74,000 to C$89,000, a Levels.fyi engineer total of C$99,800, a senior engineer total of C$97,000 to C$119,000 and a director of software engineering posting at C$150,000 to C$180,000, which is the source of the downward slope at the top of the Canadian ladder.
- Australia, Ireland and Hong Kong carry flat factors because every observation in those markets is a single submission. Sydney's sample is sales-heavy, Dublin has one small engineering range and Hong Kong's four observations move in no consistent direction with seniority.
Model rules
- All twelve United States locations carry a factor of exactly 1.00. Broadridge discloses no geographic pay differential and the captured visa views carried no reliable city medians, so inventing a Kansas City or Coppell discount would be fabrication rather than modelling.
- India, the United Kingdom and Canada carry level-dependent factors because the sources show the gap narrowing or widening with seniority. Australia, Ireland and Hong Kong carry flat factors because the samples cannot support a curve.
- Total compensation is rebuilt from base plus bonus plus equity in every band, with an all-other-compensation column only on the proxy rows. No notional employer benefit load, no statutory contribution and no perquisite value is added to any total.
- Executive rows are excluded from the range chart. Their anchor figures are single worldwide proxy disclosures and applying a city factor to them produces a meaningless number, which is why they carry the highest seniority values and are flagged rather than plotted.
- Foreign exchange is a single snapshot taken on 24 August 2026. Local pay does not reset when a rate moves, so the converted figures are for comparability only.
- City evidence is never manufactured from country evidence. Hyderabad, Mumbai, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Markham, Montreal and Melbourne all carry their country calibration explicitly, and the profile column says so.
Variable Pay & Annual Cash Incentive
Broadridge names its incentive plans and publishes none of their rates. The Associate Guide identifies five short-term incentive plan families, generally aligned to the 30 June fiscal year, without a single target percentage, payout curve, eligibility code or payment month for ordinary associates. Only the named-executive layer is quantified, and it is quantified in full.
| Band | Target | Mechanism | Recent payout |
|---|---|---|---|
R1–R6 Individual contributor strata | Not publicly disclosed | The guide identifies World Class Service and Management by Objectives as associate short-term incentive programmes. Broadridge job advertisements describe these roles as bonus eligible, which confirms a plan exists for the role and establishes nothing about its size. The bonus figures shown in this report's ladder are modeled from the single observed component split, not from a disclosed target. | Not publicly disclosed |
R7–R9 Management strata | Not publicly disclosed | Management by Objectives is identified as a plan family covering management populations, but no target percentage, threshold, maximum or eligibility code is published. Manager and director postings state bonus eligibility without a rate. | Not publicly disclosed |
R11 Vice-president stratum | Not publicly disclosed | Senior leaders may participate in Management by Objectives or the Executive Leadership Team MBO, but no universal vice-president target exists in public sources and no title maps to an Executive E code, so no threshold can be asserted. | Not publicly disclosed |
R12 Named executive officers | 84% to 150% of salary | The FY2025 scorecard was weighted 70 percent financial, 25 percent strategic and leadership and 5 percent client satisfaction and net promoter score. Targets were 150 percent for the chief executive and the president, 125 percent for the president of global technology and operations, 90 percent for the chief legal officer and a weighted 84 percent for the chief financial officer because of a midyear transition. | Approximately 95% to 98% of target in FY2025 |
CEO Chief executive officer | 150% of salary | The same FY2025 named-executive scorecard, applied to a $1,076,667 salary, produced $1,552,705 of non-equity incentive. | Approximately 96% of target in FY2025 |
Executive incentive targets — percent of salary
Named-executive outcomes
| Executive | Target | Paid | Attainment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy C. Gokey | $1,615,000 | $1,552,705 | About 96% of a 150% target |
| Christopher D. Perry | $1,139,250 | $1,098,971 | About 96% of a 150% target |
| Thomas P. Carey | $813,864 | $801,547 | About 98% of a 125% target |
| Hope M. Jarkowski | $522,000 | $495,096 | About 95% of a 90% target |
| Ashima Ghei | $502,500 | $482,434 | About 96% of a transition-weighted target |
Employee payout timing and history
No employee payout history exists in public sources at any level below the named executives. Broadridge publishes no bonus target grid, no threshold or maximum curve, no eligibility rule by career-framework code and no payment month. The proxy states that client satisfaction is part of every full-time associate's compensation, which implies a broader scorecard component than the 5 percent weighting shown in the executive table, but the associate-level weight is not disclosed.
Sales and special incentives
The Associate Guide confirms that targeted sales short-term incentive plans exist for eligible sales roles, and the Global Career Framework carries dedicated Sales Professional S1 to S6 and Sales Management K1 to K5 bands. No commission rate, quota mechanic, accelerator, cap or eligibility formula is public. The only sales-adjacent pay observations in the bundle are three single-submission Australian ranges: a pre-sales director at A$212,000 to A$231,000 and a sales director at A$195,000 to A$213,000 in total pay.
Equity — RSUs, PSUs, Options & ESPP
Equity mechanics are official and the employee threshold is not. The 2018 Omnibus Award Plan is the live vehicle, options and both time-based and performance RSUs are all actively granted, and the Associate Guide says employee awards depend on Global Career Framework job level or grade and performance. What it never says is which code qualifies, what an ordinary associate receives or how often.
- FY2026 grant activity was 539,247 stock options at a $191.77 weighted-average exercise price and a $46.64 weighted-average grant-date fair value, 262,266 time-based RSUs at a $216.06 weighted grant-date fair value and 122,962 performance RSUs at $217.50.
- Options exercised during FY2026 totalled 207,291 shares at a $104.01 weighted exercise price, with a company-reported aggregate intrinsic value of about $29.0 million.
- FY2026 stock-based compensation expense was approximately $121.1 million. Unrecognised expense at year end was about $51 million for options, $64 million for time-based RSUs and $15 million for performance RSUs.
- The 4.8 million shares remaining are a plan reserve, not an accounting liability and not a pool of employee wealth. At the $184.82 reference share price that reserve is worth roughly $887 million on a gross basis only.
- Grant-date fair value for options is a model output that reflects volatility, expected term and other assumptions. It is not the spread between the exercise price and the market price and should never be read as one.
FY2026 equity activity
Vesting — common reported employee schedule
The four-year ratable schedule is the general option rule disclosed in the FY2026 Form 10-K; individual award agreements can differ. Named-executive performance RSUs do not follow it: they run a three-year performance period and settle at 0 to 150 percent of target. No FY2025 performance RSU settlement occurred because Broadridge moved from two-year to three-year periods, which is a timing artifact and not a zero-performance year.
Eligibility by hierarchy level
- The mechanism is official: the Associate Guide says long-term incentive grants are based on Global Career Framework job level or grade and performance, and may take the form of RSUs, performance RSUs or stock options.
- The threshold is not. No public source establishes a minimum qualifying code, an ordinary-employee grant value, a grant frequency or a percentage-of-salary target, so statements such as equity starts at lead level or a P4 receives a set number of shares have no support.
- The only fully evidenced employee equity figure anywhere in the sources is $2,200 of annualised stock in one United States software engineer record. Every other equity number in this report's ladder is modeled and labelled as such.
- Non-employee directors receive a $200,000 annual equity retainer delivered in deferred stock units and options, with a further $67,500 equity component for the lead independent director.
- Broadridge shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange, so no secondary-market liquidity programme is needed for Indian employees. Brokerage, foreign-asset reporting, foreign-exchange and local tax rules still apply to them.
- Restricted awards ordinarily require continued employment through the applicable dates and can be forfeited on departure, subject to the plan and award terms.
Indicative annual grant value by band — Lake Success, NY
| Band | Annual value (USD) | Median | Shares at $184.82 |
|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | $2K – $3K | $2K | ~9–15 |
| R4 | $3K – $5K | $4K | ~16–27 |
| R5 | $5K – $9K | $7K | ~28–47 |
| R6 | $8K – $13K | $10K | ~41–68 |
| R6S | $11K – $19K | $15K | ~61–101 |
| R7 | $19K – $31K | $25K | ~101–169 |
| R9 | $34K – $56K | $45K | ~183–304 |
| R11 | $113K – $188K | $150K | ~609–1,015 |
| R12 | $1.40M – $2.33M | $1.87M | ~7,571–12,618 |
| CEO | $10.06M – $16.77M | $13.41M | ~54,429–90,715 |
| Board | $150K – $250K | $200K | ~812–1,353 |
Annualized planning value (±25%), not the face value of every new-hire grant. Share equivalents use the $184.82 reference price at 2026-08-25 and ignore plan valuation rules and PSU performance. Highlighted rows are disclosed grant-date stock awards.
Named executive target equity
| Executive | Target | Units / structure |
|---|---|---|
Timothy C. Gokey Chief Executive Officer | About $13.3 million | Roughly 50 percent stock options and 50 percent performance RSUs |
Christopher D. Perry President | Within the $1.0 million to $4.1 million non-CEO range | FY2025 grants of $1,991,214 in stock awards and $2,143,553 in option awards |
Thomas P. Carey President, Global Technology and Operations | Within the $1.0 million to $4.1 million non-CEO range | FY2025 grants of $898,472 in stock awards and $967,192 in option awards |
Hope M. Jarkowski Chief Legal Officer | Within the $1.0 million to $4.1 million non-CEO range | FY2025 grants of $728,358 in stock awards and $784,178 in option awards |
Ashima Ghei Chief Financial Officer | Within the $1.0 million to $4.1 million non-CEO range | FY2025 grants of $145,549 in stock awards and $888,793 in option awards, reflecting a midyear appointment rather than a full-year design |
Executive Compensation
FY2025 is the latest definitive named-executive year, one fiscal year behind the FY2026 financial and equity accounting used elsewhere in this report. Five officers are disclosed in full, and everything below them is dark.
Reading the package
Salary is about 6.3 percent of the chief executive's FY2025 reported total and equity about 78 percent, split almost evenly between $6,459,215 of stock awards and $6,953,485 of option awards. That option weighting is the distinguishing feature of Broadridge's design: the FY2025 long-term target of roughly $13.3 million was structured about half in options and half in performance RSUs, so a large share of the reported package only produces value above a $191.77-era exercise price. Grant-date accounting values are not cash received.
Broadridge's disclosed chief executive total sits below all three of these public comparators, but the ranking is fragile. The Fiserv figure is inflated by first-year replacement and sign-on awards, the SS&C figure reflects a founder-chief executive with a very different ownership and design position, and none of the four companies is the same size or at the same point in its performance cycle. Employee pay competitiveness cannot be inferred from any of it.
Named Executive Officers & Board
Public corporate materials identify Timothy Gokey as chief executive and Christopher Perry as president, alongside the chief financial officer, segment presidents and functional officers. The Global Career Framework places Executive levels E1 to E4 below the chief executive, but Broadridge maps no named individual to an E code.
Ashima Ghei was appointed chief financial officer in December 2024, so her FY2025 row is not a full-year chief financial officer package: her $145,549 of stock awards against $888,793 of option awards reflects a transition design rather than a steady-state mix, and her annual incentive target was blended to about 84 percent. Christopher Perry joined the board alongside Trish Mosconi in February 2026 and receives no incremental director compensation as an employee director. Peter Reali was appointed to lead the institutional governance business in March 2026, with no individual compensation disclosed.
Board compensation framework
| Element | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cash retainer | $100,000 | Paid to each non-employee director under the FY2025 programme |
| Annual equity retainer | $200,000 | Delivered in deferred stock units and options, generally granted in November |
| Lead independent director additional retainer | $140,000 | Split $72,500 in cash and $67,500 in equity on top of the standard retainers |
| Employee directors | No incremental compensation | Directors who are also employees receive nothing additional for board service |
A non-employee director's disclosed programme value of $300,000 is roughly 3.8 times the $79,503 median associate compensation used in the pay-ratio calculation, and roughly two thirds of it is equity. Committee chair and membership fees beyond the lead independent director arrangement are not separately itemised in the sources used here.
Regional heads and other officers
Compensation for every leader outside the five named executives is not public. There is no vice-president table, no executive-level range and no disclosure for the Executive E1 to E4 population as a whole. A leader's pay becomes visible only if they become a named executive officer or if material employment terms are separately filed.
Insider Trades — SEC Forms 3/4/5
Broadridge is a New York Stock Exchange issuer, so Section 16 insiders report on Forms 3, 4 and 5. Indian promoter and stock-exchange disclosure regimes do not apply merely because the company employs several thousand people in India.
| Date | Person | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-27 | Douglas DeSchutter President, Investor Communication Solutions | Sale Open-market disposition at a weighted-average price; plan status appears in the Form 4 footnotes. | 5,056 | $239.55 | $1.21M |
| 2025-08-25 | Timothy C. Gokey Chief Executive Officer | Sale Executed under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted on 14 May 2025, which is the only trade in this set explicitly tied to a pre-adopted plan. | 5,674 | $258.37 | $1.47M |
| 2026-03-06 | Timothy C. Gokey Chief Executive Officer | Purchase Open-market purchase of more than $1 million. A purchase can reflect confidence, but a filing alone does not establish intent. | 5,300 | $194.49 | $1.03M |
| 2026-08-12 | Timothy C. Gokey Chief Executive Officer | Settlement Performance award settlement reported at a zero transaction price, with a disclosed vesting date of 1 October 2026. The value shown is a gross reference at the $184.82 share price before performance conditions, withholding and tax. | 33,265 | $0.00 | $6.15M |
| 2026-08-12 | Christopher D. Perry President | Settlement Performance award settlement; gross reference value at the $184.82 report-date share price. | 9,308 | $0.00 | $1.72M |
| 2026-08-12 | Thomas P. Carey President, Global Technology and Operations | Settlement Performance award settlement; gross reference value at the $184.82 report-date share price. | 5,275 | $0.00 | $975K |
| 2026-08-12 | Richard J. Stingi Executive officer | Settlement Performance award settlement; gross reference value at the $184.82 report-date share price. | 2,172 | $0.00 | $401K |
| 2026-08-12 | Douglas DeSchutter President, Investor Communication Solutions | Settlement Performance award settlement; gross reference value at the $184.82 report-date share price. | 1,783 | $0.00 | $330K |
| 2026-08-12 | Ashima Ghei Chief Financial Officer | Settlement The smallest settlement in the August 2026 group, consistent with a December 2024 appointment that left little of the completed performance cycle behind her. | 466 | $0.00 | $86K |
Reading guide
Benefits & Perks
United States benefits are documented in unusual detail because Broadridge publishes a current Associate Guide. Every other market in this report shows statutory floors, because no comparable official local guide was located for India, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Ireland or Hong Kong.
United States
- Medical — Three 2026 plan options. Traditional Choice Plus, SavingsPlus HSA and Basic Plus. Traditional Choice Plus carries an in-network deductible of $900 for an individual and $2,000 for a family. Payroll rates, networks and plan documents govern actual cost sharing. [official]
- Health savings — Employer HSA contribution. $500 for associate-only coverage and $1,000 for family coverage under the 2026 SavingsPlus design, subject to health savings account eligibility and plan election. [official]
- Retirement — 401(k) basic contribution and match. A company basic contribution starts at 1 percent after six months and rises with service to 6.25 percent. The match is $0.70 per dollar on the first 6 percent contributed, rising to $0.80 after five years of service. Company contributions are 50 percent vested after two years and fully vested after three. [official]
- Retirement — Executive Retirement Savings Plan. Available to active Executive Level E participants and to specified legacy letter-grade D through H participants as of 31 October 2024. The legacy reference is a plan-eligibility artifact, not a current framework crosswalk. [official]
- Time off — Flexible PTO and accrued vacation. Exempt associates have flexible paid time off with no stated accrual limit. Non-exempt associates receive 15 days below ten years of service and 20 days at ten years or more, plus floating holidays, sick time and other disclosed leave. [official]
- Family — New-parent pay. Up to nine weeks at 100 percent of pay within 12 months of the birth or placement, subject to the guide's eligibility and coordination rules. [official]
- Income protection — Short-term and long-term disability. Short-term disability can continue up to 26 weeks. Company-paid long-term disability replaces 40 percent of base salary up to $15,000 a month, with an optional buy-up to 60 percent up to $22,500 a month. [official]
- Learning — Tuition reimbursement. Up to $5,250 a year for eligible associates, subject to course and approval requirements, alongside the Global Career Framework development resources. [official]
Global programs
- Career — Global Career Framework. A globally aligned architecture of roughly 20 functions, 90 job families, eight career bands and 39 coded levels plus the chief executive. It is the clearest piece of compensation infrastructure Broadridge publishes, and the pay attached to each code is entirely absent. [official]
- Pay governance — Market pricing and pay-equity testing. Broadridge states that it prices roles to market and periodically tests pay equity using audited data and third-party statistical modelling. It publishes no granular test outcome, no adjusted or unadjusted gap and no remediation figure. [official]
- Merit — Annual base-pay review. United States base pay is generally reviewed annually against individual performance, market movement and an approved budget, using salary as of 30 June with a 31 March participation cutoff and manager-allocated merit pools. No equivalent global calendar was located. [official]
- Recognition — ACE and Global Recognition programmes. Formal recognition programmes are described in the guide and corporate people materials. Award values, nomination quotas and country-level implementation are not quantified anywhere. [official]
- Wellbeing — Employee assistance and counselling. The United States guide describes counselling and coaching support. Local availability, provider and session limits can vary by country and are not published. [official]
- Community — Volunteer and disaster leave. The United States guide describes volunteer and disaster leave. Local terms vary and no global entitlement value was located. [official]
- Work model — Hybrid and flexible arrangements. Corporate materials discuss flexibility, but no global days-in-office requirement, remote-work allowance or home-office equipment budget was found in any public source. [npd]
- Total rewards — Statement refresh cadence. Total-rewards statements are refreshed twice a year: in spring after open enrolment and in autumn after the fiscal-year-end performance and compensation process. [official]
Benefit fields not publicly quantified
The asymmetry here is the finding, not a gap in the research. Broadridge publishes a detailed current United States Associate Guide and no verified local equivalent anywhere else, so a reader comparing a Bangalore offer with a Lake Success offer can compare statutory floors against a full plan design and nothing more. Provident Fund treatment above the statutory rate, India medical sum insured and parent cover, United Kingdom employer pension rate and private medical, Australian super above 12 percent, and every Canadian, Irish and Hong Kong company benefit remain undisclosed.
Performance Review & Pay Progression
The United States merit architecture is disclosed in outline and none of its numbers are. Broadridge publishes when the process runs, who participates and how managers allocate, while withholding the target rate, the rating scale and every increase percentage.
Not publicly disclosed
Modeled promotion planning timeline
| Band | Years to next scope | Promotion hike | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1–2 years to R2 on external career-market estimates, not company policy | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R2 | 1–3 years to R3 on external career-market estimates | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R3 | 2–4 years to R4 on external career-market estimates | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R4 | 2–4 years to R5 on external career-market estimates | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R5 | 2–5 years to R6 or R7 depending on the expert or management split | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R6 | 2–5 years to a management or specialist principal role | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R6S | Not publicly disclosed; specialist roles are posted rather than promoted into | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R7 | 2–5 years to a director role, with selection rather than tenure deciding | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R9 | 3–6 or more years to a vice-president role; highly selective | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R11 | Not publicly disclosed; appointment rather than progression | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| R12 | Committee and board appointment | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| CEO | Board appointment | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
| Board | Annual re-election | Not disclosed | Modeled planning interval |
What the guide does disclose about the United States cycle is specific: base salary is generally reviewed annually against individual performance, market movement and an approved budget; associates generally must start by 31 March to participate, with specified trainees and contingent workers excluded; the process uses salary as of 30 June and prorates the target by eligible days; and managers receive a merit pool they may allocate above or below individual targets while staying within it. That last mechanic matters more than it looks, because it means two associates with identical ratings in different teams can receive different increases without any policy being broken.
Pay progression evidence
The promotion timings shown in this report's ladder are external career-market estimates and not company policy. Broadridge quantifies no promotion velocity, no time-in-level expectation and no promotion increase, and salary platforms cannot tell a promotee from a new hire or an internal transfer, so no internal-versus-external comparison is possible from public data. The one structural fact worth carrying is that the framework's parallel Professional, Sales, Management and Executive bands confirm that a technical expert is not forced into management to progress, without disclosing where the tracks diverge or what it costs to switch.
H-1B / LCA Visa Footprint — United States
United States labour condition application filings are the only large sample of Broadridge base wages that exists in public. They are offered base wages for specific sponsored roles, not market medians and not total compensation, and three aggregators produce three different pictures of the same employer.
Dataset summary
| Dataset | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Labour condition application wage file, FY2026 | 23 filings, 100 percent certified, $137,962 median, $145,249 average | The primary series used in this report. Wages are offered base salary tied to a filing, so they exclude bonus, equity and benefits entirely. |
| Alternative aggregator, FY2026 | Approximately $133,500 median | A different normalisation and snapshot date produces a median roughly $4,500 below the primary series on the same employer and fiscal year. |
| Employer visa overview | Separates labour condition applications from petition outcomes | Applications, vacancies and adjudicated petitions are three different units. Counts from these datasets should never be added together or compared directly. |
| Multi-year series, FY2023 to FY2026 | 110, 126, 110 and 23 filings with medians of $137,127, $143,752, $144,623 and $137,962 | FY2024 was certified at 96.03 percent and carries a $1,788,668 maximum that is plainly an outlier and should not be read as a band. The FY2026 count is small because the year was still open at the research date. |
City-level H-1B wage history
| City | P25 | Median | P75 | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
All observed FY2026 worksites Coppell, Edgewood, Newark and New York recur across the filing record, but the captured public views carried no reliable city-level medians or counts, so no city statistic is manufactured here. This row is the whole FY2026 displayed set. | $130K | $137,962 | $162K | 23 |
All-years aggregates. P25/P75 are rounded reconstruction values marked modeled; medians and record counts are the stronger fields.
Selected title / worksite records
| Title | Worksite | Proffered wage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Director, database | United States | $227,293 | The FY2026 maximum and the figure this report uses as the R9 anchor base, because it is the only director-level number tied to a filing rather than a posting envelope. |
| Median FY2026 filing | United States | $137,962 | Sits between this report's R5 and R6 anchor bases, which is roughly where a sponsored senior technology role would be expected to fall. |
| Lowest FY2026 filing | United States | $97,406 | Close to the R3 software engineer anchor base of $100,000 and the only FY2026 wage below six figures. |
| FY2025 range | United States | $67,143 to $333,119 | 110 filings at a $144,623 median. The width of the range across a single year shows how much role scope rather than level drives these numbers. |
Reading the data correctly
- An offered wage is a base salary tied to a specific sponsored role and location. It excludes bonus, equity, retirement contributions and every benefit, so it is not comparable to the total compensation figures in this report's ladder.
- Labour condition applications, job vacancies and adjudicated immigration petitions are conceptually different units, and the three aggregators covering Broadridge define and refresh them differently. Merging their counts produces a number that describes nothing.
- Sponsored roles skew technical and skew toward the worksites that concentrate them, so this sample is not representative of Broadridge's roughly 16,000 associates or even of its United States population.
- The FY2026 count of 23 is small because the fiscal year was still open at the research date, and small samples move sharply with one filing.
- No city median is claimed anywhere in this section. Coppell, Edgewood, Newark and New York recur as worksites, but reliable city percentiles were not available in the captured public views.
Key Nuances & Insights
Broadridge publishes eight Global Career Framework career bands and 39 coded levels plus the chief executive in its own Associate Guide. It publishes no title-to-code map, no code-level experience expectation, no salary range, no incentive target and no employee grant table. Every ordinary-employee number in this report therefore comes from outside the company.
R1 through R13 exists only because salary platforms and job advertisements expose titles rather than framework codes. It normalises observations across the operations, technical, management and executive tracks so they can be compared. Reading it as a crosswalk to W, B, T, S, P, K, M or E would be a mistake.
Engineering-management postings run $200,000 to $250,000 while the cross-function director envelope runs $125,000 to $227,293. A cloud engineering manager and a finance director can occupy the same analytical stratum with a gap of more than $100,000 between them, which is why this report anchors the management rows on the technology reading and says so.
Specialised cloud and platform principal postings sit at $200,000 to $220,000 against a $145,000 to $155,000 generic senior lead range at comparable experience. That forty percent step is a scarcity premium on a skill, not a higher rung on the ladder, and it is carried as a separate row rather than averaged into the median.
Glassdoor puts an India software engineer base central at ₹7.0 lakh while Levels.fyi reports a total point of ₹19.5 lakh for the same title. Different samples, tenure, business units, reporting dates and total-pay definitions can all produce that. This report preserves both signals and refuses to average them, because the midpoint of two incompatible measures describes nobody.
Hyderabad, Mumbai, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Markham, Montreal and Melbourne all carry their country's calibration explicitly, because no Broadridge city-level pay observation exists for any of them. No city-level headcount is disclosed either, so this report never claims Bengaluru is larger than Hyderabad.
The Associate Guide confirms that long-term incentive awards depend on career-framework level or grade and performance, and that RSUs, performance RSUs and options are all used. Which code qualifies, what an ordinary associate receives and how often are all absent, and no public statement supports a claim that equity begins at any particular level.
No broad purchase plan appears in the FY2026 Form 10-K or the 2025 proxy. For a reader comparing a Broadridge offer with a large-cap technology offer, the absence of a 15 percent discounted plan removes what is often the most predictable piece of an ordinary employee's equity value.
Six of the nine insider filings shown here report a $0 transaction price because they record award settlements. Gross market reference, tax withholding and later sale proceeds are three separate measures, and none of them is zero.
No performance RSUs settled in FY2025 because Broadridge moved from two-year to three-year performance periods. That is a timing artifact. Reading it as a failed performance year, or comparing FY2025 realised equity with FY2023 on equal terms, would be wrong.
FY2026 revenue, headcount, grant activity and share-plan reserve are all available, while the latest definitive named-executive table is FY2025. Every executive figure in this report is therefore one fiscal year behind every operating figure beside it.
The 216 to 1 ratio uses a $79,503 median associate drawn from roughly 16,000 people across 28 countries, including a India population reported at about 5,500. A United States-only employer with the same executive package would disclose a materially lower ratio, so cross-company ratio comparisons are close to meaningless without the workforce mix beside them.
Every Australian observation in the sources is a single submission, and two of the three are sales-function roles. They are enough to place the market roughly and not enough to support a technical or operations band table, which is why Sydney and Melbourne carry flat factors with no seniority curve.
The Associate Guide's reference to letter grades D through H appears only in Executive Retirement Savings Plan eligibility as of 31 October 2024. It is not a bridge from the pre-2007 ADP structure or from any acquisition to a current framework code, and no such bridge is public.
Research control
Against Fiserv, FIS and SS&C, Broadridge discloses the least about employee pay and among the most about career structure. Its chief executive total of $17.19 million is the lowest of the four, though the Fiserv figure is distorted by first-year replacement awards and the SS&C figure by founder ownership. On employee compensation there is no meaningful comparison to make: none of the four publishes a salary band, and the observation samples for Broadridge are thinner than for a comparable technology employer of similar size because a large share of its population sits in operations and delivery roles that salary platforms cover poorly.
Evidence classification
| Label | Meaning | Examples and permitted use |
|---|---|---|
| Verified | A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, an official Broadridge publication such as the Associate Guide or office directory, a government rule, or a Broadridge job posting with a stated base range. | Used as primary evidence with its date and scope preserved. Every executive, equity, benefit and career-framework figure in this report is of this class. |
| Reported | A public administrative dataset derived from filings, such as a labour condition application wage, or an established salary platform observation with a visible Broadridge sample. | Used for role-specific wages and market context, never generalised to the whole population, and shown with the source conflict intact where two platforms disagree. |
| Modeled | An anchor observation carried to another city by a calibration factor and a single foreign-exchange snapshot, or a bonus or equity component scaled from the one published component split. | Planning envelope only. The bonus and equity columns for every band above R3 are of this class, as is every non-anchor city cell. |
| Not publicly disclosed | A field with no public evidence at any grade. | Stated as undisclosed rather than filled with an industry estimate. The employee incentive target grid and the equity eligibility threshold are the two largest examples. |
Explicit “Not publicly disclosed” index
Known gaps and diligence before relying on a cell
- 1The bonus and equity columns for bands R1 through R11 are modeled, not disclosed. Broadridge publishes no employee incentive target and no employee grant table, so those figures are scaled from the single Levels.fyi component split at R3 within the named-executive target band of 84 to 150 percent. They are planning envelopes and should not be quoted as Broadridge targets.
- 2The R2 row has no direct United States observation and is interpolated between the R1 posting midpoint and the R3 Levels.fyi point. It is the only fully modeled base in the ladder.
- 3The R9 row merges the director and senior director strata and anchors on the $227,293 FY2026 senior director visa wage rather than the $180,000 cross-function director envelope midpoint. Using the midpoint would have placed directors below engineering managers, which is what the raw sources show but which reflects function mix rather than a real inversion of the ladder.
- 4The R12 and CEO rows are single worldwide proxy disclosures and are marked chart-excluded. They carry the two highest seniority values, which means the India, United Kingdom and Canada top-of-ladder factors interpolate toward them; the factors themselves were calibrated at the vice-president level, so the executive cells in those markets should be read as arithmetic rather than as evidence of what a country executive earns.
- 5All twelve United States locations carry a factor of exactly 1.00. Broadridge discloses no geographic differential and the captured visa views carried no city medians, so no Kansas City, Coppell or El Dorado Hills discount is applied even though one almost certainly exists.
- 6Eleven verified or requested Broadridge locations from the source bundle are omitted from the pricing table entirely, because they carry no Broadridge pay evidence of any kind: Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Paris, Zurich, Stockholm, Warsaw, Bucharest, Luxembourg, Singapore, Tokyo and Mexico City.
- 7The two India sources conflict by nearly three times at the software engineer level. The India calibration in this report follows the Glassdoor base observations because they cover more strata, and the Levels.fyi total points are recorded separately rather than blended in.
- 8No notional employer benefit load is added anywhere. Total compensation is rebuilt from base plus bonus plus equity, with an all-other-compensation column only on the two proxy rows, so the totals here are pay rather than employer cost.
- 9The chief financial officer's incentive target in the outcomes table is stated as the transition-weighted target implied by her disclosed attainment, because her December 2024 appointment means salary multiplied by the disclosed 84 percent does not reconstruct her actual opportunity.
- 10India headcount is reported at two different figures a year apart: a plan to reach about 6,800 technology staff reported in January 2025 and about 5,500 total associates reported in November 2025. Neither is a company filing, and the two count different populations, so both are carried rather than reconciled.
FX rates used — 1 USD equals, snapshot 2026-08-24
Single-date conversion layer for comparability; it ignores payroll-date FX, tax, purchasing power, benefits valuation and hedging. Compensation intelligence, not legal, tax, investment, immigration or employment advice.
Source register — 15 sources
| S1 | Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2026 · Broadridge, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-08-04. Headcount, countries of operation, revenue, share-plan reserve, grant and exercise activity, and stock-based compensation expense |
| S2 | 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement · Broadridge, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission · 2025-09-19. FY2025 named-executive compensation, incentive targets and outcomes, long-term award design, pay ratio and director compensation |
| S3 | 2026 U.S. Associate Guide, Total Rewards and Global Career Framework · Broadridge · 2026. The official career framework, United States merit process, incentive and long-term plan families, pay-equity testing and United States benefits |
| S4 | People and Communities · Broadridge · 2026-08-26. Corporate people and total-rewards programmes, recognition and wellbeing |
| S5 | Global office directory · Broadridge · 2026-08-26. Office verification for every market in the location table |
| S6 | India technology headcount expansion report · Reuters · 2025-01-23. Plan to raise India technology headcount by 26 percent to about 6,800 over three years |
| S7 | India footprint and technology role · ETBFSI · 2025-11-04. About 5,500 associates reported across Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Mumbai |
| S8 | Software engineer compensation, United States and India · Levels.fyi · 2026-08-26. The United States component split used as the R3 anchor and the conflicting India total points |
| S9 | Broadridge salary pages for India, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Hong Kong · Glassdoor · 2026-08-26. Role ranges and country calibration for every non-United States market in the location table |
| S10 | Broadridge careers, Workday job postings · Broadridge · 2026-08-26. United States and Canada role-specific base ranges behind the R1, R4, R5, R6, R6S, R7 and R11 anchors |
| S11 | Labour condition application wage records · H1B Screener, with cross-checks against H1BGrader and MyVisaJobs · 2026-08-26. FY2023 to FY2026 offered base wage series and the $227,293 senior director figure used as the R9 anchor |
| S12 | Section 16 Forms 4 for August 2025 through August 2026 · Broadridge insiders, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-08-14. Insider sales, the March 2026 open-market purchase and the August 2026 performance award settlements |
| S13 | 2026 proxy statements for FIS, SS&C Technologies and Fiserv · Peer issuers, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026. Peer chief executive totals for FY2025 |
| S14 | Statutory benefit authorities · Employees' Provident Fund Organisation and Ministry of Labour (India), UK Government and The Pensions Regulator, Australian Taxation Office, Fair Work Ombudsman and Services Australia · 2026. Statutory floors for provident fund, gratuity, maternity, auto-enrolment pension, annual leave, superannuation and parental leave |
| S15 | Historical currency table · XE · 2026-08-24. The single foreign-exchange snapshot behind every conversion in this report |
Recent News & Workforce Trend
No broad employee salary-hike announcement, pay freeze, compensation cut or restructuring charge tied to employee pay was located for FY2025 or FY2026. What the record does contain is a large India expansion, a chief financial officer transition, a chief executive open-market purchase and a cluster of performance award settlements.
Broadridge discloses a single global headcount and a country count and nothing else. The two India figures come from a news report and a trade interview a year apart, count different populations and cannot be reconciled into a series, so both are carried as they were reported. United States and other country headcounts cannot be derived from the FY2026 Form 10-K at all.
The midyear appointment changed her FY2025 incentive target to a weighted approximately 84 percent and produced an unusual long-term award mix of $145,549 in stock awards against $888,793 in option awards. Her FY2025 row is not a full-year chief financial officer package and should not be read as one.
Reuters reported a plan to increase India technology staff by 26 percent to approximately 6,800 over three years, mostly software engineers. Sustained hiring at that scale usually raises market-adjustment pressure, but no companywide increase percentage was disclosed alongside it.
Timothy Gokey sold 5,674 shares for about $1.466 million at a $258.37 weighted-average price under a Rule 10b5-1 plan adopted on 14 May 2025. It is the only trade in the insider record explicitly tied to a plan adopted before the trade.
A trade publication put the India population at about 5,500 across Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Mumbai, confirming India as the largest disclosed workforce outside the United States. Country-specific review timing and pay treatment remain undisclosed.
Perry joined as an employee director and therefore receives no incremental board compensation under the disclosed programme, which pays non-employee directors a $100,000 cash and $200,000 equity retainer.
Timothy Gokey bought 5,300 shares at a $194.49 weighted-average price. It is the only acquisition in the insider record funded with an executive's own cash rather than by a company grant, and it is relevant to ownership rather than to employee compensation policy.
A senior leadership appointment in the institutional governance business. Individual compensation was not disclosed in any source used here, which is the normal outcome for a leader outside the five named executive officers.
Reported $7.4768 billion of revenue, approximately 16,000 full-time associates across 28 countries, 4.8 million shares remaining under the 2018 Omnibus Award Plan, FY2026 grant activity and about $121.1 million of stock-based compensation expense. It refreshes the accounting while the latest definitive compensation table remains FY2025.
Zero-price Form 4 acquisitions recorded 33,265 shares for the chief executive, 9,308 for the president, 5,275 for the president of global technology and operations, 2,172 and 1,783 for two further officers and 466 for the chief financial officer. The cluster reflects the completion of a performance cycle under the three-year design, not a new grant.