How Arista Networks Pays
L2–5L engineering and M1–M4 management levels, compensation across 18 global markets, the Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and 15%-discount ESPP, filed executive bonus design, 2025 named-executive pay, insider Forms 4/144 and FY2026 H-1B wages.
Band Hierarchy
Arista’s externally observable engineering ladder runs L2 → 3L → 3H → 4L → 4H → 5L, with a management track M1 → M4 and a filed corporate-officer layer above it. The catalogue is an inferred career architecture for benchmarking, not an official HR grade map.
Technical / individual-contributor track
Management / leadership track
Corporate-officer layer above M4
Hierarchy qualifications
- Arista’s public salary pages and employee submissions commonly use engineering labels such as L2, 3L, 3H, 4L, 4H and 5L. Arista’s filings do not publish a company-wide mapping of those labels to corporate grades, so the catalogue is an inferred career architecture built from reported levels, official job titles, H-1B titles and executive ranks — suitable for benchmarking, not for determining an employee’s internal HR grade.
- No filing or public compensation source reviewed describes a formal legacy-band structure or a post-merger harmonization program. Arista has made acquisitions, but any acquired-company title or pay integration is not publicly disclosed; public data support a single benchmarking architecture rather than separate inherited band systems.
- The peer mapping below is a market-equivalence guide, not an official cross-company leveling table.
Approximate peer-level mapping
| Arista level | Cisco / Juniper-type | Nvidia / product-company | Core distinction |
|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | Engineer I–II / early-career engineer | IC1–IC2 | Executes scoped work with close guidance |
| 3L | Engineer II–III | IC2–IC3 | Independently owns features or customer problems |
| 3H | Senior engineer / technical lead | IC3–IC4 | Leads complex features, designs or escalations |
| 4L | Staff / principal / technical leader | IC4–IC5 | Cross-team technical influence |
| 4H | Senior principal / architect | IC5 | Organization-level architecture |
| 5L | Distinguished / fellow-equivalent | IC6+ | Company-wide technical authority |
| M1 | First-line manager | M2–M3-type | People management plus delivery |
| M2 | Director | Director | Multi-team or functional ownership |
| M3 | VP / senior director | VP | Business-unit or regional leadership |
| M4 | SVP | SVP | Enterprise-wide function leadership |
Compensation by Band — Bangalore
Low / median / high annual estimates in INR, converted at 26 August 2026 planning FX. Values are reported anchors or modeled from Arista and local-market ratios — not an Arista salary schedule.
| Band | Title | Base | Variable | Total TC | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | Associate / Graduate Engineer 0–2 years | ₹15.0L – ₹20.0L | 6% | ₹22.0L ₹18.0L – ₹25.0L | RSU |
| 3L | Software / Systems Engineer 2–5 years | ₹26.0L – ₹33.0L | 8% | ₹42.0L ₹35.0L – ₹48.0L | RSU |
| 3H | Senior Engineer / Technical Lead 5–8 years | ₹33.0L – ₹42.0L | 10% | ₹71.0L ₹60.0L – ₹82.0L | RSU |
| 4L | Staff / Lead / Principal Engineer 8–12 years | ₹39.0L – ₹50.0L | 12% | ₹77.0L ₹66.0L – ₹89.0L | RSU |
| 4H | Senior Principal / Senior Architect 10–15 years | ₹42.0L – ₹54.0L | 15% | ₹84.0L ₹72.0L – ₹97.0L | RSU |
| 5L | Distinguished Engineer / Fellow-equivalent 14+ years | ₹53.0L – ₹67.0L | 20% | ₹1.10Cr ₹94.0L – ₹1.26Cr | RSU |
| M1 | Engineering / Functional Manager 7–12 years | ₹44.0L – ₹56.0L | 15% | ₹95.0L ₹81.0L – ₹1.09Cr | RSU |
| M2 | Senior Manager / Director 10–16 years | ₹57.0L – ₹73.0L | 20% | ₹1.35Cr ₹1.15Cr – ₹1.55Cr | RSU |
| M3 | Senior Director / Vice President 14–20 years | ₹79.0L – ₹1.01Cr | 30% | ₹2.20Cr ₹1.87Cr – ₹2.53Cr | RSU |
| M4 | Senior Vice President 18+ years | ₹1.23Cr – ₹1.57Cr | 45% | ₹4.00Cr ₹3.40Cr – ₹4.60Cr | RSU |
Total Compensation Range by Band
Total compensation in Bangalore: L2 through 5L on the technical track, M1 through M4 on the management track. Named-executive pay is filed separately and shown in the executive section.
Global Footprint & Pay Arbitrage
Arista does not disclose headcount by city. H-1B worksite records make Santa Clara the largest observed US visa worksite, while Arista’s own office descriptions establish Bangalore, Pune, Chennai, Burnaby, Dublin/Shannon, Sydney and several US cities as meaningful operating locations.
Verified footprint and data availability
| Location | Office status | Primary profile | Pay-data confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangalore · India | verified | Major R&D / engineering centre | high |
| Pune · India | verified | R&D / engineering centre | medium |
| Chennai · India | verified | R&D / engineering centre; pay data sparse | low |
| Santa Clara · United States | verified | Global HQ and principal R&D hub | high |
| San Francisco · United States | verified | Bay Area R&D | medium |
| Austin · United States | verified | R&D | medium |
| Nashua · United States | verified | R&D / engineering | medium |
| Cary · United States | verified | Engineering / support; compensation data sparse | low |
| Sydney · Australia | verified | Sales, systems engineering and customer-facing | medium |
| Melbourne · Australia | market-coverage | Market coverage; dedicated office not confirmed on Arista contact page | low |
| Burnaby / Vancouver · Canada | verified | R&D / engineering | high |
| Dublin · Ireland | verified | Engineering and regional operations | high |
| Shannon · Ireland | verified | Engineering / regional operations; pay data sparse | low |
| London · United Kingdom | market-coverage | Sales and customer-facing market; office/headcount not publicly confirmed | medium |
| Singapore · Singapore | verified | APAC administrative, sales and customer-facing | low |
| Tokyo · Japan | market-coverage | Japan sales/support market; exact office/headcount not publicly confirmed | low |
| Wellington · New Zealand | active-role | Active Arista sales-role evidence; office not established | low |
| Dubai / Middle East · United Arab Emirates | unverified | Coverage placeholder requested by component specification; no Arista office verified | none |
Cross-market median total compensation (USD)
| Band | Santa Clara | Bangalore | Pune | Sydney | London |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | $160.0K | $23.1K | $19.9K | $93.0K | $75.0K |
| 3L | $175.0K | $44.0K | $44.0K | $114.4K | $98.1K |
| 3H | $230.0K | $74.4K | $45.1K | $153.8K | $129.5K |
| 4L | $385.0K | $80.7K | $67.1K | $193.1K | $197.7K |
| 4H | $480.0K | $88.1K | $77.6K | $236.1K | $259.0K |
| 5L | $550.0K | $115.3K | $102.7K | $286.1K | $306.7K |
| M1 | $565.0K | $99.6K | $89.1K | $250.4K | $245.4K |
| M2 | $700.0K | $141.5K | $125.8K | $357.7K | $354.4K |
| M3 | $950.0K | $230.6K | $199.2K | $500.7K | $545.3K |
| M4 | $1.5M | $419.3K | $366.9K | $786.8K | $886.0K |
Median points used by the model, converted at 26 August 2026 planning FX. Nominal total-compensation comparisons, not purchasing-power parity or cost-to-company; a modeled value is not an official Arista band rate. Burnaby and Dublin appear in the multipliers below and in the location tables.
Equivalent-level location multipliers — Santa Clara median ÷ local median
| Band | vs Bangalore | vs Sydney | vs Burnaby | vs Dublin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | 6.9× | 1.7× | 1.8× | 2.5× |
| 3L | 4.0× | 1.5× | 1.5× | 2.0× |
| 3H | 3.1× | 1.5× | 1.4× | 1.8× |
| 4L | 4.8× | 2.0× | 1.8× | 1.9× |
| 4H | 5.5× | 2.0× | 1.6× | 2.1× |
| M1 | 5.7× | 2.3× | 1.8× | 2.4× |
| M2 | 4.9× | 2.0× | 1.7× | 2.0× |
Ratios are sensitive to stock-value snapshots, level matching and the limited observation count in smaller markets — useful for workforce-cost planning and offer normalization, not for asserting internal transfer ratios.
Source-grounded employee compensation anchors
| Market / level | Base | Stock | Bonus | Total | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States L2 | $119k | $19.1k | $6.2k | $144k | M1 |
| United States 3L | $120k | $36.0k | $7.6k | $164k | M1 |
| United States 3H | $144k | $57.4k | $9.5k | $211k | M1 |
| United States 4L | $147k | $120k | $9.5k | $277k | M1 |
| Bay Area L2 | $127k | $22.4k | $9.9k | $160k | M2 |
| Bay Area 3L | $128k | $37.3k | $10.2k | $176k | M2 |
| Bay Area 3H | $144k | $70.9k | $15.2k | $230k | M2 |
| Bay Area 4L | $160k | $206k | $18.5k | $384k | M2 |
| Bangalore L2 | ₹17.5L · $18.3k | ₹2.4L · $2.5k | ₹1.8L · $1.9k | ₹21.7L · $22.7k | M6 |
| Bangalore 3H | ₹37.2L · $39.0k | ₹29.3L · $30.7k | ₹4.4L · $4.6k | ₹70.9L · $74.3k | M6 |
| Australia L2 | A$98.2k · $70.2k | A$25.1k · $18.0k | A$4.7k · $3.4k | A$128k · $91.6k | M8 |
| Australia 4L | A$127k · $90.8k | A$123k · $88.0k | A$21.1k · $15.1k | A$271k · $193.8k | M8 |
| Canada 3L | C$110k · $79.5k | C$41.5k · $30.0k | C$11.5k · $8.3k | C$163k · $117.8k | M10 |
| Ireland 3L | €56.6k · $66.0k | €11.6k · $13.5k | €5.3k · $6.2k | €73.5k · $85.7k | M11 |
Annual review and off-cycle corrections
The Compensation Committee reviews named-executive salaries annually, generally establishes annual incentive goals in the first quarter and evaluates performance after fiscal year-end. A universal employee hike month or effective date is not publicly disclosed. No company-wide mid-year market-correction program was found in filings or official announcements; anonymous reviews describe inconsistent raise experiences, but they are anecdotal and cannot establish policy.
Variable Pay & Annual Incentive
Only the named-executive targets are filed. Employee targets below E1 are analytical benchmarks derived from reported bonus components and common product-company practice — not an Arista policy disclosure.
| Band | Target / planning rate | Payout mechanism | Recent payout |
|---|---|---|---|
L2 Associate / Graduate Engineer | 6% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
3L Software / Systems Engineer | 8% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
3H Senior Engineer / Technical Lead | 10% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
4L Staff / Lead / Principal Engineer | 12% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
4H Senior Principal / Senior Architect | 15% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
5L Distinguished Engineer / Fellow-equivalent | 20% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
M1 Engineering / Functional Manager | 15% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
M2 Senior Manager / Director | 20% modeled | Annual / company and individual performance; employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
M3 Senior Director / Vice President | 30% modeled | Annual; senior-leader plan likely equity-heavy; exact employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
M4 Senior Vice President | 45% modeled | Annual; senior-leader plan likely equity-heavy; exact employee formula not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
E1 Named executive other than CEO | 60% of base | Single annual payout; revenue and non-GAAP operating income fund the pool; committee discretion | 2025 actual varied by executive |
CEO Chief Executive Officer | 100% of base | Single annual payout; same corporate metrics plus individual assessment | 100% of target in 2025 |
Filed 2025 executive bonus design — two equally weighted corporate measures
The 2025 Employee Incentive Plan provided one annual payout after year-end. The committee also considered market diversification, product quality, innovation, support and individual performance. Overachievement could fund the pool above 100%, with negative discretion for margin, quality, non-cloud growth or customer-growth concerns.
Actual 2025 named-executive payouts
| Executive | Target basis | Target | Actual | Actual / target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayshree Ullal | 100% × $300k | $300.0K | $300.0K | 100% Full target |
| Chantelle Breithaupt | 60% × $330k | $198.0K | $250.0K | 126% Above stated target |
| Kenneth Duda | 60% × $300k | $180.0K | $300.0K | 167% Above stated target |
| Todd Nightingale | 60% × $350k full-year rate | $210.0K | $75.0K | 36% Partial-year service makes comparison imperfect |
| Marc Taxay | 60% × $315k annual rate | $189.0K | $0.0 | 0% Departed during 2025 |
Three-year CEO incentive history
CEO base salary was $300k in each year. The changing total is principally grant-date stock-award timing, not a change in fixed salary; the CEO’s base has remained $300,000 for more than a decade.
Employee-wide payout history and special incentives
Company-wide payout percentages for 2023–2025, sales-commission grids, spot-bonus amounts, deal incentives, patent awards, referral bonuses and project incentives are not publicly disclosed. Public job postings often say the role may be eligible for bonus and equity, but do not publish formulas. No formal pre-/post-merger variable-pay distinction was found.
Equity — RSU, PRSU, ESPP & Options
The Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (stockholder-approved 7 June 2024) is the active grant vehicle; RSUs are the principal broad award. The ESPP is employee-funded share purchase at 85% of the lower start/end price and should not be treated as a company-granted RSU.
The proxy’s equity-compensation-plan table reports 28,856,602 securities outstanding and 149,141,940 shares available for future issuance, the latter combining the Restated Plan and ESPP. A clean pool-utilization rate is not directly reconstructable because the Restated Plan includes recycled shares from prior awards and the ESPP has a separate reserve mechanism.
Pool utilization and burn diagnostics — 2025
Vesting mechanics — disclosed executive cadence
The broad plan allows multiple award structures; no single employee-wide schedule is disclosed. Executive award footnotes show a common 6.25% quarterly cadence — 25% per year over four years — while performance awards add a performance condition before service vesting. The schedule is an illustration of the disclosed executive cadence, not a promise for every employee.
Eligibility by hierarchy level
- The Restated Plan is broad enough to cover employees at all levels. Reported L2 packages include stock, so equity is not demonstrably restricted to senior grades.
- Arista does not disclose a minimum eligibility band, grant-value matrix, universal refresh cadence or country-specific award policy.
- The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to the CEO to grant equity to employees with corporate rank SVP or below, excluding Section 16 officers and executive direct reports, subject to the delegation’s conditions; awards become effective on the tenth business day specified in the policy.
- Executive grant decisions consider role, performance, retention, peer data and existing holdings; the CEO receives PRSUs in the disclosed program, while other NEOs receive a mix of RSUs and PRSUs.
Market-derived four-year grant equivalents — Bangalore
| Band | Annualized equity | Indicative 4-year grant | Shares at $189.48 |
|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | ₹3.3L | ₹13.0L ₹11.0L – ₹14.0L · $13.6K | ~72 |
| 3L | ₹10.3L | ₹41.0L ₹35.0L – ₹47.0L · $43.0K | ~227 |
| 3H | ₹30.0L | ₹1.20Cr ₹1.02Cr – ₹1.38Cr · $125.8K | ~664 |
| 4L | ₹27.5L | ₹1.10Cr ₹93.0L – ₹1.26Cr · $115.3K | ~609 |
| 4H | ₹29.3L | ₹1.17Cr ₹1.00Cr – ₹1.35Cr · $122.6K | ~647 |
| 5L | ₹38.0L | ₹1.52Cr ₹1.29Cr – ₹1.75Cr · $159.3K | ~841 |
| M1 | ₹37.5L | ₹1.50Cr ₹1.28Cr – ₹1.72Cr · $157.2K | ~830 |
| M2 | ₹57.0L | ₹2.28Cr ₹1.94Cr – ₹2.62Cr · $239.0K | ~1,261 |
| M3 | ₹1.03Cr | ₹4.12Cr ₹3.50Cr – ₹4.74Cr · $431.9K | ~2,279 |
| M4 | ₹1.97Cr | ₹7.88Cr ₹6.70Cr – ₹9.06Cr · $826.0K | ~4,359 |
Estimates convert the annual stock component implied by reported base, bonus and total compensation into a four-year grant-equivalent. They are useful for offer comparison but are not Arista grant guidelines. Share equivalents use the $189.48 ANET quote of 25 August 2026 and ignore plan valuation rules and PRSU performance.
Recent disclosed grant activity
| Date | Activity | Quantity / value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | RSUs granted company-wide | 10.7m shares; weighted grant-date fair value $103.34 | 10-K [P2] |
| 14 Feb 2025 | CFO and CTO disclosed annual awards | 21,600 RSUs and 21,600 PRSUs each in the outstanding-award schedule | Proxy [P1] |
| 9 May 2025 | CFO retention/performance awards | 31,080 RSUs and 31,080 PRSUs | Proxy [P1] |
| 11 Jul 2025 | Todd Nightingale new-hire awards | 466,060 RSUs plus 31,080 performance units | Proxy [P1] |
| 10 Oct 2025 | Executive awards | CFO 46,380 units; CTO 81,160 units | Proxy [P1] |
| 29 May 2026 | Annual director grants | 2,153 RSUs to each listed non-employee director | SEC Forms 4 [I1] |
RSUs and ESPP participation can be offered only where local legal, tax, securities and payroll arrangements permit. The filings do not disclose country-by-country participation rates, withholding methods or tax equalization, so India, Australia, Canada, Ireland, UK, Singapore and Japan equity administration details are not publicly disclosed.
Executive Compensation — 2025
2025 Summary Compensation Table values from the 2026 proxy are grant-date accounting values, not cash received. Jayshree Ullal is CEO and Chair; her $300,000 salary has been unchanged for more than a decade and her 2025 incentive target was 100% of base, paid at target.
“Compensation actually paid” warning
SEC pay-versus-performance rules produced 2025 CEO “compensation actually paid” of $26.19M. This is a fair-value adjustment to outstanding and vested equity, not cash received or a new grant. The comparable 2025 Summary Compensation Table total was $2.87M.
| FY | Median | CEO | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $189,124 | $15.6M | 82:1 |
| 2024 | $171,500 | $8.9M | 52:1 |
| 2025 | $190,815 | $2.9M | 15:1 |
The median fell 9.3% in 2024 and rose 11.3% in 2025. These figures include the SEC-defined annual-total-compensation elements — salary, actual incentive compensation and grant-date fair value of equity — not merely cash salary, so changes can reflect employee mix, geography, equity timing and the identity of the selected median employee, not just merit increases.
Arista’s fiscal 2025 compensation peer group: Akamai, Autodesk, Cadence, Ciena, CrowdStrike, Digital Realty, Equinix, Fortinet, Intuitive Surgical, NetApp, Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, Synopsys, Workday and Zscaler. AMD was added for fiscal 2026.
Arista’s 2025 CEO SCT total is unusually low relative to these selected peers because Ullal’s salary is deliberately low and the 2025 grant-date equity value was much smaller than in 2023–2024. Annual SCT comparisons are highly sensitive to grant timing; they should not be interpreted as realized wealth or total ownership economics.
Named Executive Officers & Board
2025 Summary Compensation Table totals for the five named executive officers, plus non-employee director pay. Non-CEO NEOs carried a 60% cash-incentive target; equity was 97.1% of aggregate NEO direct compensation excluding the departed general counsel.
Kenneth Duda also received a $1,000 cash bonus included in his filed total; the table places the remaining amount in the displayed categories. Nightingale’s $52.0M stock-award value was dominated by a one-time new-hire package and should not be treated as recurring annual compensation.
Non-employee director compensation — 2025
| Director | FY2025 total |
|---|---|
| Kelly Battles | $426,510 |
| Lewis Chew | $446,510 |
| Charles Giancarlo | $436,510 |
| Greg Lavender | $412,276 |
| Daniel Scheinman | $481,510 |
| Mark Templeton | $421,510 |
| Yvonne Wassenaar | $436,510 |
The 2025 cash structure included a $75,000 board retainer, a $120,000 lead-independent-director retainer, committee-chair retainers of $30,000 for Audit, $25,000 for Compensation and $12,000 for Nominating/Governance, plus committee-member retainers. The annual equity policy was revised to a $250,000 intended value, although 2025 grant-date values were roughly $336,500 because of timing and stock-price movement.
Current disclosed leadership and other officers
As of the 2026 proxy, the disclosed executive officers were Jayshree Ullal (CEO and Chair), Chantelle Breithaupt (SVP and CFO), Kenneth Duda (Founder, President and CTO) and Todd Nightingale (President and COO). Compensation for a CHRO, regional presidents, APAC head, EMEA head, company secretary or other non-NEO officers is not publicly disclosed.
Insider Filings — SEC Forms 4 and 144
Arista is a US-listed Delaware corporation, so BSE/NSE, SEBI SAST and promoter-group filing concepts do not apply. Sale aggregates can combine multiple execution prices; the displayed price is weighted or approximate.
| Date | Person | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-20 | Jayshree Ullal CEO & Chair | RSU vest 13,855 shares withheld for taxes | 27,664 | $186.45 | $5.2M |
| 2026-08-20 | Todd Nightingale President & COO | RSU vest 63,540 shares withheld for taxes; separate 10,360-unit award reported | 126,875 | $186.45 | $23.7M |
| 2026-08-20 | Kenneth Duda Founder, President & CTO | RSU vest 15,541 shares withheld for taxes | 52,507 | $186.45 | $9.8M |
| 2026-08-20 | Kenneth Duda Founder, President & CTO | Option exercise 3,999 shares at $14.15 and 13,334 at $15.28; weighted display price | 17,333 | $15.02 | $260.3K |
| 2026-08-20 | Chantelle Breithaupt SVP & CFO | RSU vest 6,145 shares withheld for taxes | 12,270 | $186.45 | $2.3M |
| 2026-08-05 | Jayshree Ullal CEO & Chair | Sale Aggregate of multiple price bands; Form 4 filed 7 Aug 2026 | 767,029 | $201.22 | $154.3M |
| 2026-08-03 | Charles Giancarlo Director | Sale Open-market sale | 8,000 | $181.02 | $1.4M |
| 2026-07-20 | Kenneth Duda Founder, President & CTO | Sale Form 4 period of report 20 Jul; filed 22 Jul | 43,333 | $170.51 | $7.4M |
| 2026-07-14 | Andreas Bechtolsheim Founder / Director emeritus-related insider | Sale 10b5-1 plan adopted 20 Feb 2026; Form 144 / Form 4 | 300,000 | $180.77 | $54.2M |
Reading guide
Benefits & Perks
Arista’s filings and careers pages disclose categories of benefits, but usually not provider names, insured sums, employer premium percentages, leave-day counts or local plan documents. Statutory minima are shown separately and must not be mistaken for enhanced Arista policy.
India
- Provident Fund. Contribution treatment in Arista India offer letters is not publicly disclosed. Statutory EPF is generally 12% employee and 12% employer on applicable wages, with part of the employer share funding EPS [G1].
- Gratuity. Arista policy beyond law not publicly disclosed. Statutory baseline is generally 15 days’ wages per completed year after qualifying service, commonly five years subject to exceptions [G2].
- Health insurance. Insurer, sum insured, family floater and parental coverage not publicly disclosed; employer market practice varies.
- Group life / accident. Not publicly disclosed; no Arista-specific amount found.
- Leave. Earned, sick, casual and carry-forward schedule not publicly disclosed; state shops-and-establishments rules vary.
- Maternity / paternity. Enhanced Arista policy not publicly disclosed. Statutory maternity leave can reach 26 weeks for eligible employees [G2]; no universal private-sector statutory paternity entitlement equivalent exists.
- Food, transport, phone/internet. Sodexo/meal card, cab, phone and internet reimbursements not publicly disclosed; offer/team specific.
- NPS, relocation, education. Employer NPS contribution, relocation allowance and tuition reimbursement not publicly disclosed; individual arrangements possible.
- Equity. Reported Bangalore packages include stock at L2 and above; local tax withholding and plan participation details not publicly disclosed [M6].
Global development, flexibility and wellbeing
- Flexibility. Remote or hybrid designation for some roles; flexible time-away and wellness programs [P2][P4].
- Wellbeing. Employee Assistance Programme / behavioral-health support; family-planning and backup-care support in the US [P2][P4].
- Learning. Technical learning, e-learning and the Arista Cloud Engineer (ACE) certification ecosystem [P4].
- Ownership. Employee participation in stock and bonus plans [P2].
- Pay equity. An annual third-party pay-equity assessment [P2].
- Not publicly disclosed. LinkedIn Learning, Udemy, Coursera, sabbaticals, formal rotational programs, certification-reimbursement limits and global internal-mobility guarantees were not found in the reviewed sources.
Evidence rule
Country legal baselines — superannuation, EPF, gratuity, statutory leave, CPF and pension rules — define floors or mandatory systems, not Arista benefits. Ask for employer cost versus employee deduction, waiting periods, dependent coverage, retirement vesting, leave classification, equity tax withholding and ESPP country availability in writing.
Performance Review & Pay Progression
The executive cycle is filed in the proxy; the employee rating system is not. Career-progression timings are an inferred architecture for planning, and promotion increases are not publicly disclosed for any transition.
Filed executive cycle
| Stage | Timing / mechanism | Public status |
|---|---|---|
| Set corporate goals | Typically first quarter | Disclosed for annual executive incentive plan [P1] |
| Salary review | Annual Compensation Committee review | Disclosed for NEOs [P1] |
| Performance measurement | After fiscal year-end | Disclosed for NEOs [P1] |
| Cash payout | Single annual payment after evaluation | Disclosed for 2025 NEO plan [P1] |
| Equity assessment | Role, performance, retention, peer data and holdings; PRSU outcomes based on performance conditions | Disclosed for NEOs [P1] |
Employee rating system — not publicly disclosed
Anonymous employee discussions describe uneven raise experiences, occasional absence of annual hikes and reliance on equity for retention. Those comments are useful sentiment signals but cannot establish a global policy or payout rate [M13].
Career-progression planning model
| Transition | Typical time in level | Scope signal |
|---|---|---|
| L2 → 3L | 1.5–3 | Expanded feature ownership; independent execution |
| 3L → 3H | 2–4 | Complex design ownership; mentoring; incident/escalation leadership |
| 3H → 4L | 3–5 | Cross-team technical scope; architecture impact |
| 4L → 4H | 3–6 | Organization-level technical influence |
| 4H → 5L | Highly selective | Company-wide technical authority |
| IC → M1 | Case specific | Sustained people leadership and delivery accountability |
| M1 → M2 | 3–5 | Multi-team leadership / director scope |
| M2 → M3 | Highly selective | Business-unit or regional accountability |
| M3 → M4 | Highly selective | Enterprise-wide function leadership |
Promotion increase: not publicly disclosed for every transition. Timings are an inferred career architecture, not Arista band progression data. Because stock can outweigh cash at senior levels, an employee’s annual total compensation can change substantially without a base-salary increase. Promotions may affect title, scope and future equity opportunity even when the immediate cash increase is modest. That is an inference from reported packages and the company’s equity-heavy executive philosophy, not a disclosed promotion policy.
Pay equity and governance
Arista states that it performs an annual third-party pay-equity assessment and uses compensation based on performance, contribution and impact. The proxy also says management and the Compensation Committee assess employee compensation risk at least annually. Detailed gender or ethnicity pay-gap results, adjustment budgets and country-level outcomes are not publicly disclosed [P1][P2].
H-1B / LCA Visa Footprint
A certified LCA is a wage filing, not proof of hiring or petition approval; the disclosed wage is base pay and excludes bonus, RSUs, ESPP value and most benefits. Counts from MyVisaJobs, salary statistics from H1BGrader, worksite percentiles from a small WARNTracker subset.
FY2024–FY2026 sponsor statistics
| Period | I-129 cases | Median · min–max | P75 | Average | Approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2026 to 18 Aug 121 LCAs | 81 approved / 1 denied | $148.5K $99.3K – $200.9K | $169.6K | $150.6K | 98.8% |
FY2025 204 LCAs | 129 approved / 5 denied | $136.0K $72.3K – $247.4K | NPD | $150.3K | 96.3% |
FY2024 144 certified; 3 denied/withdrawn | 131 approved / 4 denied | $120.7K NPD | NPD | $137.5K | 97.0% |
Worksite salary distributions — WARNTracker subset
| Worksite | Records | P25 | Median | P75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
California — all worksites FY2021–FY2026, all roles | 429 | $123.0K | $146.0K | $167.0K |
Nashua, NH FY2022–FY2026, Software Engineer only | 56 | $82.4K | $102.8K | $121.1K |
Santa Clara, CA FY2025–FY2026 recent 30-record subset | 19 | NPD | NPD | NPD |
Austin, TX FY2025–FY2026 recent 30-record subset | 3 | NPD | NPD | NPD |
Nashua, NH FY2025–FY2026 recent subset, all roles | 2 | NPD | NPD | NPD |
Cumulative worksite filing volumes — MyVisaJobs
Salary percentiles were not displayed for every city in the retrieved view, so they remain NPD rather than being inferred from averages.
Job-title mix — cumulative filings and recent-subset medians
Reading the data correctly
- A certified Labor Condition Application is a wage filing, not proof that a worker was hired or that a USCIS petition was approved. The disclosed wage is normally annual base pay and excludes bonus, RSUs, ESPP value and most benefits; LCA counts and Form I-129 case counts answer different questions.
- Cross-source discrepancy: H1BData’s FY2024 extraction contains 169 records with a $125,839 median, H1BGrader reports a FY2024 median of $120,735, and MyVisaJobs reports 144 certified LCAs plus three denied/withdrawn cases. The figures reflect distinct record universes and status/date rules and are retained rather than averaged.
- The H1BGrader median rises from $120,735 in FY2024 to $136,011 in FY2025 and $148,496 in FY2026 to date — a filing-mix signal, not necessarily a same-role annual raise, because titles, seniority and worksites change between years.
- A filing near $150,000 does not contradict a US software-engineer total-compensation package above $200,000, because equity and bonus are generally outside the LCA wage.
- California’s multi-year median in the WARNTracker subset is materially above the Nashua software-engineer median, but the scopes are not identical; the comparison is directional. The recent 30-record subset is a spot-check, not a replacement for the full DOL disclosure file.
- MyVisaJobs employer-level I-129 approval rates of 96.3%–98.8% are calculated from displayed approved and denied counts, not independently audited company metrics. Immigration status, nationality, individual identity and actual grant value cannot be inferred from aggregated filings.
Key Nuances & Insights
Reported total compensation — especially from Staff/Principal upward — rises much faster than base salary because stock is the dominant incremental component. Offer comparisons based only on base pay materially understate Arista packages.
Jayshree Ullal’s FY2025 total was $2.872M, below several other Arista NEOs, because her disclosed cash salary remained $300k and the annual equity value was modest relative to one-time/retention awards for other leaders.
Filings say employees participate in stock plans, and public entry-level packages include stock. Arista does not publish a minimum level, refresh matrix, grant target or country eligibility schedule.
At modeled equivalent levels, Santa Clara total compensation is commonly several times Bangalore total compensation in USD. The gap narrows on purchasing power but remains material in nominal cost, especially at senior equity-heavy levels.
L2, 3L/3H, 4L/4H and 5L appear in employee-reported datasets and recruiting evidence, but this report does not claim they are a complete internal HR grade dictionary. Leadership titles are mapped separately.
Arista’s India centres are engineering/R&D locations, not a traditional offshore delivery bench. An IT-services “onsite allowance” framework should not be assumed; relocation, travel and assignment premiums remain individual and undisclosed.
Share equivalents divide estimated grant value by a $189.48 reference price. Actual grants are approved on specific dates, use plan valuation rules and can change materially with ANET volatility.
The 104.1m-share ESPP reserve is authorization capacity, not outstanding employee ownership or expected dilution. Actual FY2025 issuance was 0.7m shares.
Public packages combine current stock value, new-hire grants and refreshers inconsistently. Arista does not publish standard refresh timing, so annualized equity comparisons are indicative rather than contractual.
Levels.fyi skews toward technical and equity-aware employees; Glassdoor and Indeed can mix years, roles and cash/total-pay concepts. Sparse-country figures are left undisclosed instead of being extrapolated without a defensible anchor.
No source reviewed provides matched employee cohorts, internal-promotion pay or lateral-hire premiums. Anecdotal claims would not support a quantified gap.
Arista states that it works with a third party annually to identify and resolve pay gaps, and recent employee surveys reported very high fairness scores. Adjusted pay-gap percentages by gender or ethnicity are not disclosed.
Superannuation, EPF, gratuity, statutory leave, CPF and pension rules define floors or mandatory systems. They must not be presented as company-enhanced benefits unless Arista publishes a local policy.
The last explicit plan-level filing states a 100% match up to 3% of annual salary with immediate vesting. The FY2025 10-K does not restate that formula, so it is labeled last-explicitly-disclosed rather than guaranteed current policy.
A verified office does not guarantee enough compensation observations for a salary table. Chennai and Shannon use transparent modeled relationships; Singapore, Tokyo, Wellington and Dubai/MEA remain NPD where Arista-specific evidence is insufficient.
Todd Nightingale’s FY2025 total included more than $52M of stock-award grant-date value associated with joining and retention. That does not mean annual recurring cash or realized pay was $52M.
Peer-positioning conclusion
Arista’s employee proposition resembles a high-growth Silicon Valley product company: competitive cash, potentially material equity, a broad ESPP and substantial stock-based-compensation expense. The trade-off is that realized wealth is more volatile than a cash-heavy package, and public transparency declines sharply outside the United States, India, Canada, Ireland and Australia.
Evidence classes used in this report
| Label | Meaning | Permitted use |
|---|---|---|
| Filed / official | SEC filing, company release, official careers/office page or government rule | State as disclosed, with date and scope |
| Reported market data | Salary portal, visa database or employee-submitted package | State as reported; do not call it company policy |
| Modeled planning estimate | Transparent interpolation, multiplier or corridor based on cited anchors | Use for benchmarking only; label as modeled |
| Not publicly disclosed (NPD) | No defensible public source located, or evidence too sparse/conflicting | Leave blank / show NPD; do not guess |
Data-quality and conflict log
| Topic | Observed conflict / limitation | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 H-1B volume / median | H1BData: 169 records, median $125,839; H1BGrader: median $120,735; MyVisaJobs: 144 certified plus 3 denied/withdrawn | Retain all figures with dataset scope; do not average them [H2][H3][H4] |
| Employee band labels | Market pages expose L2/3L/3H/4L/4H/5L; filings do not publish a universal HR-grade map | Treat hierarchy as inferred, not official [M1][M6][P1][P2] |
| Equity eligibility | Market packages show equity at junior levels; filings disclose plan eligibility but not standard grant grids | Show market evidence and mark thresholds/grant cadence NPD [M1][M6][P2] |
| 401(k) formula | FY2023 10-K explicitly states 100% match up to 3%; FY2025 filing does not restate the formula | Cite last explicit disclosure and do not assert current continuity [P7][P2] |
| Location footprint | Official global-office list confirms multiple sites; some salary portals list markets without an official office confirmation | Separate verified office, active-job evidence and market-only coverage [O1][P4] |
| Salary ranges | Most sources publish medians or user submissions, not company bands or percentiles | Use explicit modeled corridors around cited anchors [M1]–[M12] |
Not-publicly-disclosed inventory
| Requested item | Finding |
|---|---|
| Employee-wide attrition | No company-wide rate located in reviewed filings or official releases. |
| Official global band / grade architecture | Arista does not publicly map all roles to L2/3L/3H/4L/4H/5L or management grades. |
| Salary matrix by country and level | No official matrix located; report tables are market anchors and models. |
| Employee bonus target and payout history by band | Only named-executive incentive terms and outcomes are filed. |
| Minimum level for RSU eligibility | Plan eligibility is broad, but standardized operational thresholds are not published. |
| Refresh grant cadence and grant-size grid | Individual packages exist; no global company grid is disclosed. |
| Performance rating labels / forced distribution | No official employee rating scale, bell curve or calibration allocation located. |
| Annual merit and promotion calendar | No global month/effective-date schedule located. |
| Typical promotion time and promotion increase | No official band progression data located. |
| Provider-level health coverage and insured sums | Official pages disclose benefit categories, not all local plan details. |
| Regional-head compensation | Not separately disclosed unless the executive is a named executive officer. |
| Country/city headcount | Only global employee totals are filed; city counts were not located. |
| Singapore, Tokyo, Wellington and Middle East salary bands | Insufficient public evidence for a defensible full matrix. |
| Dubai office | No verified Arista office confirmation located in the official global-office list reviewed. |
FX rates used — 1 USD equals, planning rates as of 2026-08-26
Rates are rounded planning rates for comparability, not payroll or tax conversion. Compensation intelligence, not an offer, tax, immigration, accounting or legal opinion.
Source register — 41 sources
| P1 | Arista Networks 2026 Proxy Statement, filed 16 April 2026 — executive and director compensation, CEO pay ratio, equity-plan table, governance. |
| P2 | Arista Networks Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2025 — human capital and Note 6, Stock Plans. |
| P3 | Arista Networks Q2 2026 financial results, 4 August 2026; Q1 2026 and FY2025 earnings releases. |
| P4 | Arista Networks official Contact, Careers and Benefits/Perks pages, accessed 26 August 2026. |
| P5 | ANET market data, 25 August 2026 quote: $189.48 per share. |
| P6 | Arista Networks 2024 Proxy Statement, filed 24 April 2024 — FY2023 median employee compensation and CEO pay ratio. |
| P7 | Arista Networks Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2023 — last explicit U.S. 401(k) match disclosure. |
| M1 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — United States, August 2026. |
| M2 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — San Francisco Bay Area, August 2026. |
| M3 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineering Manager — United States / Bay Area, August 2026. |
| M4 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — Austin, August 2026. |
| M5 | Glassdoor, Arista Networks salaries in New Hampshire, August 2026. |
| M6 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — India and Bangalore, August 2026. |
| M7 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — Pune, August 2026. |
| M8 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Software Engineer — Australia, August 2026. |
| M9 | Glassdoor and Indeed, Arista Networks Australia role estimates, August 2026. |
| M10 | Levels.fyi and Glassdoor, Arista Networks Canada / Vancouver compensation, August 2026. |
| M11 | Levels.fyi, Arista Networks Ireland / Dublin compensation, August 2026. |
| M12 | Glassdoor, Arista Networks United Kingdom / London role estimates, August 2026. |
| M13 | Blind, Glassdoor, Fishbowl and Taro employee discussions/reviews — anecdotal only, August 2026. |
| O1 | Arista Networks official global-office list — Santa Clara, Austin, Nashua, Cary, San Francisco, Burnaby, Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Sydney, Dublin, Shannon, Singapore, Korea and Golden. |
| H1 | US Department of Labor OFLC public disclosure data documentation and FY2026 disclosure releases. |
| H2 | H1BData.info, Arista Networks FY2024 salary records. |
| H3 | MyVisaJobs, Arista Networks LCA and I-129 case statistics, through 18 August 2026. |
| H4 | H1BGrader, Arista Networks FY2024–FY2026 salary statistics, August 2026. |
| H5 | WARNTracker public H-1B salary subset and worksite percentiles, August 2026; small sample. |
| I1 | SEC Forms 4 and 144 for Arista insiders, July–August 2026; transaction aggregates cross-checked against filing indexes. |
| C1 | Ciena 2026 proxy statement, fiscal 2025 CEO compensation. |
| C2 | Akamai 2026 proxy statement, fiscal 2025 CEO compensation. |
| C3 | Fortinet 2026 proxy statement, fiscal 2025 CEO compensation. |
| C4 | Palo Alto Networks 2025 proxy statement, fiscal 2025 CEO compensation. |
| G1 | Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, India — contribution-rate guidance. |
| G2 | Government of India labour-law handbook — statutory maternity and gratuity guidance. |
| G3 | Australian Taxation Office — Super Guarantee 12% from 1 July 2025. |
| G4 | Fair Work Ombudsman — annual leave and personal/carer’s leave entitlements. |
| G5 | UK Government — statutory paid holiday and workplace-pension minimum contributions. |
| G6 | Ireland Workplace Relations Commission / Citizens Information — annual leave and statutory sick leave. |
| G7 | Singapore Ministry of Manpower / CPF Board — leave, sick leave and CPF eligibility. |
| G8 | Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / Japan Pension Service — paid leave and social insurance. |
| G9 | Province of British Columbia — annual vacation and illness/injury leave. |
| FX1 | 26 August 2026 exchange-rate set: INR market close, Bank of Canada, ECB, market references for GBP/AUD/SGD/JPY, RBNZ 25 August release and the CBUAE fixed peg; rounded for presentation. |
Recent News & Workforce Trend
Compensation, workforce and governance timeline from SEC filings, Arista investor releases and official pages, with the headcount series and the items investigated but not publicly established.
Arista added 1,503 full-time employees from 2022 to 2025, a compound annual growth rate of approximately 12.3%. The company does not publish quarterly headcount, city-level headcount, an employee-wide voluntary-attrition rate or an “IT services attrition” measure; as a networking product company, an IT-services attrition comparator would be conceptually weak [P2].
Q3 guidance was approximately $3.3B. No broad compensation-cycle announcement accompanied the release.
Disclosed FY2025 CEO total compensation of $2.872M, a 15:1 pay ratio, and the current executive incentive/equity design.
Revenue reached $9.006B, up 28.6%; full-time headcount reached 5,115. The filing does not translate that growth into a company-wide salary-hike percentage.
The role change affects the named-executive population and future leadership-pay comparisons.
His disclosed 2025 compensation was heavily influenced by new-hire equity.
Stockholders approved the amended, restated and extended plan; it removed the prior evergreen feature and extended the plan term.
Items specifically investigated but not publicly established
| Requested item | Research conclusion, 26 Aug 2026 | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Company-wide FY2025/FY2026 salary-hike announcement | No official percentage or effective date was located. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Annual employee compensation-review month | Executive salaries are reviewed annually, but the employee-wide calendar is not filed. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Mid-year correction / market-adjustment program | No program located. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Broad pay freeze or company-wide salary cut | No such program was disclosed in reviewed filings or official releases; not proof that no individual/team action occurred. | None disclosed |
| Company-wide restructuring or mass-layoff program | No company-wide program was disclosed; isolated role changes or ordinary workforce management cannot be ruled out. | None disclosed |
| Employee-wide variable-payout percentages, last three years | Only named-executive terms and outcomes are filed. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Employee attrition rate | No company-wide rate located. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Campus-offer revision, delayed joining or fresher-pay change | No disclosure located. | Not publicly disclosed |