APA Corporation
Compensation Insight

How APA Corporation Pays

APA's T0 to T9 professional research tiers and M1 through CEO leadership layers, priced across 13 markets alongside restricted stock units, stock options and 0 to 200 percent performance awards, a $13.20M CEO package at 56:1, and a single 2025 H-1B filing at $112,500.

1,791 employees · Nasdaq: APA · APA Corporation · Holding company since 2021 · Houston, Texas · FY ends 31 December
Employees
1,791
Full-time equivalents at 31 December 2025: 1,061 in the United States, 486 in the United Kingdom, 242 in Egypt, 2 in France and none reported in Suriname.
Headcount change
-22.3%
Down from 2,305 full-time equivalents at 31 December 2024. This is a workforce-size change, not a disclosed attrition rate.
FY2025 revenue
$8.92B
Of which about $7.229 billion came from oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production revenue.
CEO total pay
$13.20M
John J. Christmann IV's 2025 Summary Compensation Table total, of which $7.92 million was stock and option awards at grant-date value.
CEO pay ratio
56:1
Measured against a median employee total compensation of $237,527 for 2025, one of the lowest ratios among large-cap United States energy issuers.
Median employee pay
$237,527
The proxy median covers the global workforce, so it blends United States, United Kingdom and Egypt pay and includes equity value.
2025 incentive payout
189.8%
The corporate scorecard result for the executive annual incentive plan. Riney and Rodgers reached 200 percent after a 105.4 percent individual factor.
H-1B filings in 2025
1
A single certified labour condition application, for a Network Administration Analyst II in Houston at $112,500. MyVisaJobs reported no FY2026 petition activity as of 19 May 2026.
Locations
United States
United Kingdom
Egypt
Suriname
France
India
Australia
New Zealand
Singapore
1.00× base / 1.00× TC vs Houston

Band Hierarchy

APA states in its sustainability reporting that it has established pay bands for all positions rooted in labour-market data, and that annual compensation changes consider an employee's pay range, performance rating and location. It publishes none of the band names, grade codes, minima, midpoints or maxima. The T0 to T9 and M1 to M2 tiers below are a research taxonomy built from observed Apache Corporation title families, not an APA-authenticated grade map. Only the vice president, senior vice president, executive vice president, president, chief executive and non-employee director tiers are titles APA itself names.

Individual contributor ladder — research tiers T0 through T9

T9
Advisor / PrincipalIC · variable 18% · modeled
Advisor, principal engineer, principal geoscientist and technical authority
T8
Reservoir EngineerIC · variable 18% · reported
Reservoir engineer, reserves engineer and asset performance engineer
T7
Drilling EngineerIC · variable 17% · reported
Drilling engineer, completions engineer and well-delivery specialist
T6
Geologist / Subsurface SpecialistIC · variable 16% · reported
Development geologist, exploration geologist and geophysicist
T5
Engineer / GeoscientistIC · variable 15% · reported
Production engineer, facilities engineer, geoscientist and petrophysicist
T4
Senior ProfessionalIC · variable 13% · reported
Senior accountant, senior analyst and senior corporate specialist
T3
AnalystIC · variable 12% · reported
Business, commercial, planning and reservoir data analyst
T2
ProfessionalIC · variable 11% · reported
Accountant, financial analyst, land and regulatory professional
T1
Entry ProfessionalIC · variable 8% · reported
Accountant I, Analyst I, Engineer I and equivalent early-career roles
T0
InternIC · reported
Engineering, geoscience, finance and corporate summer intern

Management ladder — M1 supervisor through M2 director

M2
DirectorManagement · variable 25% · modeled
Functional director, asset director and corporate department leader
M1
Supervisor / ManagerManagement · variable 20% · modeled
First-line supervisor, asset team manager and functional manager

Executive and board — VP through Board

Board
Non-employee DirectorBoard · verified
Board and committee service under chair Lamar McKay
CEO
Chief Executive OfficerExecutive · variable 140% · verified
John J. Christmann IV, Chief Executive Officer
Pres
PresidentExecutive · variable 120% · verified
Stephen J. Riney, President and principal financial officer of record until 2025
EVP
Executive Vice PresidentExecutive · variable 100% · verified
Chief Financial Officer, Exploration, Administration and Chief Legal Officer
SVP
Senior Vice PresidentExecutive · variable 75% · modeled
Scott Grandt, Jessica Jackson, Castlen Kennedy and Greg McDaniel lead US assets, EH and S, human resources and international assets
VP
Vice PresidentLeadership · variable 60% · modeled
Function or asset vice president such as David Bernal, Aneil Kochar or Mandeep Walia

Disclosed executive layer

Chief Executive Officer
John J. Christmann IV
Fully disclosed in the proxy statement including salary, annual incentive, long-term incentive target, all other compensation and the pay ratio.
President
Stephen J. Riney
Named executive officer with a full Summary Compensation Table row, a 120 percent incentive target and a $5.4 million 2025 long-term incentive target.
Executive Vice Presidents
Ben C. Rodgers as Chief Financial Officer, Tracey K. Henderson in Exploration, Mark D. Maddox in Administration and Kimberly O. Warnica as Chief Legal Officer
Only those who qualify as named executives appear in the compensation tables. Maddox does not, so his pay is visible only through Section 16 filings such as the 6 January 2026 grant.
Senior Vice Presidents
Scott R. Grandt, Jessica M. Jackson, Castlen M. Kennedy and Greg McDaniel
No compensation table exists for this layer. The stock ownership requirement of two and a half times base salary is the only quantified disclosure.
Vice Presidents
David J. Bernal, Aneil Kochar, Donald Martin, Robert P. Rayphole, Mandeep Walia and Anthony White
Named on the leadership page with a two times base salary ownership requirement, but no pay disclosure of any kind.
VerifiedOnly the executive vice president, president, chief executive and non-employee director rows carry a company disclosure. The vice president and senior vice president rows are modeled from ownership requirements and the surrounding tiers, and everything below is reconstructed from public salary records.

Track divergence

T0 to T4
Cash dominates. The observed Houston packages at these tiers run roughly 81 to 87 percent base, with a small bonus and a small annualized stock component consistent with the proxy statement that essentially all employees participate in equity.
T5 to T8
The technical disciplines separate sharply from the corporate ones. A drilling or reservoir engineer prices about 65 percent above a senior accountant in the same city, and the Reservoir Engineer role page shows stock at about 14 percent and bonus at about 13 percent of the total.
T9 and M1
The technical authority and first-line management paths converge in the same pay zone, so the choice is scope rather than money. Neither tier carries a public APA observation, so both are modeled.
M2 and above
The two ladders merge into the officer tier, where the stock ownership requirements take over as the visible structure: two times base salary at vice president, two and a half at senior vice president, three at executive vice president, four at president and ten at chief executive.

Hierarchy qualifications and legacy structures

  • APA Corporation is the Nasdaq-listed holding company created in 2021, and Apache Corporation is the subsidiary that employs the workforce. Third-party salary records filed under Apache are therefore the right records for APA employees.
  • The 2024 Callon Petroleum acquisition changed leadership and organisation, but no public filing provides a harmonised pre-merger and post-merger grade map or any evidence of inherited Callon band codes.
  • No peer-level crosswalk to Chevron, EOG, Occidental or Devon internal grades is possible, because none of those companies publishes a grade system either. Any such mapping would be speculation.
  • The research tiers are strongest for the Houston corporate and subsurface title families that carry the largest Glassdoor samples, and weakest for field, offshore and international roles.
  • The non-employee director row is a governance package, not an employment band, and is excluded from the range chart along with the senior vice president and named executive rows.

Peer-level mapping

BandArchetypePeer mappingCaveat
T0InternChevron, EOG, Occidental and Devon intern programmesNo peer grade crosswalk exists because none of these companies publish internal grade systems.Glassdoor Apache Houston intern estimate, six submissions, annualized from the displayed low of $45,000 and high of $83,000.
T1Entry ProfessionalEntry professional roles at independent exploration and production peersAPA does not publish band codes, experience ranges or a title-to-grade map, so this tier is analytical.Glassdoor Apache Houston Accountant I estimate, eight submissions, $61,000 to $81,000 with a $71,000 midpoint.
T2ProfessionalProfessional corporate roles at independent exploration and production peersAPA does not publish band codes, experience ranges or a title-to-grade map, so this tier is analytical.Glassdoor Apache Houston Accountant estimate, fourteen submissions, $78,000 to $124,000 with a $101,000 midpoint.
T3AnalystAnalyst roles at independent exploration and production peersAPA does not publish band codes, experience ranges or a title-to-grade map, so this tier is analytical.Glassdoor Apache Houston Analyst estimate, twelve submissions, $90,000 to $146,000 with a $118,000 midpoint.
T4Senior ProfessionalSenior professional corporate roles at exploration and production peersAPA does not publish band codes, experience ranges or a title-to-grade map, so this tier is analytical.Glassdoor Apache Houston Senior Accountant estimate, six submissions, $103,000 to $147,000 with a $125,000 midpoint.
T5Engineer / GeoscientistTechnical engineering roles at independent exploration and production peersThe Glassdoor Engineer page mixes discipline and seniority, so this row is broader than a single internal band.Glassdoor Apache Houston Engineer estimate, eleven submissions, $125,000 to $198,000 with a $161,500 midpoint.
T6Geologist / Subsurface SpecialistSubsurface specialist roles at independent exploration and production peersAPA does not publish band codes, experience ranges or a title-to-grade map, so this tier is analytical.Glassdoor Apache Houston Geologist estimate, twelve submissions, $142,000 to $241,000 with a $191,500 midpoint.
T7Drilling EngineerWell construction roles at independent exploration and production peersWell-delivery roles price above general engineering in the same dataset because of rig-schedule demands.Glassdoor Apache Houston Drilling Engineer estimate, twelve submissions, $155,000 to $260,000 with a $207,500 midpoint.
T8Reservoir EngineerReservoir engineering roles at independent exploration and production peersThe Apache Houston role page reports a $208,000 total median while the broader title table shows a $223,500 midpoint; this row uses the role page because it splits base, bonus and stock.Glassdoor Apache Reservoir Engineer Houston role page, seventeen submissions: $151,000 base median, $27,000 bonus median and $30,000 stock median.
T9Advisor / PrincipalTechnical authority roles at independent exploration and production peersNo Houston observation exists for this tier. The only public principal-level record is a single low-confidence Aberdeen Principal Subsea Engineer submission at roughly £164,000 to £192,000 total pay, so the anchor row is modeled.
M1Supervisor / ManagerFront-line management at independent exploration and production peersAPA discloses no manager pay range and no manager bonus target, so this row bridges the senior individual contributor observations and the director tier.
M2DirectorDirector layer at independent exploration and production peersThis is an employee director tier and must not be confused with the non-employee board directors, whose pay is a separate governance package.
VPVice PresidentVice president layer at independent exploration and production peersAPA publishes no vice president compensation table. The only hard signal is the stock ownership requirement of two times base salary, so this row is modeled between the director tier and the named executives.
SVPSenior Vice PresidentSenior vice president layer at independent exploration and production peersNone of APA's senior vice presidents qualified as named executives for 2025, so no compensation table exists. The stock ownership requirement of two and a half times base salary is the only disclosed anchor.
EVPExecutive Vice PresidentNamed executive officers at EOG, Occidental, Devon and DiamondbackAn average of the three serving named executive vice presidents for 2025. Warnica's $500,000 sign-on bonus is inside the cash figure, so the average overstates a steady-state EVP package.Average of Ben Rodgers, Tracey Henderson and Kimberly Warnica in the 2026 proxy Summary Compensation Table.
PresPresidentPresident or chief operating officer layer at large independent producers2025 Summary Compensation Table value at grant-date accounting value for equity, not cash received.2026 proxy Summary Compensation Table; the cash figure combines the $2,049,840 non-equity incentive with the $110,160 discretionary amount reported in the bonus column.
CEOChief Executive OfficerEOG, Occidental, Devon and Diamondback chief executivesGrant-date accounting value for equity, which is not realized pay. The 2025 long-term incentive target was $9.49 million against $7.92 million of reported stock and option awards.2026 proxy Summary Compensation Table: $1,300,000 salary, $3,454,360 non-equity incentive, $6,018,436 stock awards, $1,897,996 option awards and $531,725 of all other compensation.
BoardNon-employee DirectorLarge-cap United States energy boardsA governance package rather than an employment band. The non-executive chair receives an additional $100,000 of cash and $100,000 of restricted stock units on top of these amounts.2026 proxy director compensation policy: a $100,000 annual cash retainer and a $200,000 annual restricted stock unit grant, with no meeting attendance fees.

Critical evidence warning

APA Corporation publishes no band identifiers, no salary minima, midpoints or maxima, no experience ranges by band, no target bonus percentages below the executive layer and no equity grant matrix. Every non-executive figure in this report is a third-party employee-submitted observation or a calibrated model around one, and should be used for orientation rather than quoted as an APA pay band.


Compensation by Band — Houston

Low / median / high annual values at 1.00× base and 1.00× total-compensation factors versus Houston. Total equals base plus bonus plus annualized equity.

BandTitleBaseVariableTotal TCEquity
T0
Intern
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$54K$74K
$64K
$54K$74K
T1
Entry Professional
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$53K$71K8%
$71K
$60K$82K
$4K
T2
Professional
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$72K$98K11%
$101K
$86K$116K
$7K
T3
Analyst
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$82K$112K12%
$118K
$100K$136K
$9K
T4
Senior Professional
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$86K$116K13%
$125K
$106K$144K
$11K
T5
Engineer / Geoscientist
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$108K$146K15%
$162K
$137K$186K
$16K
T6
Geologist / Subsurface Specialist
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$125K$169K16%
$192K
$163K$220K
$21K
T7
Drilling Engineer
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$133K$179K17%
$208K
$176K$239K
$25K
T8
Reservoir Engineer
Not publicly disclosed · reported
$128K$174K18%
$208K
$177K$239K
$30K
T9
Advisor / Principal
Not publicly disclosed · modeled
$157K$213K18%
$255K
$217K$293K
$37K
M1
Supervisor / Manager
Not publicly disclosed · modeled
$149K$201K20%
$245K
$208K$282K
$35K
M2
Director
Not publicly disclosed · modeled
$200K$270K25%
$360K
$306K$414K
$66K
VP
Vice President
Not publicly disclosed · modeled
$255K$345K60%
$700K
$595K$805K
$220K
SVP
Senior Vice President
Not publicly disclosed · modeled
$340K$460K75%
$1.30M
$1.10M$1.50M
$600K
EVP
Executive Vice President
Not publicly disclosed · verified
$513K$695K100%
$3.68M
$3.13M$4.23M
$1.62M
Pres
President
Not publicly disclosed · verified
$765K$1.03M120%
$7.91M
$6.72M$9.09M
$4.50M
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
Not publicly disclosed · verified
$1.10M$1.50M140%
$13.20M
$11.22M$15.18M
$7.92M
Board
Non-employee Director
Senior executive or board background · verified
$85K$115K
$300K
$255K$345K
$200K
Year-end 2025 office named in the Form 10-K · 9 reported band cellsReportedModeledVerifiedBase and total use a plus or minus 15 percent planning envelope around the observed midpoint; equity uses plus or minus 25 percent. The underlying Glassdoor low and high estimates are wider than this envelope on several rows.

Total Compensation Range by Band

Total compensation in Houston across the employee bands. Proxy-disclosed executive cohorts are excluded so the employee bands stay readable.

T0$54K$74KT1$60K$82KT2$86K$116KT3$100K$136KT4$106K$144KT5$137K$186KT6$163K$220KT7$176K$239KT8$177K$239KT9$217K$293KM1$208K$282KM2$306K$414KVP$595K$805K$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$1.00M

Global Footprint & Pay Arbitrage

APA reported 1,791 full-time equivalents at 31 December 2025, down 22.3 percent from 2,305 a year earlier, concentrated in the United States, the United Kingdom and Egypt. Houston is the pay anchor and the only market with a substantial public salary sample. Aberdeen has a sparse but employer-specific sample, Cairo has none, and the India, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore records are retained as explicit research gaps rather than as verified APA offices.

1,791
Full-time equivalents at 31 December 2025
59 / 27 / 14
United States, United Kingdom and Egypt share of workforce
13
Markets modelled in this report
4
Offices named in the 2025 Form 10-K

Office and market catalogue — calibration factors versus Houston

LocationLikely office profilePresenceBaseTC
Houston
United States · USD
Headquarters, corporate functions, subsurface, engineering and executive centreYear-end 2025 office named in the Form 10-K1.00×1.00×
Midland
United States · USD
Permian Basin operations, drilling, completions and field supportYear-end 2025 office named in the Form 10-K0.92×0.88×
San Antonio
United States · USD
Historical technical and specialist worksite in the visa recordFour historical certified labour condition applications, no current office listed0.82×0.80×
Tulsa
United States · USD
Requested comparison market with no verified APA employee populationNot listed as a year-end 2025 office; retained as an explicit research gap0.85×0.82×
Anchorage
United States · USD
Alaska exploration interest with no reported employee officeExploration interest disclosed in the Form 10-K, no year-end office1.00×0.95×
Aberdeen
United Kingdom · GBP
North Sea operations, offshore technical, safety, supply chain and support rolesYear-end 2025 office named in the Form 10-K0.88×0.94×
Cairo
Egypt · EGP
Egypt concession operations, subsurface, drilling and country support functionsYear-end 2025 office named in the Form 10-K0.28×0.24×
Paramaribo
Suriname · USD
Suriname Block 58 development, exploration and appraisal project exposureActive project area with zero direct full-time equivalents reported for 20250.85×0.80×
France (city not disclosed)
France · EUR
Two reported full-time equivalents supporting European corporate activityCountry full-time equivalents disclosed, city not named in the Form 10-K0.62×0.55×
Bangalore
India · INR
Requested comparison market with no verified APA employee populationNo India employee presence reported in the 2025 Form 10-K0.18×0.15×
Sydney
Australia · AUD
Requested comparison market; APA Corporation is unrelated to APA Group on the ASXNo Australia employee presence reported in the 2025 Form 10-K0.78×0.72×
Auckland
New Zealand · NZD
Requested comparison market with no verified APA employee populationNo New Zealand employee presence reported in the 2025 Form 10-K0.62×0.57×
Singapore
Singapore · SGD
Requested comparison market with no verified APA employee populationNo Singapore employee presence reported in the 2025 Form 10-K0.70×0.65×

APA's 2025 Form 10-K names Houston, Midland, Cairo and Aberdeen as its year-end offices and reports full-time equivalents by country rather than by city, so this catalogue cannot rank offices by headcount. Tulsa, which appeared in the original research brief, is not a listed year-end office and is retained here only as a comparison market.

Houston anchor medians — the basis of every modeled cell

BandBaseStockBonusOtherTotal
T0$64K$0$0$64K
T1$62K$4K$5K$71K
T2$85K$7K$9K$101K
T3$97K$9K$12K$118K
T4$101K$11K$13K$125K
T5$127K$16K$19K$162K
T6$147K$21K$24K$192K
T7$156K$25K$27K$208K
T8$151K$30K$27K$208K
EVP$604K$1.62M$1.30M$160K$3.68M
Pres$900K$4.50M$2.16M$340K$7.91M
CEO$1.30M$7.92M$3.45M$532K$13.20M
Board$100K$200K$0$300K
  • The Houston column is the anchor. T0 through T8 come from Glassdoor Apache Houston title estimates with samples of six to fourteen submissions each; T9, M1, M2, VP and SVP are modeled because no Houston observation exists for those tiers.
  • The Reservoir Engineer role page is the single most useful record in the whole dataset because it splits a $208,000 total median into a $151,000 base median, a $27,000 bonus median and a $30,000 stock median. That 73 / 13 / 14 split is what sets the base, bonus and equity mix used across the technical tiers.
  • Aberdeen is calibrated from ten employer-specific Glassdoor North Sea titles whose midpoints average about $132,000 against a Houston title average of about $140,000. The sample skews towards senior offshore technical roles, so the total factor of 0.94 is flattering to junior Aberdeen roles.
  • San Antonio is calibrated from the visa record rather than salary records: four historical certified applications average $103,750 against $126,805 for the four Houston applications, a ratio of 0.82.
  • Cairo, Paramaribo, France and the four unverified comparison markets carry no company-specific salary evidence at all. Their factors are planning envelopes only and are recorded in the known gaps rather than presented as observations.
  • The executive vice president, president and chief executive rows are proxy disclosures converted for comparison. They are global executive values, not a local pay range in any selected city.

Model rules

  • Every modeled cell is the Houston observation multiplied by the city base or total factor and then by the 25 August 2026 foreign-exchange snapshot.
  • A total compensation cell is base plus target bonus plus annualized equity. Sign-on payments, relocation, offshore allowances and one-time retention awards are excluded.
  • Base and total carry separate factors because equity and bonus travel differently across borders; the United Kingdom, Egypt and the unverified markets all sit lower on total than on base.
  • No level-dependent compression factors are applied, because the bundle contains no evidence that any APA market compresses differently at junior and senior tiers.
  • Where no direct city observation exists, the cell is marked modeled and should be treated as a planning envelope rather than a benchmark.

Variable Pay & Annual Cash Incentive

APA discloses its executive annual incentive design in unusual detail and discloses nothing about the employee bonus grid. The scorecard weightings, corporate result and individual factors below are company disclosures. The tier targets are modeled from bonus components observed in public salary submissions and are not APA policy.

BandTargetMechanismRecent payout
T0
Intern
None observedInterns are paid a fixed programme rate with no observed incentive component.Not publicly disclosed
T1
Entry Professional
8% of baseAnnual cash incentive on company, team and individual performance.Not publicly disclosed
T2
Professional
11% of baseAnnual cash incentive on company, team and individual performance.Not publicly disclosed
T3
Analyst
12% of baseAnnual cash incentive on company, team and individual performance.Not publicly disclosed
T4
Senior Professional
13% of baseAnnual cash incentive on company, team and individual performance.Not publicly disclosed
T5
Engineer / Geoscientist
15% of baseAnnual cash incentive with operational metrics such as lifting and workover costs in the line of sight.Not publicly disclosed
T6
Geologist / Subsurface Specialist
16% of baseAnnual cash incentive with net production and exploration outcomes in the line of sight.Not publicly disclosed
T7
Drilling Engineer
17% of baseAnnual cash incentive with development capital expenditure and well-cost metrics in the line of sight.Not publicly disclosed
T8
Reservoir Engineer
18% of baseAnnual cash incentive; the Houston role page shows a $27,000 bonus median against a $151,000 base median.Not publicly disclosed
T9
Advisor / Principal
18% of baseAnnual cash incentive weighted towards asset and technical outcomes.Not publicly disclosed
M1
Supervisor / Manager
20% of baseAnnual cash incentive with a team delivery and safety component.Not publicly disclosed
M2
Director
25% of baseAnnual cash incentive weighted towards asset or function results.Not publicly disclosed
VP
Vice President
60% of baseExecutive-style plan on the corporate scorecard plus an individual factor.Not publicly disclosed
SVP
Senior Vice President
75% of baseExecutive-style plan on the corporate scorecard plus an individual factor.Not publicly disclosed
EVP
Executive Vice President
100% of baseAnnual cash incentive on the corporate scorecard, adjusted by an individual performance factor of 0 to 200 percent.189.8% of target, or 200% for Rodgers after a 105.4% individual factor
Pres
President
120% of baseAnnual cash incentive on the corporate scorecard, adjusted by an individual performance factor of 0 to 200 percent.200% of target after a 105.4% individual factor
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
140% of baseAnnual cash incentive on the corporate scorecard, adjusted by an individual performance factor of 0 to 200 percent.189.8% of target with a 100% individual factor
ModeledVerifiedThe 2025 executive scorecard was weighted 70 percent financial and operational, 20 percent environment health and safety and 10 percent strategic, so 90 percent of the outcome ran on quantitative metrics. Cost performance was split into development capital expenditure, lifting plus workover costs and gross department costs, and net production was reintroduced as a standalone metric. The corporate result certified for 2025 was 189.8 percent of target. The committee may then apply an individual performance factor between 0 and 200 percent, which is how Riney and Rodgers reached the 200 percent outcome.

Executive incentive targets — percent of salary

Chief Executive Officer
140% of base salary
On a $1,300,000 salary this is an $1,820,000 target; the 2025 payout was $3,454,360.
President
120% of base salary
On a $900,000 salary this is a $1,080,000 target; the individual factor of 105.4 percent lifted the outcome to the 200 percent cap.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
100% of base salary
Rodgers also reached 200 percent after a 105.4 percent individual factor, with the excess reported in the bonus column.
Executive Vice President, Exploration
100% of base salary
Henderson received the corporate result of 189.8 percent with a 100 percent individual factor.
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
100% of base salary
Warnica received 189.8 percent; her separate $500,000 sign-on bonus was subject to clawback conditions and is not part of the incentive plan.

Named-executive outcomes

ExecutiveTargetPaidAttainment
John J. Christmann IV$1,820,000$3,454,360189.8% of target
Stephen J. Riney$1,080,000$2,160,000200.0% of target
Ben C. Rodgers$528,171$1,056,341200.0% of target
Tracey K. Henderson$625,000$1,186,250189.8% of target
Kimberly O. Warnica$606,859$1,151,818189.8% of target

Employee payout timing and history

APA publishes no target bonus percentage by employee band and no companywide payout history. The 189.8 percent corporate result applies to the executive plan and must not be read as a companywide multiplier. The tier targets shown above are modeled from bonus components observed in public Apache Houston salary submissions, with the Reservoir Engineer role page the only row backed by a direct observation.

Sales and special incentives

APA is an exploration and production company with no consumer or enterprise sales force, so there is no quota, commission or accelerator structure to describe. Marketing and midstream commercial roles are not separately disclosed and carry the same modeled targets as their tier peers, which may understate commercially incentivised positions.


Equity — RSUs, PSUs, Options & ESPP

The 2026 proxy states that essentially all APA employees participate in equity-based compensation programmes regardless of business unit, which is a materially broader statement than most large employers make. What it does not do is disclose grant values, share counts or frequency for anyone below the named executive layer, so broad eligibility coexists with complete opacity on sizing. APA runs no employee stock purchase plan in any reviewed source.

APA Corporation 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan
Active; the Third Amendment was approved by shareholders on 21 May 2026
Verified
Permits stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance awards and other awards for officers, employees and non-employee directors. Time-based restricted stock units generally vest ratably over three years and options generally become exercisable ratably over three years, with the 2026 executive option grants carrying ten-year terms.
Reserve: 4,451,927 shares underlying outstanding options and rights at a $35.17 weighted-average exercise price at 31 December 2025, with 5,180,719 remaining under shareholder-approved plans; about 2,772,165 remained for the 2016 Plan at 28 February 2026 before 24,160,000 shares were added in May 2026
2026 proxy statement, the 26 May 2026 Form 8-K and the 1 June 2026 Form S-8
2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan
Legacy; outstanding awards only
Verified
Historical awards remain included in the shareholder-approved equity plan table. No current new grants under this plan were identified in any reviewed filing.
Reserve: Residual outstanding awards only, reported inside the combined plan table
2026 proxy statement equity compensation plan information table
Deferred Delivery Plan
Active; reported in the non-shareholder-approved category
Verified
Officers and certain key employees may defer restricted stock unit income into deferred units, each equivalent to one APA share. Distributions generally begin five years after deferral or on termination depending on the participant election.
Reserve: 75,778 securities outstanding under non-approved plans with 541,956 remaining at 31 December 2025
2026 proxy statement
Directors' Compensation Plan and Outside Directors' Deferral Program
Active
Verified
Non-employee directors receive a $200,000 annual restricted stock unit grant, delivered quarterly, which vests at grant but is automatically and mandatorily deferred until board service ends. The non-executive chair receives an additional $100,000 grant.
Reserve: Granted from the shareholder-approved reserve rather than a separate pool
2026 proxy statement director compensation disclosure
  • The 2016 Plan uses fungible pool accounting: an option or stock appreciation right consumes 1.0 pool share per share awarded, while a full-value award such as a restricted stock unit or performance award consumes 2.39 pool shares. A simple granted-over-authorised utilisation percentage is therefore meaningless for this plan.
  • Total remaining capacity across approved and non-approved plans was 5,722,675 shares at 31 December 2025, before the May 2026 amendment added 24,160,000 shares and extended the plan term to 21 May 2036.
  • The precise ungranted balance after the May 2026 amendment is not publicly disclosed, because grants, forfeitures and recycling continued after the measurement dates.
  • The reintroduction of stock options into the 2025 executive mix changes the pool arithmetic as well as the pay design, because options consume pool capacity at less than half the rate of a full-value award.

Equity plan capacity and grant design

24.16M
Shares added to the 2016 Plan in May 2026
Approved on 21 May 2026 and registered on Form S-8 on 1 June 2026, alongside a term extension to 21 May 2036.
2.39x
Pool debit for a full-value award
Options and stock appreciation rights consume 1.0 pool share per share awarded instead.
$35.17
Weighted-average exercise price on 4,451,927 shares
Outstanding options and rights under shareholder-approved plans at 31 December 2025.
60 / 20 / 20
2025 executive long-term incentive mix
Performance awards, stock options and time-based restricted stock units; the proxy frames this as 80 percent performance based.

Vesting — common reported employee schedule

Year 1
33%
+33% · annual tranche
Year 2
67%
+34% · annual tranche
Year 3
100%
+33% · annual tranche

Time-based restricted stock units generally vest ratably over three years and options generally become exercisable ratably over three years. Performance awards work differently: the 2025 cycle covers 2025 to 2027, is weighted 60 percent relative total shareholder return and 40 percent cash return on invested capital, pays between 0 and 200 percent of target, and settles half after the three-year period with the remaining half a further year later. The 2023 cycle was earned at 120 percent of target, with half vesting in 2026 and the balance scheduled for 2027. Director restricted stock units vest at grant but are mandatorily deferred until board service ends.

Eligibility by hierarchy level

  • The 2026 proxy states that essentially all employees participate in equity-based compensation programmes regardless of business unit. That is the single strongest equity-eligibility statement in this report and it is a genuine differentiator against employers where stock begins only at senior grades.
  • Broad eligibility does not mean transparent sizing. Grant values, share counts, refresh cadence and the mix of restricted stock units against performance awards below the named executive layer are all not publicly disclosed, so no employee grant matrix can be constructed.
  • The corroborating employee-level evidence is the Glassdoor Apache Reservoir Engineer Houston role page, which reports a $30,000 stock median inside a $208,000 total median. That confirms stock reaches ordinary technical staff even though the grant rule is unpublished.
  • The stock ownership requirements are the clearest published hierarchy signal in the whole equity programme: two times base salary at vice president, two and a half at senior vice president, three at executive vice president, four at president and ten at chief executive. Officers must also retain at least 15 percent after tax of shares acquired on restricted stock unit and performance award settlement.
  • APA operates no employee stock purchase plan in any reviewed source, so the discounted-purchase mechanism common at technology employers has no equivalent here. The retirement plans carry that role instead.

Indicative annual grant value by band — Houston

BandAnnual value (USD)MedianShares at $42.96
T1$3K$5K$4K~70116
T2$5K$9K$7K~122204
T3$7K$11K$9K~157262
T4$8K$14K$11K~192320
T5$12K$19K$16K~271451
T6$15K$26K$21K~358596
T7$18K$31K$25K~428713
T8$23K$38K$30K~524873
T9$28K$46K$37K~6461,077
M1$26K$44K$35K~6111,018
M2$50K$83K$66K~1,1521,920
VP$165K$275K$220K~3,8416,401
SVP$450K$750K$600K~10,47517,458
EVP$1.22M$2.03M$1.62M~28,28847,146
Pres$3.38M$5.63M$4.50M~78,642131,069
CEO$5.94M$9.90M$7.92M~138,206230,343
Board$150K$250K$200K~3,4925,819

Annualized planning value (±25%), not the face value of every new-hire grant. Share equivalents use the $42.96 reference price at 24 August 2026 completed-session close and ignore plan valuation rules and PSU performance. Highlighted rows are disclosed grant-date stock awards.

Named executive target equity

ExecutiveTargetUnits / structure
John J. Christmann IV
Chief Executive Officer
$9.49M 2025 target long-term incentive60 percent performance awards, 20 percent stock options and 20 percent time-based restricted stock units. The 6 January 2026 grant was 79,480 restricted stock units vesting on 1 February 2027, 6 January 2028 and 6 January 2029, plus 194,666 options at a $23.88 exercise price expiring 6 January 2036.
Stephen J. Riney
President
$5.40M 2025 target long-term incentiveThe same 60 / 20 / 20 mix. Reported 2025 stock awards were $3,424,602 and option awards $1,079,994 at grant-date value.
Ben C. Rodgers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
$1.50M 2025 target long-term incentiveGranted before his promotion to Chief Financial Officer, so the target understates the steady-state package for the role. Reported 2025 stock awards were $951,232 and option awards $299,993.
Tracey K. Henderson
Executive Vice President, Exploration
$2.1875M 2025 target long-term incentiveThe same 60 / 20 / 20 mix, delivering $1,387,251 of stock awards and $437,498 of option awards at grant-date value.
Kimberly O. Warnica
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
$2.1875M 2025 target long-term incentiveMatches Henderson at $1,347,454 of stock awards and $437,498 of option awards, alongside a separate $500,000 sign-on bonus subject to clawback conditions.
VerifiedAPA does not operate an employee stock purchase plan in any source reviewed for this report, so there is no discount, no lookback and no payroll purchase mechanism to model. The nearest equivalent value for a United States employee is the retirement package: a 401(k) company match on the first 8 percent of base pay and incentive bonus, plus a 6 percent annual company contribution to the Money Purchase Retirement Plan, which together are worth up to 14 percent of eligible pay before any equity grant.

Executive Compensation

2025 Summary Compensation Table values from the 2026 proxy statement filed on 9 April 2026. Equity figures are grant-date accounting values rather than cash received, and the 2025 cash incentive column reflects an unusually strong corporate scorecard result of 189.8 percent of target.

CEO total — John J. Christmann IV
$13.20M
Stock awards are 60% of the reported total; salary 10% and non-equity incentive 26%
10%
26%
60%
Salary $1.30M
Incentive $3.45M
Equity $7.92M
Base salary$1,300,000
Non-equity incentive plan payout$3,454,360
Stock awards at grant-date value$6,018,436
Option awards at grant-date value$1,897,996
All other compensation$531,725
Reported total$13,202,517

Reading the package

Salary was about 9.8 percent of the chief executive's 2025 reported total, the cash incentive about 26.2 percent and equity about 60.0 percent. That is a far more cash-weighted profile than a technology chief executive, but the equity half is heavily conditioned: 60 percent of the target long-term incentive is performance awards that pay between 0 and 200 percent on relative total shareholder return and cash return on invested capital, and a further 20 percent is options that are worthless without share-price appreciation.

CEO-to-median-employee ratio
56:1
Median employee $237,527 · The median employee is identified across the whole workforce, which for APA means a blend of United States, United Kingdom and Egypt pay. A workforce that is 59 percent United States and heavily weighted towards experienced technical staff produces a high median and therefore a low ratio by large-cap standards..
Peer CEO comparison
Occidental Petroleum · Vicki Hollub · 2025$18.06M
Occidental 2026 proxy statement
EOG Resources · Ezra Yacob · 2025$17.58M
EOG Resources 2026 proxy statement
Diamondback Energy · Kaes Van't Hof · 2025$14.93M
Diamondback Energy 2026 proxy statement
Devon Energy · Clay Gaspar · 2025$12.57M
Devon Energy 2026 proxy statement

APA's chief executive sits fourth of five in this comparison set, above Devon and below Occidental, EOG and Diamondback. Raw Summary Compensation Table totals are not perfectly comparable across these companies because grant timing, performance-award valuation methodology and chief executive transition years differ, and none of them equals realized pay. The gap to Occidental and EOG is roughly 33 to 37 percent on a company that is far smaller by headcount.


Named Executive Officers & Board

The leadership team is stable at the top and has been reshaped below it. John J. Christmann IV remains Chief Executive Officer and Stephen J. Riney remains President. Ben C. Rodgers moved into the Chief Financial Officer role during the period covered by the 2025 disclosures, which is why his long-term incentive target of $1.5 million reflects a pre-promotion grant. D. Clay Bretches departed as Executive Vice President, Operations, with $1,577,532 of all other compensation reflecting separation arrangements.

John J. Christmann IV · Chief Executive Officer$13.20M
Salary $1.30M · Cash incentive $3.45M · Stock $7.92M · Other $532K · Equity 60%
Stephen J. Riney · President$7.91M
Salary $900K · Cash incentive $2.16M · Stock $4.50M · Other $340K · Equity 57%
Kimberly O. Warnica · Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary$4.16M
Salary $607K · Cash incentive $1.65M · Stock $1.78M · Other $114K · Equity 42.9%
D. Clay Bretches · Former Executive Vice President, Operations$4.12M
Salary $291K · Cash incentive $0 · Stock $2.25M · Other $1.58M · Equity 54.7%
Tracey K. Henderson · Executive Vice President, Exploration$3.84M
Salary $625K · Cash incentive $1.19M · Stock $1.82M · Other $208K · Equity 47.5%
Ben C. Rodgers · Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer$3.04M
Salary $580K · Cash incentive $1.06M · Stock $1.25M · Other $157K · Equity 41.1%

Two figures in the Summary Compensation Table need reading carefully. Kimberly Warnica's cash column includes a $500,000 sign-on bonus subject to clawback conditions on top of her $1,151,818 annual incentive, so her total is not a steady-state Chief Legal Officer package. Stephen Riney and Ben Rodgers each received a discretionary amount in the bonus column, $110,160 and $53,873 respectively, that lifted their formula-determined incentive from the 189.8 percent corporate result to the 200 percent individual cap. Named executive salaries were held flat for the 2025 cycle, so the entire increase in reported pay came from the incentive result and the redesigned long-term incentive mix.

Board compensation framework

ElementAmountNotes
Annual cash retainer$100,000Paid to each non-employee director, with no separate meeting attendance fees.
Non-executive chair additional cash$100,000Paid to Lamar McKay on top of the standard cash retainer.
Audit and MD&C committee chairs$20,000 eachThe largest committee chair retainers, reflecting the workload.
CRG&N and Cybersecurity committee chairs$15,000 eachPaid in addition to the base cash retainer.
Audit committee non-chair member$5,000The only member-level committee retainer disclosed.
Annual restricted stock unit grant$200,000Delivered quarterly, vesting at grant but mandatorily deferred until board service ends.
Non-executive chair additional grant$100,000Brings the chair's annual equity to $300,000 on the same deferral terms.

A standard non-employee director therefore receives about $300,000 a year, $100,000 in cash and $200,000 in deferred restricted stock units, before any committee chair retainer. The non-executive chair receives about $500,000. Because director units vest at grant and are then deferred for the whole of board service, directors accumulate a share position they cannot monetise until they leave, which is a stronger alignment mechanism than a conventional vesting schedule.

Regional heads and other officers

Mark D. Maddox as Executive Vice President, Administration, the four senior vice presidents and the six vice presidents named on the leadership page did not qualify as named executives for 2025, so no compensation table exists for any of them. Maddox is the only one visible in the transaction record, through his 6 January 2026 grant of 18,320 restricted stock units and 44,871 options. For the rest, the stock ownership requirements are the only quantified obligation in the public record.


Insider Trades — SEC Forms 3/4/5

APA is Nasdaq-listed, so the governing record is SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 rather than any Indian exchange filing, and the SEBI and SAST promoter-group framework does not apply. The sampled activity below is compensation grants rather than open-market trading. Share values use the $42.96 completed-session close of 24 August 2026 purely as an illustrative reference, not as a grant-date fair value.

DatePersonTransactionSharesPriceValue
2026-01-06
John J. Christmann IV
Chief Executive Officer
Award
Restricted stock unit grant vesting in three instalments on 1 February 2027, 6 January 2028 and 6 January 2029.
79,480$3.41M
2026-01-06
John J. Christmann IV
Chief Executive Officer
Award
Stock option grant with a ten-year term expiring 6 January 2036, becoming exercisable ratably over three years from 6 January 2027. The value shown is illustrative intrinsic value at the reference price, not grant-date fair value.
194,666$23.88$3.71M
2026-01-06
Mark D. Maddox
Executive Vice President, Administration
Award
Restricted stock unit grant on the same date and mechanics as the chief executive award.
18,320$787K
2026-01-06
Mark D. Maddox
Executive Vice President, Administration
Award
Stock option grant with a ten-year term and ratable three-year exercisability. The value shown is illustrative intrinsic value at the reference price.
44,871$23.88$856K

Reading guide

These are grants, not tradesEvery row above is a compensation award filed on Form 4. None is an open-market purchase or sale, and none should be read as a directional signal about the stock.
The exercise price matters more than the countThe $23.88 option strike against a $42.96 reference price is why the option component carries real intrinsic value today. At a lower share price the same grant would be worth nothing, which is precisely why the proxy counts options as performance based.
The ledger here is a sample, not the full recordAn exhaustive insider ledger would require enumerating every officer and director Form 4 row including vesting, tax withholding and gifts. The research bundle sampled the two January 2026 grants and did not establish any material discretionary sale.
Retention is enforced by ownership rulesOfficers must hold between two and ten times base salary in shares and must retain at least 15 percent after tax of everything that settles, so a large share of vested equity is structurally unsellable.

Benefits & Perks

APA's benefit disclosure is strong for the United States, where the proxy and sustainability reporting quantify the retirement package precisely, and thin everywhere else. The rows below are recorded only where a named source supports them; the United Kingdom and Egypt entries deliberately record what is missing rather than importing generic market practice.

United States

  • Retirement401(k) Savings Plan with a company match on the first 8 percent. The match applies to base pay and incentive bonus. This is one of the highest match ceilings disclosed by any large United States employer in this report series. [official]
  • RetirementMoney Purchase Retirement Plan at a 6 percent company contribution. An annual employer contribution paid regardless of employee deferral, stacking on top of the 401(k) match for up to 14 percent of eligible pay. APA operates no defined benefit pension for United States employees. [official]
  • MedicalMedical, dental, pharmacy and vision cover. Described in the 2026 proxy as standard employee benefits. The carrier, plan tiers and the employee premium split are not published. [official]
  • ProtectionGroup term life at two times base salary. Standard disability cover applies alongside it, with an enhanced long-term disability arrangement disclosed separately for officers. [official]
  • LeavePaid parental, elder-care and bereavement leave. Company holidays, flexible holidays and vacation are described in the proxy and careers material, but the current day counts are not disclosed. [official]
  • FamilyFertility, adoption and surrogacy support with backup care. Described in the 2024 People Fact Sheet, which is dated programme evidence; the current reimbursement limits are not published. [reported]
  • GivingWorkplace giving matched dollar for dollar up to $10,000 a year. Applied to qualified nonprofit contributions, with the $10,000 per-person ceiling stated for 2025. [official]
  • WellbeingOn-site fitness facilities and flexible hours. Fitness facilities are provided at several office locations and the careers page states flexible-hour options. [official]

Global programs

  • EquityEssentially all employees participate in equity-based compensation. Stated in the 2026 proxy statement regardless of business unit. Grant values, share counts and cadence below the named executive layer are not disclosed. [official]
  • Pay equityAnnual wage-gap analysis with biennial third-party validation. APA states that it runs a pay-gap analysis as part of annual compensation planning, that a third-party consultant reviews and validates the fair-pay analysis every two years, and that it corrects unexplained differences. [official]
  • Pay structureEstablished pay bands for all positions. Rooted in labour-market data, with annual pay-change guidelines considering the employee's position in range, performance rating and location. None of the band values is published. [official]
  • DevelopmentOwn and grow your career development philosophy. APA describes support for both vertical and lateral moves and states that compensation decision-makers are trained on performance feedback and objective rating decisions. [official]
  • EmploymentApache Corporation is the employing entity. Whether a team member supports APA Corporation or a subsidiary, employment sits with Apache Corporation, which is why third-party salary records filed under Apache are the correct records. [official]

Benefit fields not publicly quantified

Employee premium contributions, plan tiers, carrier names and eligibility waiting periods are not published in any market. Outside the United States the picture is thinner still: no United Kingdom pension rate, private medical provider, annual-leave allowance or offshore allowance matrix was verified, and no Egypt medical, leave or allowance schedule was located at all. These are recorded as not publicly disclosed rather than filled in with market practice.


Performance Review & Pay Progression

APA discloses the architecture of its performance and pay process without disclosing any of its outputs. It confirms that pay bands exist for all positions, that annual compensation-change guidance uses pay range, performance rating and location, that objective metrics are linked to compensation, and that decision-makers are trained on feedback and objective rating decisions. It publishes no rating scale, no distribution and no increase percentages.

Not publicly disclosed

The employee rating scale and its labels are not publicly disclosed, so no rating-to-increase table can be constructed.
Whether APA uses a forced distribution or bell curve, and what share of employees lands in each bucket, is not publicly disclosed.
Annual increment percentages by rating, promotion increase percentages and typical time in each band are all not publicly disclosed.
The month in which annual increases take effect, the standard annual increase percentage and the off-cycle market adjustment policy are not publicly disclosed.
Probation and confirmation timelines, and any difference between the individual contributor and management review processes, are not publicly disclosed.
APA publishes no companywide voluntary or involuntary attrition rate, so the 22.3 percent workforce reduction in 2025 must not be converted into an attrition figure.

Modeled promotion planning timeline

BandYears to next scopePromotion hikeStatus
T0Conversion offer at the end of the programmeNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T1Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T2Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T3Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T4Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T5Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T6Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T7Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T8Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
T9Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
M1Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
M2Not publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
VPNot publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
SVPNot publicly disclosedNot disclosedModeled planning interval
EVPCommittee appointmentNot disclosedModeled planning interval
PresBoard appointmentNot disclosedModeled planning interval
CEOBoard appointmentNot disclosedModeled planning interval
BoardAnnual re-electionNot disclosedModeled planning interval

The one part of the cycle with real visibility is the executive equity calendar: the 2026 grants for the chief executive and Mark Maddox were both dated 6 January 2026, suggesting an early-January annual grant date for officers. Nothing equivalent is published for the general employee population, and no companywide salary hike percentage for 2025 or 2026 was found in any reviewed source.

Pay progression evidence

Modeled progression, not APA policy. The observed Houston steps imply roughly 42 percent from the entry professional tier to the professional tier, 17 percent from professional to analyst, 6 percent from analyst to senior professional, 29 percent from senior professional to the engineering tier, 19 percent from engineering to the subsurface specialist tier and 8 percent from there to the well-delivery tiers. These are gaps between different title families in a snapshot rather than promotion increases for an individual, and APA discloses neither time in band nor promotion increase percentages, so they should be read as market structure and not as a career timetable.


H-1B / LCA Visa Footprint — United States

APA is a very light H-1B sponsor. The entire public record for Apache Corporation across nine years is a handful of certified labour condition applications, with a single filing in 2025 and no reported FY2026 petition activity. Everything below is therefore a small-sample record rather than a wage distribution, and labour condition application wages are proffered base salary only.

Certified applications in 2025
1
A Network Administration Analyst II in Houston, filed 16 June 2025 and certified.
2025 average proffered base
$112,500
MyVisaJobs independently reports the same $112,500 average and notes that these are base guaranteed salaries excluding bonuses and stock.
Historical median across listed filings
$116,250
Across the eight Apache Corporation labour condition applications listed by Ellis between 2017 and 2025.
FY2026 activity as of 19 May 2026
None reported
MyVisaJobs showed no FY2026 labour petition activity for the employer at its latest update.

Dataset summary

DatasetResultInterpretation
Ellis visa-sponsor profile8 listed labour condition applications from 2017 to 2025 at a $116,250 medianThe source of the year-by-year certification history and the full salary ledger used below.
MyVisaJobs employer overview$112,500 average proffered salary for 2025 and no FY2026 activityUpdated 19 May 2026. It also displays Houston petition decisions since 2017 with approvals and no denials in the shown sample.

City-level H-1B wage history

CityP25MedianP75Records
Houston, Texas
Four historical certified applications in 2017, 2019, 2023 and 2025. Quantiles are researcher-derived by linear interpolation across those four salary points, not a published Department of Labor distribution.
$109K$123,750$141K4
San Antonio, Texas
Four historical applications in 2018 and 2019, one of which was later certified-withdrawn. Quantiles use the same linear interpolation method and the same caveats apply.
$91K$110,000$123K4

All-years aggregates. P25/P75 are rounded reconstruction values marked modeled; medians and record counts are the stronger fields.

Selected title / worksite records

TitleWorksiteProffered wageNotes
Network Administration Analyst IIHouston, Texas$112,500 certified 16 June 2025The only 2025 filing and the basis for the reported 2025 average proffered salary.
SQL Server AdministratorHouston, Texas$135,000 certified 3 August 2023The only filing between 2019 and 2025, showing how sporadic the sponsorship is.
Production Engineer SeniorHouston, Texas$159,720 certified 6 September 2017The highest wage in the ledger and the only senior technical role in it.
Flow Assurance EngineerSan Antonio, Texas$120,000 certified 12 March 2019Filed alongside an Energy Fundamentals Research Analyst in Houston at $100,000 in the same month.
Production Systems SpecialistSan Antonio, Texas$130,000 certified 15 May 2018The largest of the three 2018 San Antonio filings, which also included a Chemist Sr. at $100,000.
Data Services TechSan Antonio, Texas$65,000 certified then withdrawn, 15 March 2018The lowest wage in the ledger and the only certified-withdrawn record, which is why the raw count overstates hiring.

Reading the data correctly

  • With one filing in 2025 and eight across nine years, these figures cannot support a percentile analysis in any statistical sense. They are reproduced because they are the only government-derived wage records that exist for this employer.
  • Labour condition application wages are proffered base salary. They exclude the annual incentive and the equity component, which together are roughly a quarter of an observed Houston technical package.
  • City percentiles here are derived by linear interpolation across four salary points spanning eight years and are not adjusted for wage inflation over that period. They are analytical estimates, not a published distribution.
  • A labour condition application is a filing, not a hire. Certification by the Department of Labor is not the same as approval of a petition by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
  • The San Antonio records date from 2018 and 2019 and APA lists no San Antonio office at year-end 2025, so that row describes a historical worksite rather than a current one.

Key Nuances & Insights

01The employing entity is Apache, not APA

APA Corporation became the listed holding company in 2021 and Apache Corporation remained the subsidiary that employs the workforce. Salary records, visa filings and review sites all sit under Apache, so a name mismatch is evidence of the corporate structure rather than a reason to discard the data.

02Equity is genuinely broad here

The 2026 proxy states that essentially all employees participate in equity-based compensation regardless of business unit. That is a materially stronger statement than most employers make and it is corroborated at employee level by a $30,000 stock median on the Houston Reservoir Engineer role page.

03Broad eligibility is not transparent sizing

Nothing in any filing states what an ordinary employee's grant is worth, how often it is refreshed, or whether it is restricted stock units, performance awards or both. Any grant matrix below the named executive layer would be invented.

04The pay ratio is low because the median is high

A 56 to 1 ratio looks conservative next to large-cap technology, but the driver is a $237,527 median employee, not a modest chief executive package. A workforce of 1,791 people that is 59 percent United States and heavily technical produces a median several times the retail or manufacturing norm.

05This is a cash-weighted executive package

Salary and annual incentive together were about 36 percent of the chief executive's 2025 reported total, against roughly 3 percent salary at a large technology issuer. The annual scorecard therefore moves executive pay far more here than it would elsewhere.

06Options came back into the mix

The 2025 long-term incentive redesign put 20 percent into stock options alongside 60 percent performance awards and 20 percent restricted stock units. At a $23.88 strike against a $42.96 reference price the January 2026 grants are already well in the money, but options are the component that can go to zero.

07The equity pool arithmetic is not intuitive

Full-value awards consume 2.39 pool shares each while options consume 1.0, so authorised shares are not an apples-to-apples grant capacity measure and a simple utilisation percentage cannot be calculated for this plan.

08The workforce shrank by more than a fifth in one year

Full-time equivalents fell from 2,305 to 1,791 during 2025 and APA raised its expected 2026 exit run-rate cost savings to about $500 million in August 2026. Salary submissions collected before that reshaping describe a workforce structure that is changing quickly.

09Headcount change is not attrition

APA publishes no voluntary or involuntary attrition rate. The 22.3 percent reduction blends divestitures, restructuring and ordinary departures, and converting it into an attrition figure would be a fabrication.

10India and Australia are not APA geographies

The original research brief assumed an India-anchored model. APA reported no India or Australia employees in its 2025 Form 10-K, and APA Corporation is unrelated to the Australian infrastructure business APA Group on the ASX. Those markets are kept as explicit research gaps rather than populated with invented ladders.

11Ownership rules substitute for a published band structure

With no grade codes public, the stock ownership multiples are the clearest visible hierarchy: two times salary at vice president, two and a half at senior vice president, three at executive vice president, four at president and ten at chief executive, plus a 15 percent after-tax retention requirement on everything that settles.

12Line of sight is designed into the scorecard

APA split cost performance into development capital expenditure, lifting plus workover costs and gross department costs, and reintroduced net production as a standalone metric, explicitly so that field, support and asset teams can each see how their work moves the number. That design intent is disclosed even though the employee payout grid is not.

Research control

APA's chief executive pay of $13.20 million sits below Occidental at $18.06 million, EOG at $17.58 million and Diamondback at $14.93 million, and above Devon at $12.57 million, on a company far smaller than any of them by headcount. Its 56 to 1 pay ratio is among the lowest in the large-cap energy set because the median employee earns $237,527. On the employee side the Houston technical tiers price competitively for the sector, with drilling and reservoir engineering roles running about 65 percent above corporate finance roles in the same building, but no peer internal-grade crosswalk is possible because no exploration and production company publishes a grade system.

Evidence classification

LabelMeaningExamples and permitted use
VerifiedAn APA or Apache SEC filing, an official APA web page or sustainability disclosure, or a government record.Executive and director pay, the pay ratio, equity plan mechanics, ownership requirements, headcount by country, the office list and the United States retirement benefits.
ReportedA named third-party dataset with observable records, chiefly Glassdoor employer pages for Apache Houston and Apache North Sea, and the Ellis and MyVisaJobs visa aggregators.The Houston anchor medians for tiers T0 to T8, the Aberdeen calibration and the labour condition application wage record.
ModeledThe Houston anchor multiplied by a city calibration factor and foreign exchange, inside a planning envelope.The advisor, manager, director, vice president and senior vice president rows, and every city without a direct observation.
Not publicly disclosedNo source in the research bundle supports a figure.Recorded as such rather than estimated, which is why the Egypt and United Kingdom benefit tables are mostly empty.

Explicit “Not publicly disclosed” index

Official numeric band or grade identifiers and any title-to-grade mapping
Salary minimum, midpoint and maximum inside APA's proprietary pay bands
Band-specific experience ranges and time-in-band expectations
Target variable pay percentages for any non-executive band
Equity grant values, share counts and refresh cadence below the named executive layer
Egypt salary ladder, bonus structure and benefit detail of any kind
United Kingdom pension contribution rate, medical provider, leave allowance and offshore allowance matrix
Appraisal rating labels, distribution percentages and rating-to-increase mapping
Promotion increase percentage, annual hike percentage and the effective month
Companywide voluntary or involuntary attrition rate
Compensation for vice presidents, senior vice presidents and non-named executive officers
An exhaustive Form 4 insider ledger beyond the two sampled January 2026 grants
A controlled onshore-to-offshore differential for the same job and grade
City-level headcount for any market

Known gaps and diligence before relying on a cell

  1. 1The Reservoir Engineer tier has two conflicting public figures in the same source family: the Glassdoor Apache Houston title table shows a $223,500 midpoint while the dedicated role page shows a $208,000 total median. This report uses $208,000 because the role page is the only record that splits base, bonus and stock, and it names its sample of seventeen submissions.
  2. 2Cairo, Paramaribo, France, Tulsa, Bangalore, Sydney, Auckland and Singapore carry no company-specific salary evidence at all. Their calibration factors are planning envelopes chosen to keep the location selector usable and must not be read as observations of APA pay in those markets.
  3. 3The Aberdeen factors are drawn from ten Glassdoor North Sea titles with samples of one to three submissions each, several of which the source itself labels low confidence, and one of which dates to October 2023. The market is directionally evidenced but not reliably calibrated.
  4. 4The vice president and senior vice president rows have no compensation disclosure of any kind. They are modeled between the director tier and the named executive averages using the ownership multiples as the only anchor, and they are the least reliable rows in the band table.
  5. 5The executive vice president row averages three people whose packages differ substantially, and Warnica's $500,000 sign-on bonus is inside that average, so it overstates a steady-state executive vice president package by roughly $167,000 of cash.
  6. 6The share price of $42.96 is a completed-session reference close from 24 August 2026. The bundle notes that a localised data page returned a conflicting figure, so this value is used only for illustrative share-value math and not as a valuation assertion.
  7. 7The bundle's foreign-exchange snapshot covers only the United States dollar, sterling, the Egyptian pound, the rupee and the Australian dollar. The euro, New Zealand dollar and Singapore dollar rates used for France, Auckland and Singapore are same-date reference rates from outside the bundle.
  8. 8APA reports revenue by segment in its filings but the bundle records only total 2025 revenue of about $8.92 billion and production revenue of about $7.229 billion, so no geographic revenue split is presented in this report.
  9. 9No companywide salary hike percentage, pay freeze, salary cut or off-cycle correction for 2025 or 2026 was located in any reviewed source, and no employee-level payout percentage against target exists for any year.

FX rates used — 1 USD equals, snapshot 2026-08-25

0.733479
GBP
50.3515
EGP
0.857486
EUR
95.4075
INR
1.39836
AUD
1.676128
NZD
1.27028
SGD

Single-date conversion layer for comparability; it ignores payroll-date FX, tax, purchasing power, benefits valuation and hedging. Compensation intelligence, not legal, tax, investment, immigration or employment advice.

Source register — 16 sources

10-K 2025APA Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2025 · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-02-26. Operating areas, full-time equivalents by country, the year-end office list, revenue and human capital disclosure. SEC accession 0001841666-26-000015.
DEF 14A 2026APA Corporation 2026 Definitive Proxy Statement · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-04-09. Named executive compensation, the annual incentive scorecard, long-term incentive design, the pay ratio, officer ownership requirements, retirement benefits, director compensation and the equity plan table. SEC accession 0001193125-26-149453.
8-K May 2026APA Corporation Form 8-K on the annual meeting results · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-05-26. Shareholder approval of the Third Amendment to the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. SEC accession 0001841666-26-000037.
S-8 Jun 2026APA Corporation Form S-8 registration statement · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-06-01. Registration of 24,160,000 additional plan shares and confirmation of the 21 May 2036 plan expiry. SEC accession 0001841666-26-000042.
Forms 4Section 16 filings for John J. Christmann IV and Mark D. Maddox · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-01-08. The 6 January 2026 restricted stock unit and stock option grants, their vesting schedules, the $23.88 exercise price and the 6 January 2036 expiry.
10-K 2024APA Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2024 · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2025-02-01. The 2,305 full-time equivalents at 31 December 2024 used for the year-on-year workforce comparison.
Q2 2026APA Corporation second-quarter 2026 financial and operational results · APA Corporation · 2026-08-05. The increase in expected 2026 exit run-rate cost savings to about $500 million and the cited field, well-cost and corporate streamlining drivers.
SustainabilityAPA Our Approach to Sustainability 2025, employee Total Rewards section · APA Corporation · 2026-08-25. Confirmation that pay bands exist for all positions, the annual wage-gap analysis, the biennial third-party fair-pay validation and the pay-change guidance inputs.
WorkforceAPA Our Workforce, Careers and Leadership pages · APA Corporation · 2026-08-25. Apache Corporation as the employing subsidiary, the current executive ladder, board composition, flexible hours and on-site fitness facilities.
People 2024APA People Fact Sheet 2024 · APA Corporation · 2024-12-31. Fertility treatment support, adoption and surrogacy reimbursement and backup child and elder care. Dated programme evidence with no current limits.
Glassdoor USGlassdoor Apache salaries in Houston and the Reservoir Engineer role page · Glassdoor · 2026-08-25. The Houston anchor medians for tiers T0 to T8 and the only public base, bonus and stock split for an ordinary APA employee role.
Glassdoor UKGlassdoor Apache North Sea salaries and the Principal Subsea Engineer page · Glassdoor · 2026-08-25. Ten Aberdeen title midpoints used for the United Kingdom calibration, several of them explicitly low confidence.
EllisEllis Apache Corporation H-1B sponsored salaries and labour condition application ledger · Ellis · 2026-04-30. The eight-record 2017 to 2025 wage ledger, the year-by-year certification history and the $116,250 historical median.
MyVisaJobsMyVisaJobs Apache Corporation employer overview · MyVisaJobs · 2026-05-19. The $112,500 average proffered salary for 2025, the absence of FY2026 activity and the Houston petition decision history.
Peer proxiesEOG Resources, Occidental Petroleum, Devon Energy and Diamondback Energy proxy statements · United States Securities and Exchange Commission · 2026-04-30. Peer chief executive compensation for the 2025 fiscal year.
FX and price25 August 2026 foreign-exchange snapshot and the 24 August 2026 APA reference close · Central bank reference rates and Investing.com historical data · 2026-08-25. Every local currency conversion in this report and the $42.96 illustrative share price.

Recent News & Workforce Trend

APA's 2026 has been dominated by cost restructuring and equity plan capacity rather than by any companywide compensation action. No employee salary hike, freeze or cut was announced in any reviewed source.

2,305
31 Dec 2024 employees
The comparison base reported in the 2024 Form 10-K.
1,791
31 Dec 2025 employees
Down 514 full-time equivalents, a 22.3 percent reduction in a single year.
1,061
of which United States employees
59.2 percent of the workforce, based at the Houston headquarters and the Midland office.
486
of which United Kingdom employees
27.1 percent of the workforce, based at the Aberdeen office serving the North Sea business.
242
of which Egypt employees
13.5 percent of the workforce, based at the Cairo office serving the concession operations.
2
of which France employees
0.1 percent of the workforce; the Form 10-K discloses the country total but not the city.

APA reports full-time equivalents by country rather than by city, so the geographic signal stops at national level. Suriname carries active development, exploration and appraisal work with zero direct full-time equivalents reported, which means that project is delivered through partners, contractors and assignees rather than through a local payroll. The 2025 contraction is the single most important context for every salary observation in this report, because most public submissions predate it.

5 Aug 2026
Expected 2026 exit run-rate cost savings raised to about $500 million

The second-quarter results lifted the target from $450 million, citing field efficiencies, well-cost reductions and continuing corporate streamlining. Cost discipline of that scale keeps pressure on headcount and on merit budgets.

Q2 2026 results
1 Jun 2026
Form S-8 registers 24.16 million additional plan shares

Implements the expanded 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan capacity approved by shareholders and confirms the 21 May 2036 plan expiry.

Form S-8
21 May 2026
Shareholders approve the Third Amendment to the 2016 Plan

Adds 24,160,000 shares and extends the plan through 21 May 2036, a substantial increase on the roughly 2.77 million shares available at 28 February 2026.

Form 8-K
9 Apr 2026
2026 proxy statement discloses 2025 executive compensation

Chief executive total compensation of $13,202,517 against a $237,527 median employee, a ratio of 56 to 1, with the annual incentive certified at 189.8 percent of target.

2026 proxy statement
26 Feb 2026
2025 Form 10-K reports 1,791 full-time equivalents

Down 22.3 percent from 2,305, split 1,061 United States, 486 United Kingdom, 242 Egypt and 2 France, with year-end offices in Houston, Midland, Cairo and Aberdeen.

Form 10-K
6 Jan 2026
Annual executive equity grants dated for the chief executive and Maddox

79,480 restricted stock units and 194,666 options at a $23.88 strike for Christmann, and 18,320 units and 44,871 options for Maddox, all on ratable three-year schedules.

Forms 4
31 Dec 2025
Workforce closes the year at 1,791 full-time equivalents

A 514-person reduction across the year. APA publishes no attrition rate, so this figure must not be converted into one.

Form 10-K
16 Jun 2025
The only 2025 H-1B labour condition application is certified

A Network Administration Analyst II in Houston at $112,500, which is also the reported 2025 average proffered salary for the employer.

Department of Labor records via Ellis
1 Jan 2025
Executive long-term incentive redesigned and salaries held flat

Stock options were reintroduced into the named executive mix at 20 percent alongside 60 percent performance awards and 20 percent restricted stock units, and named executive salaries were not increased for the cycle.

2026 proxy statement
Last updated 2026-08-27